Opinion | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Views News, Pasadena Edition [Sierra Madre] Saturday, December 1, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
OPINION B3 Mountain Views News Saturday, December 1, 2018 SUSAN HENDERSON Editor/Publisher Mountain Views News PUBLISHER/ EDITOR Susan Henderson PASADENA CITY EDITOR Dean Lee EAST VALLEY EDITOR Joan Schmidt BUSINESS EDITOR LaQuetta Shamblee PRODUCTION Richard Garcia SALES Patricia Colonello 626-355-2737 626-818-2698 WEBMASTER John Aveny DISTRIBUTION Lancelot CONTRIBUTORS Mary Lou Caldwell Kevin McGuire Chris Leclerc Bob Eklund Howard Hays Paul Carpenter Kim Clymer-Kelley Christopher Nyerges Peter Dills Rich Johnson Lori Ann Harris Rev. James Snyder Dr. Tina Paul Katie Hopkins Deanne Davis Despina Arouzman Jeff Brown Marc Garlett Keely Toten Dan Golden Rebecca Wright Hail Hamilton REPUBLICANS – YOU DID THIS….OWN IT….FIX IT! This is not a column bent on demonizing Republicans. However, there are some things that I want to bring to their attention. Things that they alone can do to restore some semblance of democracy to America. First of all, Republicans have to fix whatever in the hell was wrong with their Party to allow a man who has never served anyone other than himself to become their Presidential nominee. There were 16 other people who all had impressive backgrounds and a long history of PUBLIC SERVICE that, if elected, would allow us to sleep at night. Instead you drank the Kool Aid and served up an embarassing loud mouth who not only lacks any knowledge of basic civics, is the most self serving person ever to reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. The Republican Party's fear that a woman, the most qualified Presidential candidate ever, might win, led them to go for the bull fed to them by consultants thinking that Trump, the populist if elected, would be manageable. How’s that working out for you now? Please Republican Party, get back to your roots. Get some courage and find a candidate that if elected, will serve the people of the United States, including the ones who may not have voted for him or her. Find someone, and you have plenty, who will have the best interest of all Americans at heart, has integrity and a commitment to serve. (Warning to Democrats, you need to do the same thing. This is not the time to sit back on your laurels). For right now, however, Republicans you can do a lot to rehabilitate your image and regain some of your members if you would just spend the rest of this congressional term actually taking some affirmative actions that will end this renegade administration! Hint: If you do, die hard Republicans may fall in love with you again. Here's a To Do Before 12/31/2018 List for Republicans 1. Protect Mueller from Donald J. Trump and his hit men. 2. Stand up to the tyrant. Pass a budget without adding the expensive campaign promise of that ridiculous wall. Use that money to educate our children or fix our infrastructure or help with the costs of medical care in this country. 3. Set into motion something to start reducing the spiraling deficit that Trump created. 4. Take the news cycle away from the grandstanding, lawbreaking, and lying (more than 4,000 told since he’s been President) and do something newsworthy that we care about, like passing bi partisan legislation that will improve, or at least maintain the quality of life that we have now. 5. Move your party far, far away from 45. He doesn’t represent your values. He isn’t a conservative, he isn’t fiscally responsible, and he doesn’t care about Americans, the Constitution or the rule of law. 6. And most importantly, SAVE US FROM THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS. It is too expensive and too time consuming. We need to be focusing on who the next presidential candidates will be and how to repair the damage by Trump to our democracy. How? Just show him the list below and enlighten him that the best thing for him to do is RESIGN. The List of High crimes and misdemeanors behaviors Partial - Per The Constitution 1. Perjury (This is a perhaps, but his answers to Mueller may prove that he did). 2. Abuse of Authority 3. Bribery – 4. Intimidation 5. Misuse of assets 6. Failure to supervise 7. Dereliction of duty 8. Unbecoming conduct 9. Refusal to obey a lawful order 10. Tax evasion. Pick any of the above, or maybe all of them and ‘show him the light’. Persuade him that it is better for him and his children and his empire to leave peacefully now. You can do it and just think how that will help you repair your party’s reputation. You’ll stand for something again – something other than the enabler of the worst human being to ever hold the title of President of the United States. (And don’t worry about his ‘base’, he’s double crossed them too. They’ll be on your side!) Our future is in your court. You did this. Own it. Fix it. Mountain Views News has been adjudicated as a newspaper of General Circulation for the County of Los Angeles in Court Case number GS004724: for