Arts and More | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Views News, Pasadena Edition [Sierra Madre] Saturday, March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2 ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS NEWS & TRENDS Mountain Views-News Saturday, March 31, 2018 FAMILY MATTERS By Marc Garlett Jeff’s Book Pics By Jeff Brown How Jesus Became God : the Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee by Bart D. Ehrman New York Times bestselling author and Bible expert Bart Ehrman reveals how Jesus’s divinity became dogma in the first few centuries of the early church.The claim at the heart of the Christian faith is that Jesus of Nazareth was, and is, God. But this is not what the original disciples believed during Jesus’s lifetime—and it is not what Jesus claimed about himself. How Jesus Became God tells the story of an idea that shaped Christianity, and of the evolution of a belief that looked very different in the fourth century than it did in the first.A master explainer of Christian history, texts, and traditions, Ehrman reveals how an apocalyptic prophet from the backwaters of rural Galilee crucified for crimes against the state came to be thought of as equal with the one God Almighty, Creator of all things. But how did he move from being a Jewish prophet to being God? In a book that took eight years to research and write, Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection. Only when some of Jesus’s followers had visions of him after his death—alive again—did anyone come to think that he, the prophet from Galilee, had become God. And what they meant by that was not at all what people mean today. Written for secular historians of religion and believers alike, How Jesus Became God will engage anyone interested in the historical developments that led to the affirmation at the heart of Christianity: Jesus was, and is, God. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman For almost 1,500 years, the New Testament manuscripts were copied by hand––and mistakes and intentional changes abound in the competing manuscript versions. Religious and biblical scholar Bart Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself are the results of both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes.In this compelling and fascinating book, Ehrman shows where and why changes were made in our earliest surviving manuscripts, explaining for the first time how the many variations of our cherished biblical stories came to be, and why only certain versions of the stories qualify for publication in the Bibles we read today. Ehrman frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultra– conservative views of the Bible. Jesus and Buddha: The Parallel Sayings by Marcus Borg (Editor), by Jack Kornfield (Introduction) This remarkable collection reveals how Jesus and Buddha— whether talking about love, wisdom, or materialism—were guiding along the same path. Jesus & Buddha also delves into the mystery surrounding their strikingly similar teachings and presents over one hundred examples from each.”As a Christian, I grew up with Jesus and have lived with him all my life. I have not lived with the Buddha. Similarly my work on this book was from the vantage point of a Jesus scholar. But my experience has led me to the conclusion that their teachings about ‘the way’ are virtually identical and that together they are the two most remarkable religious figures who ever lived.”Marcus Borg.--”You hold in your hand a remarkable and beautiful book. Jesus and Buddha are now meeting in an encounter of the spirit. When we listen deeply to their words we find that in many ways, they speak with one heart. If we could enact even one verse from these teachings, it would have the power to illuminate our hearts, free us from confusion and transform our lives.”Jack Kornfield. The previous book reviews are from Amazon.com DON’T MAKE THESE COMMON, EXPENSIVE MISTAKES: HOW TO LEAVE ASSETS TO MINOR CHILDREN Most parents want to make sure their children are provided for in the event something happens to them while the children are still minors. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, and good friends sometimes want to leave gifts to beloved young children, too. Unfortunately, good intentions and poor planning often have unintended results. Don’t make these common, expensive mistakes. Instead, here’s how to both protect and provide for the children you love. Common Mistake: Don’t Use a Simple Will to Leave Assets to Minor Children Many parents think if they name a guardian for their minor children in their wills and something happens to them, the named person will automatically be able to use the inheritance to take care of the children. But that’s not what happens: . When the will is probated, the court will appoint a guardian to raise the child; usually this is the person named by the parents in their wills. . But the court, not the guardian, will control the inheritance until the child reaches legal age (18 or 21). . At that time, the child will receive the entire inheritance in one lump sum. Most parents would prefer that their children inherit at a later age, but with a simple will, you have no choice; once the child reaches the age of majority, the court must distribute the entire inheritance at once. Common Mistake: Avoid Court Guardianship A court guardianship for a minor child is very similar to one for an incompetent adult. . Things move slowly and can become very expensive. . Every expenditure must be documented, audited, and approved by the court, and an attorney will need to represent the child. All of these expenses are paid from the inheritance, and because the court must do its best to treat everyone equally under the law, it is difficult to make exceptions for each child’s unique