14
OPINION
Mountain Views News Saturday, April 23, 2016
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
PRODUCTION
Richard Garcia
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Dr. Tina Paul
Rich Johnson
Merri Jill Finstrom
Lori Koop
Rev. James Snyder
Tina Paul
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Welborn
Renee Quenell
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Marc Garlett
Pat Birdsall (retired)
HOWARD Hays As I See It
MAKING SENSE by MICHAEL Reagan
WHAT TRUMP PEOPLE DON’T GET
Trump people kill me.
They’ve been whining for weeks about how the Republican
Party primary system works.
They say it’s rigged because their hero is pulling in the
most votes and the most delegates but still might not win
the nomination.
They say it’s all very simple: Trump’s getting the most
votes and therefore it’s only fair that the per-son with the most votes from the
people should win the nomination.
As I tweeted earlier this week, if that’s the way Trump’s followers think, then
they should all be sup-porters of Al Gore.
In the 2000 election Gore got 540,000 more votes than George W. Bush, but
Bush ended up in the White House because he accumulated the most Electoral
College votes.
The Founding Founders & Framers knew what they were doing when they set
up the Electoral Col-lege to indirectly choose the president. They didn’t want
a popular vote and they didn’t want Congress to pick the chief executive. And
they sure didn’t want a candidate for president to be able to just campaign in
three or four big states and rack up huge vote totals and win that way. The
Founders deliberately set it up so each state got its electoral votes in proportion
to its repre-sentatives and senators. They wanted every part of the country to
be part of the process of choosing a president, not just one heavily populated
region or one strong faction of nut balls or extremists. (Not that Trump people
are nutballs or extremists.) It’s the same representative principle at work in the
Republican Party’s primary system.
The GOP doesn’t want some guy to be able to win the nomination by flying a
757 into a handful of big states like California, New York, Texas, Illinois, Ohio
and Florida, holding campaign events for 20,000 people at the airport and then
flying home to Upper Upper Manhattan.
They want a nominee who gets on the ground, walks the neighborhoods, shakes
hands and does the hard retail work at the grass roots.
That’s what Ted Cruz has been doing to win his delegates while Trump has been
doing TV inter-views and zooming back and forth over Flyover Country.
Trump people might not like the primary process because their hero is not winning,
or think there is cheating and rigging going on.
But they have to understand there is a process and it’s not about vote counts, it’s
about the delegate count. It’s not that tough to get.
Meanwhile, what really concerns me lately is how Trump is wrecking his ability
to unify the GOP around his candidacy in the fall if he does win the nomination.
He spends parts of every speech and press conference announcing that he hopes
that his support-ers don’t make trouble if he doesn’t win. He hopes they don’t
riot in the streets.
I’m getting tired of his veiled threats, because that is what they really are.
It’s time for Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee,
to stand up at a press conference and tell Trump to cut it out.
Maybe threats and intimidation are part of the Donald's winning strategy in
business. But it’s not how it’s supposed to work when you’re trying to win the
presidential nomination of the Republican Party.
Michael Reagan. Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political
consultant, and the author of “The New Reagan Revolution” (St. Martin’s
Press).
“America has always been
best when she is lying
down with her back on
the mat.”
- Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
in Philadelphia, following
the New York primaries
Sorry I wasn’t around
to cheer things up on
this page last week,
especially with Tom Purcell’s column being
such a downer. He complained that his health
insurance costs have gone up, he owed more
than he thought he would in taxes, and he
got “sore” with some supporter of Sen. Bernie
Sanders (D-VT) who thought the rich should
pay their “fair share” so he could get more “free
stuff” (though I’m sure the supporter never
used that phrase).
We all benefit from highways, national
security, parks, environmental and safety
agencies, courts, public schools, fire and
police departments. We don’t think of them
as “free stuff”, but rather accept the shared
cost to ensure the well-being of our nation.
Most developed countries feel the same way
about healthcare, higher education, secure
retirements and family leave; not a matter of
“free stuff” but of necessary investments in the
country and its people.
