OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, December 25, 2021
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, December 25, 2021
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
JESUS OR TEGWAR
It’s 5 a.m. and I am thinking about an old baseball
movie called Band the Drum Slowly starring Robert De
Niro as a simpleminded catcher who has difficulty con
necting with others. The other players mock the naïve
and trusting nature of the De Niro character and con
spire to lure him into a card game called “TEGWAR”, an
abbreviation for “The Exciting Game without Any Rules”.
The only point of the game is to create rules for the single-
minded purpose of taking advantage of the weaker De
Niro character. The film is probably intended as a meta
phor for world history and had a personal poignancy for
me. The theme of the film connected with the revelation
of my son’s developmentally disabled person diagnosis. A few years later, his mother
moved away and I became his single parent of my son and daughter thinking about
how I could explain the Rules of Life to them and to myself.
I have been thinking about this kind of question for most of my life. Raising
my son and daughter brought this nonsensical teaching home for discussion never
debate. My son, before he even went to school told me he that he didn’t want to be
a “birdie”. He meant “burden” and I emphasized with all the power that I had that
people such as he who had disabilities such as he, were special people who were kind
of a gift to others. People had different abilities but no matter the differences being
alive was a pretty wonderful thing and underneath we were all equal. He understood
me and when he went to School, supplied with a fully packed lunch, he would be very
hungry when he got home. It took a while but I eventually realized that he would
give much of his lunch away to other students. He explained to me that he knew he
would get more food when he got home and that many other kids were hungry and
were unsure of when they would eat again. Perhaps Jesus would have approved of his
behavior but I didn’t. I did my best to explain why what seemed so unfair was really
not his problem but I never succeeded very well.
Within a few years my son and daughter had living with us two friends of my
sons who needed a place to live. They paid no rent but added a great deal to all of our
lives. When my son passed high school age and my daughter was going off to College
I concurrently met the woman who became my future wife and who will hopefully
proofread this article today, thirty years later. As she moved in it became obvious
that changes had to be made. I urged my son and his friend to move into one of the
apartments I owned that was rented to the organizers of a group of disabled people
in which my son happily participated. As a part of this group my son was flown to
Washington D.C. and the group performed at Bill Clinton’s Presidential inauguration
in 1992. I expected rent from these organizers which would be paid at some future
time but never was. This failure was not by design and future payments were promised
to pay “soon”; but “soon” never came. Surprise, surprise! Eventually, the apartments
were lost to bankruptcy but the benefits conferred upon my son, to my mind at
least, outweighed any financial losses. Let’s face it. I, also, have never been very clear
on what rules or non-rules to follow.
As we enter 2022, I am still confused. Of course I write these published articles
every week without pay and feel very privileged to have this opportunity. I
am very privileged living with my wife in our large house in this wonderfully safe
Sierra Madre canyon community. I am retired comfortably and bemoan the inequality,
hierarchy, dominion and misery that covers the world. As confusing as things as
I know my family, all of whom I see several times a week, are still fortunate. But then
what about the future? What are the rules to follow? Although what I call “Tegwar”
by which I mean pursuing only self-interest appears to be the path to foreseeable
complete disaster. My hope and belief is that the teachings of the Judeo-Christian
ethic and the other great world religions will utilize technology to illuminate the human
race enabling the world to find the communal path necessary for a prolonged,
even if not perpetual, survival. That is my hope and prayer as we enter this new year!.
BE SAFE.
TOM PURCELL
THE MERRY RETURN OF
CHRISTMAS CARDS
Christmas card trends are telling — they speak to the mood
of the country — and this year’s trend offers some positive
news.
According to the Washington Post, hand-written “snailmailed”
Christmas cards are all the rage, particularly among
millennials who all of the sud-den are spending more on
Christmas cards than baby boomers.
We baby boomers came of age well before everything went
digital.
I still have and cherish the hilarious hand-written letters my friends and I shared
during our college years in the ‘80s, when we were spread all over the nation.
One of my most prized possessions is a letter my grandfather wrote in 1921. He
died when my dad was only 3 years old, but the old letter offers a connection to
the grandfather I wished I had got to meet.
For a long time, Christmas-card writing was a big social event.
The card itself didn’t matter so much as the funny notes my friends would write
and the pleasure and enjoyment we would experience when the cards arrived in
the mail.
I can’t recall the last time I wrote and snail-mailed a letter to a friend. And I likewise
stopped hand-writing Christmas cards long ago, as most of my friends have.
Maybe millennials will inspire us to resume the annual practice.
They came of age in the digital world, where everything — even Christmas cards
— is automated and bulk mailed.
Every year, companies send out generic mass-printed cards to employees and
customers, and every year the cards, which took no effort to produce and therefore
evoke zero emotion in their recipients, are tossed unopened into the trash.
Millennials are taking an entirely opposite approach to Christmas cards.