situation and needs. Correct Action: To Protect the Child and the Assets, Use a Trust Instead of using a simple will, a better option is to set up a children’s trust in a will: . This would let you name someone to manage the inheritance instead of the court. . You can also decide when the children will inherit. . But the trust cannot be funded until the will has been probated, and that can take precious time and could reduce the assets. . If you become incapacitated, this trust does not go into effect...because your will cannot be adjudicated until after you die. . And, anything that goes through probate, as these assets would, is visible the public which means predators, unscrupulous family members and nosey neighbors, know what your child inherited. The best option is a revocable living trust, the preferred option for many parents and grandparents: . The person(s) you select, not the court, will be able to manage the inheritance for your minor children or grandchildren until they reach the age(s) you want them to inherit--even if you become incapacitated. . Each child’s needs and circumstances - even special needs - can be accommodated, just as you would do yourself. . And assets that remain in the trust are protected from the courts, irresponsible spending, and creditors (even future divorce proceedings). For many folks, the absolute best solution is to keep the assets in trust for their lifetime or until assets get spent down. Assets that are protected in this manner are there for your children but can’t be taken from them. Dedicated to empowering your family, building your wealth and defining your legacy, A local attorney and father, Marc Garlett is on a mission to help parents protect what they love most. His office is located at 55 Auburn Avenue, Sierra Madre, CA 91024. Schedule an appointment to sit down and talk about ensuring a legacy of love and financial security for your family by calling 626.587.3058 or visit www.GarlettLaw.com for more information. BUSINESS TODAY The latest on Business News, Trends and Techniques All Things By Jeff Brown WHY 300,000 VOLKSWAGENS ARE BEING STORED IN THESE MASSIVE AUTO BONEYARDS. By La Quetta M. Shamblee, MBA As part of the settlement after it got caught cheating on its emissions tests, Volkswagen has bought back about 350,000 of its U.S. diesel vehicles. The automaker so far has spent more than $7.4 billion on the cars, according to court filings seen by Reuters.Where does VW put all those cars? Wherever it can find the space.The German automaker has 37 remote storage facilities across the U.S., and they’re not just parking lots. The sites include a former football stadium in the Detroit suburbs, an old paper mill in Minnesota and a giant patch of land in the California desert.A court filing seen by Reuters said that through Dec. 31, “Volkswagen had reacquired 335,000 diesel vehicles, resold 13,000 and destroyed about 28,000 vehicles. As of the end of last year, VW was storing 294,000 vehicles around the country.””These vehicles are being stored on an interim basis and routinely maintained in a manner to ensure their long-term operability and quality, so that they may be returned to commerce or exported once U.S. regulators approve appropriate emissions modifications,” VW spokeswoman Jeannine Ginivan ACCOUNTABILITY BEGINS & ENDS AT THE TOP The phrase “being thrown under the bus” is associated with blame being assigned to someone who bears little to no responsibility for that which they are being accused. In other words, someone is being held responsible for another person’s shortcomings or wrong doings. This situation is not uncommon in the work environment, and typically rears its head when someone has failed to make adequate progress or achieve a goal that was expected of them. In an effort to cover one’s butt, a co-worker or supervisor may exhibit signs of selective amnesia when faced with the reality that they have fallen short in performing their job responsibilities. It’s bad enough when this dynamic is imposed staff-to- staff employed in the same classification, but it’s truly deplorable when it is imposed by a manager, onto the staff they supervise. Managers who engage in this type of disgraceful practice are usually the first ones to take the spotlight for accomplishments that belong to others. They are eager to take credit when things are favorable, but quick to step back while pointing the finger of blame when things don’t go so well. Basically, they only want to lead when they can anticipate accolades so that they can take credit for the success. This type of behavior is a disservice to the essence of management and leadership. One of the hallmarks of great leadership is the willingness and ability to accept responsibility for everything and everyone within one’s scope of authority, the good and the bad. Individuals with solid management and leadership skills embrace the reality that every comment, action and the demeanor of their delivery will have a direct impact on how well their staff will function as a team. These managers are also willing to take the hit, accept the blame when necessary and to be accountable. This approach builds trust and facilitates loyalty among the team. Way too many work environments are filled with employees who feel a need to spend more time engaging in activities to cover their butts for fear of being held responsible for someone else’s shortcomings. Bosses with big egos and huge doses of insecurity simply can’t comprehend that that everyone on the team would do a much better job, which would make them look even better in the process, if they’d learn how to handle the management aspects of their jobs and terminate the practice of throwing staff under the bus. Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com | ||||||||||||||||||||