the City of Sierra Madre; in Court Case GS005940 and for the City of Monrovia in Court Case No. GS006989 and is published every Saturday at 80 W. Sierra Madre Blvd., No. 327, Sierra Madre, California, 91024. All contents are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without the express written consent of the publisher. All rights reserved. All submissions to this newspaper become the property of the Mountain Views News and may be published in part or whole. Opinions and views expressed by the writers printed in this paper do not necessarily express the views and opinions of the publisher or staff of the Mountain Views News. Mountain Views News is wholly owned by Grace Lorraine Publications, and reserves the right to refuse publication of advertisements and other materials submitted for publication. Letters to the editor and correspondence should be sent to: Mountain Views News 80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Phone: 626-355-2737 Fax: 626-609-3285 email: mtnviewsnews@aol.com PETER FUNT BUSH-APPOINTED JUDGE CREDITS ROBERTS FOR STANDING UP TO TRUMP HARRISBURG, Pa. - John E. Jones III doesn’t look or sound much like a rebel. Like a lot of federal judges, he’s given to sober suits, long pauses, and thoughtful and deliberative sentences. But Jones, a judge of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, in the state capital of Harrisburg, is pretty much a legal apostate in our newly narrow judicial universe where all federal judges are “Obama judges,” or “Bush judges,” or “Clinton judges.” In 2005, in a case that became known as the “Dover Panda Trial,” Jones ruled that a central Pennsylvania school district’s attempt to teach intelligent design in science class violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause. In 2014, Jones beat the U.S. Supreme Court to the punch by a full year, overturning Pennsylvania’s gay marriage ban. Still, if we’re following the rules set down by President Donald Trump in his latest Jeremiad against judicial independence, then Jones, a President George W. Bush appointee, should not have ruled, as he did in Kitzmiller, that “the writings of leading [intelligent design] proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity.” And in the Trumpiverse, where judges are expected to rubber-stamp the White House’s proposals, and not act as the co-equal branch of government, there’s no way that a “Bush judge” would have offered an impassioned preamble in the same-sex marriage case about the rights of “all Pennsylvanians have the right to marry the person of their choice and consequently.” But Jones did just that. And it wasn’t because Jones was legislating from the bench. And it wasn’t because Jones decided to shred the Constitution and cast it to the four winds. It was because he took a look at the facts, the Constitution, and precedent, and made a ruling that followed the law of the land. Sometimes it’s really that simple. “It’s not that we’re going rogue, we’re deciding cases according to the law,”Jones said when I called him to ask him about Trump’s judicial broadsides, the president’s extraordinary war of words with U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, and Jones’ own concerns about attacks on judicial independence. Jones declined to comment directly on Trump, who recently groused loudly, and publicly, about a federal judge’s ruling short-circuiting the White House’s attempts to turn away a column of asylum-seekers who have now reached the southern border. But he did credit Roberts, who rebuked Trump’s attacks on the judiciary, sternly noting that “we do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.” Roberts also smartly observed that an “independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.” The chief justice’s words were “a timely statement for him to make and truly a heartfelt statement,” Jones observed. “As the functional head of the federal judiciary, to see him stand up for his judges was just terrific,” Jones said. “I think most of us [judges], if not all of us, feel that way.” Reflecting on the independence of the judiciary, Jones noted that “all we have, as is so often said, is our credibility,” he said. “We don’t have the purse and we don’t have the sword - as Alexander Hamilton said. If that credibility is destroyed and people think they can disregard the rule of law in society, then we are going to a very dangerous and dark place.” “We have an appellate system that gives everyone the opportunity to have due process if they disagree,” he continued. “Decisions themselves can be roundly criticized. It’s a free country. But when those attacks devolve into something that is personal or when a judge’s authority is questioned because we’re a co-equal branch of government, it’s problematic for all of us.” And that’s why it’s so important for people to respect the independence of the judiciary. There will be times when you don’t agree with a judge or his or her jurisprudence (and I have plenty of disagreements with the current U.S. Supreme