11
Mountain View News Saturday, August 10, 2019
JOHN MICEK
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
CONTRIBUTORS
Mary Lou Caldwell
Kevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James Snyder
Dr. Tina Paul
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Jeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely Toten
Dan Golden
Rebecca Wright
Hail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
AMERICA, IT
SHOULDN’T
HAVE TO BE
THIS HARD
We’re at a turning point.
Again.
We’re again at a moment
in our nation’s history
where we can decide who we are as a people,
what matters most and what kind of country we
want to hand to our children.
Are we again going to be a state and nation that
passively bears witness to carnage in our streets?
In our shopping malls? Our schools? Our houses
of worship? Our bars and restaurants? Or are
we simply going to shrug, throw our hands in
the air, and conclude once again that this is just
the price of being an American?
The decisions our elected leaders make over the
coming days and weeks on whether to debate
proposals that are so common sense, so basic,
so simple that we shouldn’t even have to debate
them will be our legacy to history, our grant to
posterity.
Again, we find ourselves asking simple questions.
They’re the ones we failed to answer after
Sandy Hook, Orlando, San Bernardino, Las
Vegas, Pittsburgh, Virginia Beach, and Parkland
- after every mass shooting that’s shattered lives
and families, destroyed bodies, and upended entire
communities.
And they’re the ones we fail to answer every day,
when people are gunned down in violent events
that are all too routine in cities like Philadelphia.
Do we surrender to fear? Do we give into hopelessness?
Do we let violence triumph over that
most fundamental of American rights, the one
that Gov. Pennsylvania Tom Wolf alluded to
during a packed rally in the state Capitol rotunda
on Wednesday evening - the right to life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
“We all live in the same country,” Wolf said, answering
a critic in the crowd. “We have the right
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. …
We’re not trying to take anybody’s rights away.
We’re trying to preserve our own.”
That’s the only answer that matters. The only
one that makes any sense.
We’re talking about approving universal
background checks, which, in poll after poll,
Americans support in overwhelming numbers
- irrespective of their party affiliation or tribal
loyalties.
We’re talking about authorizing so-called “red
flag” laws that would allow police and loved
ones to obtain a court order, while respecting
due process, to seize someone’s guns if they
think that person poses a risk to themselves or
to others.
The laws work. Look to Connecticut and Indiana,
where studies have shown a reduction in
suicides.
Republican Sen. Pat Toomey from Pennsylvania
is leading the push for expanded background
checks on his side of Capitol Hill. The Senate
also has a more vigorous background checks bill
approved by the House.
So far, however, Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell has proven stubbornly resistant to
bring the House bill to a vote. But with control
of the Senate on the line in 2020, Republicans
could pay a dear price for inaction. McConnell
has to know that.
But even if Congress does vote, it’s an open
question whether President Donald Trump -
who has supported reform measures in the past,
only to wilt in the face of NRA pressure - would
even sign the bills if they made it to his desk.
Trump, who shattered his call for civility on social
media almost as soon as he made it this week,
cannot be looked upon as an honest broker.
But something has to change.
Otherwise, what do we say to the next Julia Mallory,
a Harrisburg mom whose 17-year-old son,
Julian, was gunned down in 2017? The young
man was “peacemaker” with a community advocacy
group known as Breaking the Chainz.
Do we say, “Tough luck? We tried? You’re on
your own?”
What do we say to the classroom teachers like
Lauren Peck, of the activist group Moms Demand
Action, who has to swallow back her own
fear so that she can be a self-described “superhero”
to her child and to her middle-school
students?
Those are choices we should never have to ask
our parents, our educators, our middle-school
kids to make. But every time we fail to act, that’s
exactly what we do.
But it doesn’t have to be that way. We’re at a
turning point.
Again.
We have the solutions within reach, a remedy
within our grasp. There’s only one path forward.
We have to be brave enough to take it.
It shouldn’t be this hard.
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
and reserves the right to
refuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
DICK POLMAN
RICH MANIERI
SELF-EXAMINATION WOULD BE A
GOOD START IN RESPONSE TO MASS
SHOOTINGS
WILL REPUBLICANS FINALLY DISOWN
TRUMP’S INCENDIARY RACISM?
