Opinion … Left/Right | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Views News, Pasadena Edition [Sierra Madre] Saturday, August 4, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
OPINION B3 Mountain Views News Saturday, August 4, 2018 PETER FUNT Mountain Views News PUBLISHER/ EDITOR Susan Henderson PASADENA CITY EDITOR Dean Lee EAST VALLEY EDITOR Joan Schmidt BUSINESS EDITOR LaQuetta Shamblee PRODUCTION Richard Garcia SALES Patricia Colonello 626-355-2737 626-818-2698 WEBMASTER John Aveny DISTRIBUTION Kevin Barry CONTRIBUTORS Chris Leclerc Bob Eklund Howard Hays Paul Carpenter Kim Clymer-Kelley Christopher Nyerges Peter Dills Rich Johnson Merri Jill Finstrom Rev. James Snyder Dr. Tina Paul Katie Hopkins Deanne Davis Despina Arouzman Renee Quenell Marc Garlett Keely Toten Dan Golden NEWS BY THE NUMBERS “90% of media coverage of my Administration is negative, despite the tremendously positive results we are achieving.” No need to check the math in President Trump’s recent tweet. For argument’s sake let’s say he’s correct. Fact is, “negative” reporting about him these days might even be closer to 95 percent. How could it not be? Anything written about Robert Mueller’s investigation, separating migrant children from their parents at the border, gaffe-plagued meetings with Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin, chaos among the White House staff, and worldwide turmoil related to Trump’s tariff policies - to name just a few topics - is by definition negative. So, yes, virtually 100 percent of what’s reported about those ongoing stories is negative and appropriately so. The remaining 5 or 10 percent of recent news relates mostly to employment and economic growth statistics, and could be reasonably categorized as “positive.” But the concern among journalists is not what a scorecard might show about coverage of the Trump Administration. It’s the distorted view among the president and his communications staff that journalism can be measured on a scorecard in the first place. An acknowledged fan of Fox News, the president undoubtedly embraces its ersatz slogan: “Fair and balanced.” No one would argue against fairness, but “balance” is rarely a part of journalism. Only in certain, limited situations, such as during the run-up to an election, should balance come into play. Clearly, the president wants his supporters to conflate story selection with story content, and hard news reporting with cable-TV commentary. They are simply not the same. Depressing as it might be, news tends to be negative. It is newsworthy, for example, that wildfires are ravaging California, but there’s not much news in the fact that Minnesota, at last report, was relatively fire free. The New York Times has taken to summarizing “The Week in Good News” in its Saturday edition, advising readers that, “it isn’t all bad out there.” Stories covered range from the discovery of water on Mars to the mother duck who cared for 76 ducklings. President Trump should have been pleased with the paper’s page-one lead that day: “Consumers Push Growth to 4.1% in Hot Economy.” So, it’s not all negative, but when it is don’t fault media. The president is undoubtedly riled by the volume of negative commentary on MSNBC and, to a lesser extent, on CNN. However, commentary is not news reporting, and shouldn’t be tabulated as such. Besides, for every negative opinion uttered about the administration on MSNBC there are positive spins on Fox News Channel - where “balance” exists only in slogans. Sadly, we are living at a point in time where 90-plus percent of news about the current administration is, indeed, negative. But the stories aren’t fake, they’re fact. If the president wants more positive news, he would be wise to make some. - A list of Peter Funt’s upcoming live appearances is available at www.CandidCamera. com. Peter Funt is a writer and speaker. His book, “Cautiously Optimistic,” is available at Amazon.com and CandidCamera.com. © 2018 Peter Funt. Columns distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc., newspaper syndicate. Mountain Views News has been adjudicated as a newspaper of General Circulation for the County of Los Angeles in Court Case number GS004724: for the City of Sierra Madre; in Court Case GS005940 and for the City of Monrovia in Court Case No. GS006989 and is published every Saturday at 80 W. Sierra Madre Blvd., No. 327, Sierra Madre, California, 91024. All contents are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without the express written consent of the publisher. All rights reserved. All submissions to this newspaper become the property of the Mountain Views News and may be published in part or whole. Opinions and views expressed by the writers printed in this paper do not necessarily express the views and opinions of the publisher or staff of the Mountain Views News. Mountain Views News is wholly owned by Grace Lorraine Publications, and reserves the right to refuse publication of advertisements and other materials submitted for publication. Letters to the editor and correspondence should be sent to: Mountain Views News 80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Phone: 626-355-2737 Fax: 626-609-3285 email: mtnviewsnews@aol.com LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN DICK POLMAN BLAIR BESS DEVIN NUNES: FROM DAIRY MAN TO DISGRACE After railing against the FBI, the intelligence community, and the