OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, January 15, 2022
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, January 15, 2022
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
DIACRITIC ANTICIPATION
and
DISAPPOINMENTS
If you are unaware of the meaning of the word “Diacritic”,
don’t be disappointed. You can’t be expected to be
familiar with every word in the dictionary. That word is
intended to be a crucial part of this article relating to anticipation
and disappointments. My first recollection of
great anticipation followed by tremendous disappointment
concerns the birth of my sister. At three and a half, an only
child, I was the center of attention. Really quite happy but a
bit lonely. I can remember my parents telling me that soon
a new playmate would arrive and I could hardly wait. Now almost seventy-five years later
I can remember my mother’s voice over the phone as she told me that she would be bringing
home someone else to join our family. “What’s the name?” I asked. and my mother
said “Elaine Rita.”
Already I was a bit disappointed as this sounded like a pretty funny name for a
friend; but in a day or so I waited expectantly with my grandmother at the door with a
little bat and ball ready to play with my new friend. My parents brought in something in a
blanket and told me this was my new sister. What a disappointment! She didn’t do much
but cry all the time. And worse than that, all of the attention that had formerly been mine
alone now was being given to this Elaine creature.
Okay, now let’s move ahead seventy-five years or so to this past Sunday. I awoke
already unhappy because both the Rams and the Chargers were playing important football
games which would determine their eligibility for the playoffs starting this coming
weekend. I was going to miss the games because my wife and I were scheduled to spend
the day with our granddaughter as her mother had to prepare her appellate argument
for a case to be heard on Thursday. Normally I would much rather spend time with my
granddaughter as opposed to doing anything else. Nevertheless I had, let’s say, mixed-
feelings. So at about 6:30 a.m. I walked downstairs to let the dog out. I opened the door
and looking to the east beheld a spectacular bright red sky almost like nothing I had ever
seen before. What an unexpected pleasure. I wakened my wife and for about ten minutes
we gloried in the view.
Soon we were off to pick up our granddaughter from her house. She immediately
started talking about going to Descanso Gardens, her most favorite place. My wife
explained that we all had to get breakfast first and that was not what she expected. We
found a breakfast place pretty near Descanso and kind of anticipated a difficult meal.
Contrary to our expectations the inside of the restaurant was huge and pretty empty and
we were seated at a table right next to a huge window. My granddaughter looked out the
window and started yelling “hummingbirds”! Just outside the window was a hibiscus tree
attracting multiple hummingbirds of different colors sucking to their fill. Surprisingly,
my granddaughter had a wonderful time.
That Sunday was filled with many anticipations and disappointments. I had taped
the football games and looked forward to watching them on Monday. Alas, both games
had gone into overtime and the taped replays ended before the game did. But I have already
used too many words and I promised to talk about “diacritic”. On Monday night,
after midnight, I had attempted to solve the New York Times spelling bee puzzle. For
undoubtedly inappropriate reasons I have great ego involvement in being able to reach
the Genius level every night. I needed only one more word and anticipated a successful
solution. Tuesday I had my customary breakfast with a friend and displayed the puzzle
to him so that we could share my frustration. He looked at the puzzle for a second, one
second, and said “diacritic”.
Whoever heard of such a word? Not only did he know the word but he also
knew its history and went on to discuss a bunch of other things I could not listen to. I
was devastated, crushed, and forced to realize that a great many people in the world are
a lot smarter than I am even though I was the best reader in the third grade. It probably
makes no sense to you or anyone but me; but all morning I thought about disappointments
going all the way back to the arrival of my sister. I want to make an important point
here. I think it’s important to persevere and remain curious and not be so drowned in
the negativity of past failures and to always be on the lookout for new sunsets. Even now.
Especially now!
JOHN MICEK
ABOUT THE GOP’S HISTORICAL
AMNESIA ON VOTING RIGHTS
If you get into an argument with a Republican about the GOP’s lamentable
support for voting rights and its fractured relationship with
Black Americans, it won’t be long before your rhetorical sparring
partner bellows “Robert Byrd” at you and declares the argument over.
The logic here, if it even can be called that, is that because Byrd, the
wizened former U.S. senator from West Virginia who has been dead
for more than a decade, was once a member of the Ku Klux Klan,
then Democrats cannot be true supporters of civil rights and Black
Americans. This political original sin is further compounded, they
will tell you, by the fact that such southern Democrats as the late Arkansas Gov. Orval
Fabus led the charge against school desegregation in the late 1950s.
This analysis leaves out the fact that Byrd had a well-documented change of heart later in
life, and that the so-called “southern strategy” Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater employed
in the 1960s lured racist whites into the Republican fold, where they have remained
ever since.
A half-century later, a Trumpified Republican Party that’s left the legacy of Abraham Lincoln
far behind, is still flipping Democrats the Byrd as it stands steadfastly in the way
of the voting rights legislation that’s now slowly and torturously making its way through
Congress.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer wants to hold a vote on two bills, the John R.
Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act, ahead of Monday’s
nationwide Martin Luther King Day holiday. To do that, Democrats will have to reach an
internal consensus as they debate whether to change the Senate rules to lift the 60-vote
threshold to advance legislation.
With some Democrats opposing the rules change, members of the Congressional Black
Caucus, along with President Joe Biden, are pushing hard for it. The Senate is divided 5050,
with Vice President Kamala Harris wielding the tie-breaking vote.
In a speech in Atlanta on Tuesday, Biden laid out the historic stakes of failing to pass
nationwide voting protections as Republican-controlled legislatures across the country,
including Pennsylvania, have moved to restrict access to the polls.
“I think the threat to our democracy is so great that we must find a way to pass this voting
rights bill,” Biden said. “Debate them, vote, let the majority prevail and if that bare minimum
is blocked, we have no option but to change the Senate rules including getting rid of
the filibuster.”