Amidst the latest bloodshed - the worst of it triggered
by a white racist domestic terrorist whose El
Paso manifesto echoes Trump’s racist rhetoric - I bet
you’re jonesing for some good news. I’m happy to
share what I have. Admittedly it isn’t much, but at
this point we should probably be grateful whenever
a few Republicans wake up and smell their party’s
white supremacist stench.
“The Republican Party is enabling white supremacy
in our country. As a lifelong Republican, it pains me to say this, but it’s
the truth,” wrote Nebraska state senator John McCollister. “We have a
Republican president who continually stokes racist fears in his base. He
calls certain countries ‘sh*tholes,’ tells women of color to ‘go back’ to
where they came from and lies more than he tells the truth.”
Senator Ted Cruz - yes, Cruz - said on Sunday morning, “What we saw
yesterday was a heinous act of terrorism and white supremacy. There is
no place for this in El Paso, in Texas, or anywhere across our nation.”
And early Monday morning, the conservative, pro-GOP Washington
Examiner posted an editorial that assailed El Paso’s “white nationalist
terrorist,” and declared: “Some conservatives and Republicans have hesitated
to acknowledge that this a growing scourge, but after El Paso any
such reluctance is unacceptable … Trump needs to make clear that he
hates white nationalism as something un-American and evil.”
So at least some on the right are finally speaking out, but rest assured,
they won’t get much help from Trump, who on Monday blamed the
slaughter of Hispanics on the media and “fake news.”
The problem for Trump is that “The Media” accurately showed him at
a May 8 Florida rally railing about immigrants crossing the border, and
when he asked, “How do we stop these people?” somebody yelled, “Shoot
them!” - and when his cultists laughed, cheered, and applauded, the cameras
caught him smirking. He didn’t admonish the crowd, he indulged
it: “That’s only in the Panhandle you can get away with that statement.”
“The Media” has given him ample opportunity to renounce his incendiary
bigotry. On the White House lawn last Thursday, as he prepared
to leave for another rally, he was asked how he’d respond if the crowd
chanted that four Democratic congresswomen of color should go back
to where they came from. Instead of saying that the chant was racist, that
the four women were Americans, he said this: “I don’t know if you can
stop people (from chanting). You know what my message is? I love them,
and I think they really love me.”
Trump didn’t order the El Paso shooter onto the killing field. But ever
since he descended his escalator in June 2015 to attack Mexico for sending
“criminals” and “rapists,” he has given verbal aid and comfort to aspiring
white domestic terrorists. The shooter’s manifesto assails an Hispanic
“invasion,” echoing a word that surfaces in a number of Trump
tweets. The shooter also once retweeted a photo of the word “Trump”
spelled out in firearms.
Trump himself has long winked at the potential for violence. Meanwhile,
his regime has cut off funding to a national terrorism database
that has charted the rise of right-wing domestic terrorism. You have to be
willfully dense, or deep in denial, to not connect the dots - case in point,
acting Trump chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who said “no politician is to
blame” for El Paso.
David French, a conservative lawyer who writes for the conservative
National Review, has connected those dots. On Monday, he pointed out
that the rise of the violent right is “directly related” to Trump’s rhetoric.
“Most Americans remember the Tree of Life synagogue massacre in
Pittsburgh. Do you remember the white supremacist who killed a black
man in New York with a sword? Do you remember the attempted church
massacre in Kentucky, where a white supremacist who couldn’t gain access
to the church gunned down two black victims at a Kroger grocery
story instead? Do you remember that a member of an ‘alt-Reich’ Facebook
group stabbed a black Maryland college student to death without
provocation, or that a white man in Kansas shouted ethnic slurs before
shooting two Indian engineers in a bar, killing one?” French wrote. “Substitute
‘jihadist’ for ‘white supremacist’ or ‘white nationalist’ and then
imagine how we’d act.”
Monday from the Oval Office, Trump read from his TelePrompTer and
said that white supremacy is bad. We’ll soon find out whether he has the
gravitas to say that to his rally fans.