“Lindsey Roy, chief marketing officer of Hallmark, which has more than 3,600
holiday cards in its lineup, says millennials are looking for special cards for important
people in their lives,” reports the Post.
“’They have teachers to thank, or caregivers,” Roy tells the Post. “They want to
find the card that is exactly right, and they are willing to pay a bit more if they like
the design and it says the right thing.’”
To get the right card with the right message — to create a card that stands out in
a stack of junk mail — they’re using foil-lined envelopes, decorative tape, vintage
postage stamps and more.
Technology offers new opportunities to share authentic messages.
“Hallmark’s new Sign & Send service allows users to compose a handwrit-ten
message on paper, snap a photo of it and upload it,” reports the Post.
Sign & Send users also can send cards with QR codes that the recipient can scan
with a smartphone and see the personalized multimedia content.
Whatever the approach, millennials are willing to pay up to 6 bucks per card to
prove that they went to great lengths to show their gratitude and affection to their
recipients.
This year’s upward Christmas card trend may appear to be a small matter.
But in a digital world in which so many are experiencing increasing social isolation,
increasing rudeness and incivility, and increasing inhumanity, I think it’s a
wonderful step in the right direction.
It offers a nice and badly needed human touch that we can all use more of.
Better yet, the combination of technology and thoughtfulness offers an opportunity
for humor.
Send a card maker a photo of your cat and the company can create a cus-tom
Christmas card that says cheery things, such as “Meowy Christmas from my
humans!”
–Tom Purcell is an author and humor columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
Email him at Tom@TomPurcell.com.
STAY SAFE!
GET VACCINATED!
WEAR A MASK!
RICH JOHNSON NOW THAT’S RICH
ORIGINAL MOVIE TITLES
My daughter, Olivia, has indicated I need to set
aside 8 hours so we can watch the three existing
“Matrix” films to reacquaint ourselves just before
we watch the brand spanking new fourth “Matrix”
movie. (By the way, I think “The Matrix” is a documentary
lol. It’s not fiction.)
Anyway, staying close to my commitment to outfit
you with useable and or, useless trivia, I went into
the wayback machine and researched some mildly interesting trivia
(well interesting for me anyway). The trivia? Original title of well-
known movies. So here goes:
“Pretty Woman” The Richard Gere/Julia Roberts film was originally
called “3,000”. Apparently, that was the amount of money offered
to Julia Robert’s lady of the evening character to spend a week with
Richard Gere’s character.
“Saturday Night Fever” This film classic was based on a New York
Magazine article by a journalist who toured the dance club scene of
Brooklyn. Had the producers stayed with the journalist’s article title,
we would remember John Travolta’s breakout movie as “The Tribal
Rites of the New Saturday Night”.
“Blade Runner” taken from a story by Philip K. Dick, which, if used
we would remember as “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep”
“Some Like it Hot” The 1960 Billy Wilder classic starring Marilyn
Monroe, Tony Curtis and Jack Lemon was originally titled “Not Tonight
Josephine”.
“Alien” This scary classic from 1979 was going to be known as ”Star
Beast”. Thank goodness they changed it “Star Beast” sounds like a
Disney movie.
“Back to the Future” Get this. The studio wanted it to be called
“Spaceman From Pluto”. Many of us believe Christopher Lloyd may
very well be an alien (That’s a compliment by the way).
“Big” the wonderful Tom Hanks movie was originally titled “When
I Grow Up”. The problem was they couldn’t find a director or a star
who would sign on with the title.
“Field of Dreams” This Kevin Costner classic was originally titled
“Shoeless Joe” adapted from the novel “Shoeless Joe” by W.P. Kinsella.
Using that name made sense, but to studio execs it wouldn’t
make cents.
“Tangled” The Disney hit’s original title would cause the film to lose
half its audience…BOYS. That’s what the Disney execs surmised
when they changed the original name “Rapunzel Unbraided”.
“Casablanca” This iconic Humphrey Bogart/Ingrid Bergman classic
was Warner Bros retooling of a stage play about an upscale Moroccan
nightclub. The name of the play? “Everybody Comes to Rick’s”
“Goodfellas” Scorsese’s mob classic was supposed to be named after
the book it was based on; The problem was Brian DePalma already
made a movie with that name. And there was a TV series with the
name. The name? Oh yeah, “Wiseguy”.
“American Pie” This film actually had two other names. One was
“East Great Falls High”. The other name was…are you ready?.... are
you sure?... Okay, here goes: “Teenage Sex Comedy That Can Be
Made For Under $10 million That Your Reader Will Love But The
Executive Will Hate”
Last minute additions:
“Wind-Up Heroes” became “Toy Story”
“The Lunch Club” became “The Breakfast Club”
“Affairs of the Heart” became “Fatal Attraction”
“Love Hurts” became “Basic Instincts”
“Hunter” became “Predator”
“Watch the Skies” became “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”
And last and certainly not least…
“Night Skies” became “E.T.”
Have a wonderful week. Me? I’ll be watching “The Matrix”.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|