This week, Republicans opposing the bill made, as Vice News reports, a preposterous argument
against the two bills, claiming that because so many voters turned out in 2020, that
there’s no problem with access to the polls, and the protections embedded in the legislation
aren’t necessary.
While it’s true that voters turned out in droves two years ago, this ahistorical argument
once again conveniently leaves out all the actions that Republicans have taken since then.
At least 19 states have passed 34 laws restricting voting access, according to the Brennan
Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. Analyses have shown that
turnout increased in states that made it easier to vote, and that there’s no threat to the
integrity of elections as a result.
“Simply put, tightening rules to prevent astronomically rare events of fraud is likely to
cause far more harm than good,” Douglas R. Hess, a political science professor at Grinnell
College in Iowa, wrote in a March 2021 analysis published by The Conversation. “The
2020 general election demonstrated that policies expanding access to the ballot – including
ones targeted for elimination by some bills that states are considering this spring – can
be implemented securely, even under highly stressful conditions.”
Only one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, has voted to permit consideration
of a renewed voting rights act. And not a single Republican — including Murkowski —
voted to take up the Freedom to Vote Act.
But, in 2006, the “Voting Rights Act passed 390 to 33 in the House of Representatives and
98 to zero in the Senate with votes from 16 current, sitting Republicans in this United
States Senate. Sixteen of them voted to extend it,” Biden said this week.
On Tuesday, Biden forcefully framed the case for passing the bills this way: “Do you want
to be on the side of Dr. King or George Wallace? Do you want to be on the side of John
Lewis or Bull Connor? Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson
Davis?”
History will judge the GOP based on its final answer.
CHRISTINE FLOWERS
WHAT SIDNEY POITIER TAUGHT
US ABOUT OURSELVES
When my sister texted to tell me that Sidney Poitier had
passed away, and I started crying.
All I could do was conjure up the black and white image
of a beloved movie, “A Patch of Blue,” the film that made
me fall in love with Poitier. It’s a powerful movie that
carries as strong a message about anti-racism as “Guess
Who’s Coming To Dinner,” without its political posturing
and preachiness.
It’s a simple story, about a young blind woman with an abusive mother and a loving
but alcoholic “Opa,” or grandfather. One day, sitting in the park and working on
the necklaces she sells to bring in a little money, a storm arises and her carefully
organized tray of beads spills out onto the grass. It’s at that point that the Poitier
character, passing through the park, runs to help her. A friendship develops. That
friendship turns into love, at least from the young girl’s perspective. Poitier’s affection
is a complicated mixture of attraction, brotherly protection and pity.
The most compelling part of the nascent relationship is that the young girl’s blindness
prevents her from realizing that her new friend is Black. In a very literal sense,
she is color blind. He, on the other hand, is not, and understands the problems that
the racial divide presents. This movie was filmed in 1965, when Jim Crow was a
reality, not just a historical disgrace.
Poitier was the first Black man to win an Academy Award, for his performance as
an itinerant handyman in “Lillies of the Field.” The scene where he teaches a group
of Catholic nuns to sing the Negro spiritual “Amen” is both humorous and deeply
moving. And that movie is, itself, a simple prayer that different races, different
genders and different faiths cannot just coexist, they can glorify the God that created
them.
And then there was “To Sir With Love”, the movie that showed the power that
respect, empathy, good manners and a sense of self-worth can have on those who
were born with no privilege, and end up saddled with the low expectations of
generational poverty. The titular song, sung by Lulu, is an ode to the teachers who
care-often to their own detriment-for children who will grow up, and go away.
Perhaps the public school teachers in Chicago, and all the others who refuse to go
back into their classrooms, should watch it.
And we can’t forget “In The Heat of the Night,” a movie that always reminds me of
my father when I see it because it tells the story of a Philadelphian who encounters
blood-deep racism in the 1960s south. Unlike my father, Virgil Tibbs is Black,
and Poitier inhabits him with the natural instincts of a man who was not used to
overt racism, encounters it, and finds a way to minimize the stain, relationship by
fraught relationship.
I do not write movie reviews. I don’t have the talent or the technical knowledge to
be able to persuade or dissuade a stranger from enjoying a film. I just watch what
I like.
But I needed to write about these films, which have had such an impact on me.
Poitier won his Oscar in 1964, and I’ve grown up my entire life in the shadow of his
work. He’s been quiet for many years, a well-deserved last chapter of a brilliantly-
told story. He earned his peace.
And yet, the messages in his movies were like a thread woven through my own life,
as I grew to understand the evils of racism, the importance of humility, the searing
scars of domestic abuse, the crack in the country, north to south, the power
of the English language, spoken properly and with respect for its innate poetry,
the beauty of loud and boisterous praise, and the fragility of human relationships.
In every one of his movies, Sidney Poitier presented us with possibilities of greatness,
not on battlefields or in laboratories or even on the stage, but within ourselves.
He showed us what we could be like, if we weren’t saddled with bigotry,
impatience, intolerance and probably the worst thing of all: apathy.
That dignity earned him some criticism from people who thought he should have
been less a gentleman and more a rabble rouser like Malcolm X in the service of
equality. In an interview with Oprah Winfrey, he addressed the issue of always
having to be defined by race: “I was fortunate enough to have been raised to a
certain point before I got into the race thing. I had other views of what a human is,
so I was never able to see racism as the big question. Racism was horrendous, but
there were other aspects to life. There are those who allow their lives to be defined
only by race. I correct anyone who comes at me only in terms of race.”
And that’s why we loved him, because he put humanity above identity.
His life, lived like the most perfect prayer, should end like his greatest film: With
an Amen.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|