I was sorry to hear of Purcell’s rising health
insurance costs. My premiums have gone up,
too. But nationally, it’s at a rate far less than the
average 10% annual hike before the Affordable
Care Act was enacted. Except for those who’d
been unable to obtain coverage before or
received subsidies through the exchanges, I
don’t recall the president predicting a major
drop or price freeze, anyway. We have a
pattern, though, of Republicans seeing their
own predictions not panning out and then
going out and claiming they did, anyway.
Sen. Ted Cruz is out claiming that “millions
of Americans” have lost coverage because of
the ACA. According to Census Bureau figures,
by 2014, four years after the law was passed,
the number of uninsured had come down by
10 million – a 25% drop. Cruz calls the ACA
“the biggest job-killer in the country”. The
unemployed rate has continued coming down
since the law took effect. Far from companies
cutting benefits, as Republicans warned would
happen, 3 million more workers have gained
coverage through their employers since the
ACA’s passage.
The ACA has done a lot to alleviate
healthcare inequality - with most of the gains
in coverage affecting immigrants, low-wage
and part-time workers, young people and those
without a college education. It’s also proved a
sound investment, with our nation’s collective
medical bill adjusted downward every year
under the ACA.
Purcell made clear in his column that, with
what he himself had to shell out at tax time, he
gets really miffed by those wanting an even a
bigger bite to be taken out of those who “earn”
their money. My guess, though, is the Sanders
supporter’s emphasis was more on the “fair
share” aspect of the argument.
Nothing’s free, everything costs - and if
you’ve got enough to spend, you can even buy
your way out of any “fair share” obligation.
According to Oxfam, every dollar spent by
America’s biggest companies on lobbying
gets them $130 in tax breaks. That same single
lobbying dollar also gets them some $4,000 in
federal loans, loan guarantees and bailouts. For
every dollar America’s fifty largest corporations
do pay in taxes, they get twenty-seven dollars’
worth of that federal “free stuff”.
A Social Science Research study from January
found such legalized tax dodging costs us
$111 billion a year. United/Continental and
American Airlines, General Motors, Hewlett-
Packard, News Corp. (Fox), PG&E, Loew’s
and twenty other S&P 500 companies that
reported millions in profits last year not only
paid no taxes, but got millions out of the U.S.
government in tax credits.
Take a guess – In what one country did
American companies in 2012 report more
profit than in Japan, Germany, China and
France combined? The answer is Bermuda – a
country accounting for less than one-tenth of
one-percent of these companies’ employees
worldwide. Oxfam reports that in 2012 U.S.
multinationals shifted $1 of every $4 in profits,
some $700 billion, to countries with low or zero
tax rates to dodge their “fair share”. Globally,
$7.6 trillion, an amount about the size of the
German and British economies put together, is
stashed overseas as a tax dodge.
There’s also the $270 billion lost every year
to plain old cheating. It’s not going to get any
easier cracking down on it, either. Republicans
want to cut another $350 million from the
IRS budget, which has already seen $1 billion
in cuts since 2010 (while 10 million more
taxpayers were added to the rolls).
With those cuts came the loss of 6,000
enforcement personnel. IRS Commissioner
John Koskinen estimates that if he had 5,000
of them back, we could recover $4-to-$5
billion a year from the cheats. Every dollar
invested in enforcement brings four dollars in
recovered revenue, but Republicans have never
been concerned with numbers – they see the
cuts as a way to maybe kill “Obamacare” and
protect their Koch-backed money-launderers
scamming the IRS by posing as tax-exempt
non-profits.
Combining the “legal” tax dodgers and
illegal cheats, that’s nearly half-a-trillion dollars
a year that has to be made up by those of us who
do pay our “fair share”. Meanwhile, columnist
Tom Purcell is bothered by a Bernie Sanders
supporter he says wants “free stuff”, like maybe
affordable healthcare and a college education.
As for today’s quote - I don’t know what it
means, either. Donald Trump is scary. But Ted
Cruz (who wants to abolish the IRS altogether)
can get downright creepy.