Court), but they’re there for a reason: To make sure everyone gets a fair shake under the law. And one of these days, it might be your turn. And you won’t realize how much you miss that right to a fair shake until it’s not there anymore. “We need to dial back the inflammatory rhetoric that might not be designed to imperil judges but might have that effect,” Jones said. “We should be very careful about that.” - Copyright 2018 John L. Micek, distributed by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. An award-winning political journalist, Micek is the Opinion Editor and Political Columnist for PennLive/The Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pa. Readers may follow him on Twitter @ ByJohnLMicek and email him at jmicek@pennlive.com. GIVE TRUMP CREDIT WHEN DUE Stuck in a hotel room watching CNN the other day, I happened to catch live coverage of Donald Trump’s short speech about the “First Step Act,” concerning criminal justice reforms. I was bowled over. If I had been reading an unlabeled transcript I might have thought the speaker was Barack Obama. Imbalances and outright abuses in our criminal justice system are a plague on society. And here was Trump, the law-and-order president, urging passage of legislation to limit mandatory sentences, especially for drug offenses, and advocating new funding for sweeping anti-recidivism programs. Trump also said this: “Today’s announcement shows that true bipartisanship is possible.” Yes! He’s correct - and that’s big news. I kept expecting Trump to put his foot in his mouth by shifting to “criminals” in the migrant caravan, or ranting about “crimes” he believes were committed in election recounts. He did not. He was entirely reasonable and on message - albeit with a prepared text - about a vitally important issue. When it ended, however, I had a sinking feeling. What if mainstream media were to under play, or even ignore, this very positive news? After all, members of Trump’s team, most notably Kellyanne Conway, have stated repeatedly that media dwell on Trump’s problems and fail to give appropriate space to meaningful achievements. In the hours that followed, CNN devoted almost all of its time to “chaos” in the White House—Trump’s mood, Melania Trump’s effort to get a national security deputy fired, and charges and countercharges about the election results. The First Step Act was barely mentioned. I was able to check two broadcast networks. On NBC’s “Nightly News,” the story was covered reasonably well about eight minutes in. But the “CBS Evening News” never mentioned the story in its half-hour report. Never mentioned it! The next morning, the story was practically invisible on the nation’s front pages - with no page-one coverage in The Los Angles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune or USA Today. Only The New York Times, among papers I surveyed, stepped up, making the story its lead of the day, atop page one. In an editorial, The Times added, “In this early test, the president is signaling that he indeed wants to make progress on critical issues that enjoy broad support.” Meanwhile progressive commentator Van Jones told CNN’s Don Lemon: “I say, the 99 times I don’t agree with the president I’m going to give him hell. But on this one, I’ll give him a salute and applause.” What followed was a Twitter backlash against Jones from liberals who were troubled by praise, any praise, for Trump. Jones replied via Twitter: “There are 200,000 people behind bars. They have no hope, no help. We haven’t passed a bill to help them in almost two generations.” The president himself has noted that he could work with the new Democratic majority in the House on many issues, from drug prices, to repairing infrastructure and, yes, on criminal justice reform. Trump’s opponents along with media who cover the White House objectively must walk a fine line. They should criticize him when he deserves it and must hold him accountable for his many misstatements. But they can’t succumb to temporary blindness when the news is positive. As the second half of Trump’s term begins, reforms are needed in criminal justice - and also in how politicians and media conduct themselves on the rare occasions when good news happens at the White House. - A list of Peter Funt’s upcoming live appearances is available at www.CandidCamera. com. Peter Funt is a writer and speaker. His book, “Cautiously Optimistic,” is available at Amazon.com and CandidCamera.com. © 2018 Peter Funt. Columns distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc., newspaper syndicate. JOHN L. MICEK Mountain Views News Mission Statement The traditions of community news- papers and the concerns of our readers are this newspaper’s top priorities. We support a prosperous community of well- informed citizens. We hold in high regard the values of the exceptional quality of life in our community, including the magnificence of our natural resources. Integrity will be our guide. Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com | ||||||||||||||||||||