18
THE WORLD AROUND US
Mountain Views-News Saturday, February 4, 2012
EARTH’S ENERGY BUDGET OUT OF BALANCE
DESPITE LOW SOLAR ACTIVITY
A new NASA study
underscores the fact that
greenhouse gases generated
by human activity—not
changes in solar activity—
are the primary force
driving global warming.
The study offers an
updated calculation of the
Earth’s energy imbalance,
the difference between the
amount of solar energy
absorbed by Earth’s surface
and the amount returned
to space as heat. The
researchers’ calculations
show that, despite unusually
low solar activity between
2005 and 2010, the planet
continued to absorb more
energy than it returned to
space.
James Hansen, director of
NASA’s Goddard Institute
for Space Studies (GISS)
in New York City, led the
research. The journal
Atmospheric Chemistry
and Physics published the
study in December 2011.
Total solar irradiance—the
amount of energy produced
by the Sun that reaches the
top of each square meter of
the Earth’s atmosphere—
typically declines by about
a tenth of a percent during
cyclical lulls in solar activity
caused by shifts in the Sun’s
magnetic field. Usually
solar minimums occur
about every eleven years and
last a year or so, but the most
recent minimum persisted
more than two years longer
than normal, making it the
longest minimum recorded
during the satellite era.
Pinpointing the magnitude
of Earth’s energy imbalance
is fundamental to climate
science because it offers a
direct measure of the state
of the climate. Energy
imbalance calculations also
serve as the foundation for
projections of future climate
change. If the imbalance is
positive and more energy
enters the system than exits,
Earth grows warmer. If the
imbalance is negative, the
planet grows cooler.
Hansen’s team concluded
that Earth has absorbed
more than half a watt
more solar energy per
square meter than it let off
throughout the six-year
study period. The calculated
value of the imbalance
(0.58 watt of excess energy
per square meter) is more
than twice as much as the
reduction in the amount of
solar energy supplied to the
planet between maximum
and minimum solar activity
(0.25 watt per square meter).
“The fact that we still
see a positive imbalance
despite the prolonged solar
minimum isn’t a surprise,
given what we’ve learned
about the climate system,
but it’s worth noting because
this provides unequivocal
evidence that the Sun is
not the dominant driver of
global warming,” Hansen
said.
According to calculations
conducted by Hansen and
his colleagues, the 0.58 watt
per square meter imbalance
implies that carbon dioxide
levels need to be reduced to
about 350 parts per million
to restore the energy budget
to equilibrium. The most
recent measurements show
that carbon dioxide levels
are currently 392 parts
per million and scientists
expect that concentration
to continue to rise in the
future.
Climate scientists have
been refining calculations
of the Earth’s energy
imbalance for many years,
but this newest estimate
is an improvement over
previous attempts because
the scientists had access
to better measurements of
ocean temperature than
researchers have had in the
past.
The improved
measurements came from
free-floating instruments
that directly monitor the
temperature, pressure and
salinity of the upper ocean
to a depth of 6,500 feet. The
network of instruments,
known collectively as Argo,
has grown dramatically
in recent years since
researchers first began
deploying the floats a
decade ago. Today, more
than 3,400 Argo floats
actively take measurements
and provide data to the
public.
You can contact Bob
Eklund at: b.eklund@
MtnViewsNews.com.
A graph of the sun's total solar irradiance shows that in recent years irradiance
dipped to the lowest levels recorded during the satellite era. The
resulting reduction in the amount of solar energy available to affect Earth's
climate was about .25 watts per square meter, less than half of Earth's total
energy imbalance. (Credit: NASA/James Hansen)
NEW VIEW ON (ONLINE)
PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS
I ran across this interesting piece on online media and
its effects on this years election. I yield my space to:
(NAPS)—According to a recent Pew Research study, 22
percent of adults used social networking sites to plug into
the last elections. Social media use in the next presidential
election race promises to be even higher, with innovative sites
already sprouting up to help citizens voice their opinions,
show support for their favorite candidates and even get a
chance at the ballot themselves. Seasoned political pundits
and novice voters are rapidly adopting new online media
that aim to level the political playing field and get involved in
ways never before possible.
“In recent history, presidential candidates have needed very
deep pockets, knowledge of the complex campaign process
and a huge network of support resources to even get noticed,”
said Bryan Lee, co-founder of Votocracy, a new social media
site where anyone can toss their hat into the presidential ring
for as little as $1. “We aim to be the great political equalizer,
providing anyone of the 200 million voting-age Americans a
shot at getting on the presidential ticket and gaining millions
of supporters, simply through the power of social media.”