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
CHANGE OF NAME
NO. VS028613
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS:
Petitioner: SARAH LIM
HAS FILED A PETITION WITH THE LOS ANGE-LES SUPERIOR COURT - NORTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FOR A DECREE CHANGING NAMES AS FOLLOWS:
Present Name: Proposed Name:
SARAH LIM MINHEE SHIN
A HEARING on the petition will be held on 06/15/2016 at 1:30PM in Dept. C at LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT,
NORWALK, SOUTHEAST DISTRICT, 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, CA. 90650.
THE COURT ORDERS that all interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show
cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted.
Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the
objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why
the petition should not be granted.
If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
JDC - Mountain Views News
April 16, 23, 30, May 7, 2016
Sarah Lim
11233 Barnwall St. #E
Norwalk, CA 90650
(714) 994-8647
Petitioner Appearing Pro Per
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION - CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION
File No. 2016-0358396
File Date 03/31/2016
1. The construction provided for pursuant to Construction Contract No. PR
13-1079, dated 01/04/2016, including all approval amendments, between
Paul Ghotra, RUS designation OWNER(“Owner”) and SURINDER SINGH
BHOGAL – CONTRACTOR (“Contractor”) HAS BEEN COMPLETED AS OF
14th January, 2016, and is in compliance with the provisions of the Construction
Contract, including all plans, specifications, maps, and drawings and all
modifications thereof.
2. Payment in full has been made to all persons who have furnished labor for
the Project.
3. The Contractor has obtained valid releases of lien from all manufacturers,
material suppliers, and subcontractors furnishing services or materials which
were employed by the Contractor in the performance of the Construction
Contract, and that such releases have been delivered by the Contractor to the
Owner.
4. If applicable, the Final Inventory attached hereto and made a part hereof is a
complete and accurate summary of all units of construction in the project and of
all work performed in accordance with the Construction Contract.
5. If applicable, the staking sheets and tabulation of staking sheets upon which
the Final Inventory is based show the accurate location, number, and kind of all
units of construction of the project and show all work performed in accordance
with the Construction Contract.
6. All defects in workmanship and materials reported during the period of
construction of the project have been corrected.
7. The total cost of the project as completed is One Million Four Hundred Fifty
Thousand dollars and 00 Cents.
Dated this 31st day of March, 2016
Name of Architect of Engineer, Surinder Singh Bhogal, General Contractor.
Date 03/31/2016
We the undersigned Owner and Contractor, do hereby certify that:
1. The Project has been completed in accordance with the provisions of the
Construction Contract, dated 01/14/2016, provided, however, that acceptance
of the project by the Owner shall not be deemed to relieve the Contractor of
its obligations contained in the Construction Contract with respect to defective
workmanship or, materials discovered within one year after the date of
completion.
2. If applicable, the Final Inventory attached hereto and made a part hereof is a
complete and accurate summary of all units of construction in the Project and of
work performed in accordance with the Construction Contract.
Paul Ghotra (Owner)
Name of Contractor:
Surinder Singh Bhogal
Signed By /s/
General Contractor
Publish: Mountain Views News
Dates Pub: April 09, 16, 23, 30, 2016
NOTICE OF AMENDED PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF
GUNTER ANTON SCHREINER
Case No. BP167463
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate,
or both, of GUNTER ANTON SCHREINER
AN AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Leon Kirakosian in the Superior Court of California, County
of LOS ANGELES.
THE AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Leon Kirakosian be appointed as personal representative to
administer the estate of the decedent.
THE AMENDED PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any
codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE AMENDED PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates
Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before
taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons
unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be
granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant
the authority.
A HEARING on the amended petition will be held on May 11, 2016 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 67 located at 111 N. Hill St.,
Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written
objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a
copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first
issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60
days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney
knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court
a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition
or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for petitioner:
SILVA BEREJIAN ESQ
SBN 143076
KIRAKOSIAN & ASSOCIATES
108 N BRAND BLVD
STE 201
GLENDALE CA 91203-2679
Mountain Views News
April 23, 30, May 7, 2016
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|