Department of Justice, the character of Rep. Devin Nunes (R., Calif.), Chair of the House Select Committee on Intelligence, is increasingly being called into question. In fact, when character counts, the sum of the man just doesn’t add up. A new set of potential improprieties by Nunes has emerged as a result of reporting by McClatchy’s Kate Irby. Irby details possible unethical use of campaign funds by Nunes’ political action committee, New Pac. Funds used to pay for private jet transportation, tickets to sporting events, meals in high- end restaurants and hotels in Las Vegas, and $15,000 for a single day of winery tours, including a limo and beachfront hotel accommodations. Not to worry. There’s still plenty of cash in his campaign coffers. Nearly $7.4 million dollars in fact. All to mount a re-election campaign in a district in which he’s held sway since 2003. That’s a remarkably odd amount of money given that, in previous campaigns, Nunes typically raised between $1.5 - $2 million dollars. There are roughly 348,000 registered voters in Nunes’ 22nd Congressional District, which translates to about $20.11 per vote, or roughly four times the amount he spent in elections past. So why has Nunes felt compelled to fill his campaign war chest with that much money while defending a “safe seat” in a historically red bastion of the Republican party? Maybe Nunes is just a generous, likable guy who likes to spread the wealth around. So generous and likable that in March and June of 2017, he transferred $300,000 to the National Republican Congressional Campaign for contributions to various races around the country. Guess it pays to have friends. And lots of them. Especially when being investigated by an Ethics Committee dominated by fellow Republicans and having your Republican colleagues remain mum when others in government are questioning your actions. Since taking on the “Deep State” and becoming Mr. Trump’s prat boy, Nunes is now a darling among far-right conservatives throughout the country, receiving an impressive amount of small individual contributions. That’s in addition to the $63,000 he’s gotten from the Koch Brothers; $71,000 from the Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of America Association (guess Devin likes wine, remember the $15,000 tour?) and many others. And, of course, the $74,500 he garnered from California Dairies, Inc. Dairy is an important product in Nunes’ agriculture-reliant district. And yet, while riding off into the sunset, leaving his district behind on a quixotic mission to restore law and order throughout the land, his clueless leader has been imposing tariffs that will have a severe negative impact on farmers - almond, pistachio, walnut, and dairy farmers among them. Even Nunes’ father and brother’s dairy operation in Iowa will be affected. The president has called Nunes “a man of tremendous courage and grit,” who may someday be recognized as a “Great American Hero.” That comment is probably making a lot of Americans grit their teeth, among them the almond, pistachio, and walnut growers who have consistently helped return Nunes to office. According to bakersfield.com, almond growers will see tariffs on exports to China rise from 10 to 25 percent. Many of those farmers and growers might like to voice their concerns to their congressman. Good luck. Nunes reportedly hasn’t held a town hall meeting in the district in seven years. Probably because he’s been spending more time in the Deep State rather than the State of California. That dairy farm in Iowa? That’s where the Nunes Campaign Committee’s Treasurer, Toni Dian Nunes – the candidate’s mom – lives. As Treasurer for the campaign, she received a notification, earlier this year, from the Federal Election Commission requesting “information essential to full public disclosure” about three potentially illegal campaign contributions, one of which was made by a pistachio grower from a district bordering Nunes’ own. While that pistachio grower’s contribution was peanuts in comparison to that of California Dairies, it’s probably safe to assume he made it in hopes that his neighbor would stand up for him and others in his industry. Nutty thought. Devin Nunes is as wanton, wasteful, and potentially as unethical as any other swamp dweller Donald J. Trump swore to throw out of Washington. Nunes was not elected to forsake constituents for the national stage, launch inexplicable and confounding witch hunts, or stand shoulder-to- shoulder with leaders who impose tariffs that are harmful to those at home, while simultaneously putting the national security of our country at risk. Recent polls indicate Nunes is no longer meeting the expectations of his constituents. For good reason. Nunes willingly chose to lie down in the swamp, as have a significant number of his Republican colleagues in Congress. Clawing their way out may prove to be a very sticky proposition for many of them come Election Day. - Copyright 2018 Blair Bess distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. Blair Bess is a Los Angeles-based television writer, producer, and columnist. He edits the online blog Soaggragated.com, and can be reached at BBess.soaggragated@gmail.com. DONALD TRUMP AND ‘THE DEATH OF TRUTH’ The lies rain down on us so relentlessly that we’re often benumbed. Shortly after Donald Trump tweeted last week that the Russians would help the Democrats win the midterms, we learned