The site offers members free access to find and interact with
political candidates, then helps those candidates amass
support from the American people after registering
their own presidential campaign—which takes only
minutes. The Votocracy process culminates in a
nationally televised reality show in which the candidates
who generate the most support compete for America’s
support.
Other political networking sites, online communities and
tools have emerged to help people engage and learn more
about upcoming elections, participate in political
discussions and keep tabs on specific politicians. This new
wave of social media sites means a new breed of “political
entrepreneur” can quickly gain momentum without
having deep pockets, years of political experience or even
notoriety—just the drive to compete and a passion for
change.
The campaign season promises to be more accessible
and interactive than ever before, making it easy to
get involved, either to support
a favorite candidate
or campaign. For a look at what many are calling the
future of politics
via social media, visit www.Votocracy.
com.
Votocracy members can get involved
and express their
political opinion on daily polls like: “What is the biggest
problem with our current election process?”
KATIE Tse..........This and That
TATER LOVES PAPER!
HEALTH RISKS &
CONCERNS ASSOCIATED
WITH PUPPY PAPER PICA
Happy Tails
by Chris Leclerc.
Canyon Canine Dog
Walking & Pet Sitting Services
PASSIVE
AGGRESSION
IN THE BREAK
ROOM!
If your job is anything
like mine, you leave
your office or cubicle to
eat in the break room. Although it may
seem casual, the break room has a definite
unspoken code of conduct. The first rule
is: “Don’t microwave fish!” People act all
grossed out when someone microwaves
halibut or cod; but honestly, is the odor that
nauseating? Of course you really shouldn’t
be eating fish (my vegan soap box), but if
you’re going to anyway, you should be able
to enjoy it at work! The second rule is even
harsher: “Don’t microwave cruciferous
vegetables!” Broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage
--they all cause the microwave to emit a
gust of flatulence. I can accept the “no fish”
rule, but outlawing some of the healthiest
(and cheapest) veggies is just criminal!
I did some very light research and found
that, while people complain about the
smell of others’ food, there’s an even larger
group of people who complain about the
people who complain. (I am in the latter
group --scandalous, I know!) It’s high
time that microwavers defend their right
to enjoy an oily fish or broccoli stir fry!
Beyond the basic lunch room
etiquette is a whole system of refrigerator
maintenance. The fridge inevitably gets
crowded with forgotten or abandoned food
items --ranging from soggy to medicinal
in a penicillin sort of way. Since the
fridge belongs to everyone (and therefore
to no one), its cleaning usually has to be
enforced. For example, in January the
public relations department is responsible
for cleaning the fridge on the last Friday of
the month. “Cleaning” is a relative term
that usually means throwing out expired
or unlabeled items. All the employees
are forewarned of this monthly purging.
However, some cleaners are ruthless,
throwing away things that are clearly
labeled. I recall a friend who suspected
other coworkers were purposely trashing
her food. In self defense, she began writing
a different employee’s office number on her
food to save it from being dumped. This
method worked, which is somewhat sad,
because it confirmed her suspicion that
she was being targeted.
If your food isn’t dumped, that doesn’t
mean it isn’t safe from predators. Another
friend told me that her boss had to actually
email employees to put their name on
their lunch, and to not eat food they didn’t
bring. Apparently some people assumed
unmarked lunches were free for the
taking, and ate them. All I can imagine
is the embarrassment of being caught
consuming your coworker’s sandwich.
Besides the danger and etiquette related
to the break room, there can be a whole
protocol about mere use of the microwave!
A friend related an experience when she
unthinkingly inserted her lunch into the
microwave, only to be stopped by another
coworker. “Sally,” she scolded, “there’s a
LINE to use the microwave!” My friend
surveyed her coworkers in various relaxed
positions. Any objective assessment of
the scene wouldn’t have assumed a line
was present. Sally retrieved her cold
lunch, silently vowing to buy her own
microwave and never enter the break
room again! Popping in a Tupperware
of potatoes and pork, the microwave
policewoman conspicuously whispered to
another coworker, “Don’t worry, Heather,
I made sure yours got in next!” Oy! With
coworkers like that who needs enemies?
Needless to say, Sally soon purchased her
very own office microwave and has lived
happily ever after (except for the time
that the communal microwave broke, and
everyone lined up at her door to use her
microwave. She really should’ve charged
for that).
The lessons from this article are: 1)
if possible, buy your own fridge and
microwave, 2) if you must use the break
room fridge, clearly label your items, 3) be
prepared to defend your right to eat fish
and brussel sprouts, 4) know you enemy
--they could be down right nasty or just
covetous of your Buca di Beppo leftovers,
5) trust no one!
My 10-year-old bloodhound,
“Tatertotts” loves to eat paper. Soft
paper products such as toilet paper,
napkins and facial tissue are her
favorites. I discovered Tater’s paper
fetish inadvertently one day, when I
noticed her nudging at the pocket of
my jacket, where I happened to have
a tissue stashed away, just in case.