If the circumstances weren’t so awful, the
predictability of the response would almost
be laughable.
Every mass shooting inspires new calls
for gun control, as politicians and pundits
retreat to their partisan bunkers and lob
blame where they believe it will do the most
damage.
I believe in the Constitution, though I don’t
view every piece of legislation designed to
keep firearms out of the hands of criminals
or the unstable as a slippery slope toward repeal
of the Second Amendment.
It seems pretty naive to think that someone
bent on mass murder is going to forget the
whole thing because he can’t get his hands
on a particular weapon. Criminals tend to
be resourceful. Timothy McVeigh killed 168
people in Oklahoma City and never fired a
shot.
“Assault weapon” is a made-up political
term designed to expand the list of firearms
that gun control proponents believe should
be banned. The AR-15, which is a hunting rifle,
falls into this category. It fires one round
at a time, like a pistol or a revolver. It can fire
about 50 rounds in a minute as opposed to a
fully automatic, military issue carbine which
fires about 1,000 rounds per minute. The
U.S. banned the sale of new, fully automatic
weapons in 1986.
You want to ban the AR-15? Fine. There are
tens of millions of legally-owned AR-15s in
the U.S. And keep in the mind that the man
responsible for the deadliest school shooting
in American history - Virginia Tech in 2007
- used two handguns.
So-called “red flag” laws, which President
Trump supports, and more expansive background
checks make sense. Seventeen states
already have a red flag laws, which allows for
a court order to prevent someone deemed a
danger to himself or others from having access
to a firearm.
That’s a start, though it will be difficult to
move forward, mostly because of the shameful
politicization of the issue. Within minutes
of the shooting in El Paso, Democratic
presidential candidates were blaming the
president.
If that’s the case then perhaps we should
blame the left for the Dayton shooter who,
according to published reports, was a socialist,
gun control advocate and Elizabeth Warren
supporter. We can also blame the left for
the man who shot up a Washington D.C.
baseball field and tried to kill several Republican
members of Congress in 2017. The
shooter once worked for Bernie Sanders. Or
maybe we can blame President Obama and
his criticism of police for inspiring a gunman
to kill five cops in Dallas in 2016.
I don’t buy it.
And the reality is that while mass shootings
understandably
generate the most attention,
we’re killing
each other in ways
and places that inspire
a conspicuous
lack of outrage.
Since the infamous
clock tower shooting
on the University
of Texas campus in 1966, there have been
165 mass shootings in the U.S., according
to an analysis by the Washington Post. For
purposes of the analysis, a mass shooting is
defined as one in which four or more people
are killed by a single shooter. The analysis
does not include domestic or gang-related
incidents.
Using the Post’s criteria, 1,196 people in the
U.S. have been killed in mass shootings since
1966.
In 2018, the number of homicides - by firearms
or otherwise - in Chicago, Philadelphia
and Baltimore totaled 1,223.
Over the weekend in Chicago, 53 people
were shot, seven killed. You probably haven’t
heard much about it.
I’m more interested in why we’re killing
each other wholesale, on a daily basis, rather
than how we’re doing it.
Perhaps we need to look deeper than the
simplistic explanations - political rhetoric,
social media, video games, the availability
of firearms - and consider a society in which
people are willing to take lives without considering
the impact or the consequences.
We dismiss the presence of evil in the world
until a massacre reveals it in neon. And soon
after, we dismiss it again.
We foster a culture of victimhood, where
our dissatisfaction with life is always someone
else’s fault.
We lack empathy for those who disagree
with us.
We value revenge over forgiveness.
We talk about diversity only as it relates to
physical characteristics; never diversity of
thought or opinion.
We allow our children to retreat into the
isolation of virtual world, devoid of genuine
human interaction.
We fight the rule of law and wonder why
our young people don’t respect authority.
We dethrone God and exalt ourselves.
As Christians, we do a great job of telling
people what they shouldn’t be doing and a
lousy job of showing them Jesus.
Yes, the one who pulled the trigger is ultimately
responsible and accountable.
Maybe the rest of us need to look in the
mirror.
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|