that the Russians have tried to hack the 2018 campaign of Sen. Claire McCaskill - a Democrat. And minutes after Donald Jr. tweeted that President Obama’s economy never posted two percent GDP growth, we learned that Obama had in fact posted two percent GDP growth 15 times. Michiko Kakutani, the Pulitzer Prize-winning literary critic, has posed the questions that often bedevil us: “How did this happen? What are the roots of falsehood in the Trump era? How did truth and reason become such endangered species, and what does their impending demise portend for our public discourse and the future of our politics and governance?” She supplies the answers in her new book, “The Death of Truth,” a bleak treatise that ends with a dose of hope. Consider this my summer book recommendation. I wouldn’t necessarily take her slim volume to the beach, lest you be tempted to drown yourself. But it’s a bracing read nonetheless, because she writes so concisely and incisively, and because she draws wisdom from so many disparate influences. You’ll be hard-pressed to find another social commentator who can critique Trump and our corroded cultural-political climate by quoting both Vladimir Lenin (rhetoric should be “calculated to evoke hatred, aversion and contempt…of such a nature as to evoke the worst thoughts, the worst suspicions about the opponent”), and The Joker from Batman (“Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order and everything becomes chaos”). It’s tempting to read Kakutani only for her withering assessment of Trump, if only because it’s so on the mark: “Long before he entered politics, Trump was using lies as a business tool. He claimed that his flagship building, Trump Tower, is 68 floors high, when, in fact, it’s only 58 floors high. He also pretended to be a PR man named John Barron or John Miller to create a sock puppet who could about his - Trump’s - achievements. He lied to puff himself up, to generate business under false pretenses, and to play to people’s expectations…like most successful advertisers - and propagandists - he understood that the frequent repetition of easy- to-remember and simplistic taglines worked to embed merchandise and his name in potential customers’ minds.” But Kakutani, the newly retired New York Times book reviewer, seeks to put Trump in context. Her goal is to paint the big picture: “Trump’s unhinged presidency represents some sort of climax in the warping of reality, but the burgeoning disorientation people have been feeling…traces back to the 1960s, when society began fragmenting…The assault on truth and reason that reached fever pitch in America during the first year of the Trump presidency had been incubating for years.” She got that right. Many factors brought us to where we are today, most of them obvious only in hindsight. We’re living in the perfect storm, and Trump - its mutant byproduct, brilliantly abetted by the Russians’ exploitation of America’s fractures - is reaping the whirlwind. I’ll leave the historical details to Kakutani. Suffice it to say that the cultural schisms of the 1960s, triggered primarily by the Vietnam war and “permissive” anti-establishment lifestyles, shattered the broad national consensus. Social and political polarization accelerated with each passing decade, and the divide was exacerbated during the 1990s by the rise of conservative media (especially Rush Limbaugh). Scholars on the left and right assaulted objectivity by preaching the gospel of postmodernism. If you’re wondering what that is, Kakutani defines it as shedding objective reality to enshrine “the principle of subjectivity.” In other words, more and more people define their own factual truth by going with their gut and their biases. There’s also the internet, which she writes has “led to a cascade of misinformation and relativism, as evidenced by today’s fake news epidemic” - a fertile climate for exported Russian propaganda, what the Rand Corporation, in a report, calls “a fire hose of falsehood.” Is there any hope that America can reverse the atrophy of truth? Among the cacophony of voices in this eloquent book - everyone from John le Carre to George Washington - we get this, from fired acting attorney general Sally Yates: “Not only is there such a thing as objective truth, failing to tell the truth matters. We can’t control whether our public servants lie to us. But we can control whether we hold them accountable.” Kakutani concurs: “There are no easy remedies, but it’s essential that citizens defy the cynicism and resignation that autocrats and power-hungry politicians depend upon to subvert resistance.” Which is why the 2018 midterms are a crossroads for this country. All we have is our will to resist. - Copyright 2018 Dick Polman, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. Dick Polman is the national political columnist at WHYY in Philadelphia and a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania. Email him at dickpolman7@gmail.com. Mountain Views News Mission Statement The traditions of community news- papers and the concerns of our readers are this newspaper’s top priorities. We support a prosperous community of well- informed citizens. We hold in high regard the values of the exceptional quality of life in our community, including the magnificence of our natural resources. Integrity will be our guide. Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com | ||||||||||||||||||||