She was relentless in her pursuit for
that wad of paper, and even though I
know she has a nose that can detect
a scent of just about any kind from
a mile away, I was still surprised
that she knew I had a small bit of
tissue in my pocket, sight un-seen.
She apparently smelled it through
the thick denim fabric of my jacket.
When I refused to give it to her, she
growled a bit, pushed her enormous
wet nose right inside my pocket and
snagged it out. She then proceeded
to chew on it with a look on her face
as if I’d given her a piece of tender
loin! I expected her to spit it out
eventually, after mashing down with
her teeth into a saliva soaked ball, but
instead she swallowed it and looked
up at me with begging eyes, in hopes
of talking me into giving her another
piece! When I said “no more”, she
started nudging at my jacket again,
until I finally had to turn my pockets
inside out to convince her there
was no more paper there. It struck
me as strange that she would be so
intrigued with eating a tasteless
product such as tissue paper, so I
decided to do a little research on
the subject. Meanwhile, I thought it
would be best to keep paper out of
Tater’s reach, but she is one sneaky
girl, and has a way of getting what
she wants, behind my back. Let’s just
say she keeps me on my toes!
As it turns out, puppy paper
pica (a dog’s desperate desire to eat
paper) is quite common among
canines, particularly large breeds. I
also learned that there are numerous
theories as to why dogs love to eat
paper, but I had already formulated
a couple of theories of my own
as to the reason for Tater’s
paper fetish. First of all, Tatertotts
is a bloodhound with the longest,
floppiest, sloppiest lips I have ever
seen on a dog (or any animal, for that
matter!), and I somehow think that
chewing on something that “melts
in her mount” probably provides a
sensation much like what we feel
when we chew on gum. For that
reason, I guess I can understand
why Tater would want to chew on
paper, but that doesn’t explain her
desire to swallow it. I couldn’t help
wondering why she would want to
ingest unused napkins and tissues,
rather than chewing and spitting
them out, or simply tearing them
apart and leaving them in a heap the
way many dogs do. I was quite sure
Tater did not have any medical issues
that might cause her to want to eat
paper, but just to be sure, I consulted
with my veterinarian and ruled out
any concerns regarding her health.
I chose not to be concerned, but to
continue doing my best to keep her
away from paper in the future.
It wasn’t until one day while I
was picking up Tater’s poop (please
pardon the graphics) in the back
yard and saw the “end result” of her
sneaky fetish that I realized the paper
that she’d swiped out of the trash can
the day before had made its way
through her digestive tract almost
fully intact! It had changed shape,
of course, but it appeared to be all
there, un-torn and in one piece, like
a long rope twisted tightly together.
It was then that it dawned on me
that the paper may have performed
a practical purpose in the process,
acting as a sort of bonding agent in
Tater’s digestive system, and if so, it
suggested to me that perhaps Tater
might just need more fiber in her
diet. I always include some kind of
fresh vegetable mixed in with her
dry food, along with a little water
to help her swallow it easily without
choking, causing a bloat and twist
reaction. After finding the paper
in her poop that day, I decided
to add more fibrous foods to
her diet, such as broccoli, sweet
peas, spinach and lettuce. The new
additions to Tater’s daily food rations
certainly have been good for her,
but by no means has it changed the
way she feels about paper. That, I’m
afraid, is a love affair that will last
forever. I guess Tater’s preferred
Valentine comes in the form of tissue
paper rather than a greeting card!
Some of the theories and opinions
that I discovered during my “puppy
pica research” on-line, helped
confirm my own theory about Tater‘s
love affair with tissues, but there
were other indications as to why
dogs eat paper that took me rather
by surprise. Boredom, for example
showed up on several blogs and
websites as a potential prompt for
paper pica. Another possible cause
is puppy promiscuity. Some young
dogs simply like to get into things,
much like a human child enjoys
catching mom off guard by raiding
the kitchen pantry. Other theories
have to do with diet or health, while
others indicate a need to chew in
general.
Whatever the reasons or causes,
the general consensus is that paper
pica among canines is unhealthy and
should be prevented. Over a period
of time, ingested paper can cause
serious problems in a dog’s digestive
system, such as blockage resulting in
septic shock and internal infections.
Regardless of the reasons why a dog
wants to eat paper, it is important
that the human do whatever it takes
to keep it out of their reach. Now that
I know the health risks associated
with canine paper pica, I am careful
not to leave facial tissues, napkins or
toilet paper in a place where Tater
might get to them. It still remains a
sort of family joke, though, that Tater
prefers paper over her store-bought
doggie treats!
|