OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, February 5, 2022
13 OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, February 5, 2022
13
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
A POSSIBLE LESSON LEARNED
On Sunday my son and I went up to a friend’s house to watch
the National Football League Divisional playoffs. There
were some people present that I had not seen for years.
Once masks were removed I could see the same smiles but
when hats came off balding heads presented themselves. My
friend’s stepson reminded me of how I had assisted him in
being accepted at one of the Magnet High schools which
had previously rejected him. At that time I was good friends
with some powerful people and at his request I contacted
them and very soon he was accepted. He explained that this
acceptance led to a major change in his life. The other accepted
students were people who took their life and their
studies very seriously and he learned to do the same. Twenty years later he has a very
responsible position and is very conscientious in performing his duties.
Hooray for him and, likewise, hooray for me. I asked him many questions about
his life and he was very forthright in his answers. After he and most of the other people
left I could tell that something was wrong in the way the stepfather & owner of the house
related to me. On Monday I called my old friend and asked him if there was a problem.
He hesitantly explained that my behavior was inappropriate and rude. My questions to
people required answers that were personal and that should never be addressed in public.
He explained that if someone wanted to talk about personal subjects it was up to that person
to bring it up. He went on to say that I had no boundaries and that was why people
were often uncomfortable around me.
Frankly I was crushed and hurt. This is not the first time I had heard such criticism
but I generally laugh it off. I always want to know how people feel about things and
ask why they have made certain decisions. An example of that behavior is my frequent
questioning of friends about how they have made the decision not to have children. One
friend in response to that question condescendingly explained that although he had been
happily married for over twenty years the question had never been discussed. He said it
was like asking why he and his wife did not go to Paris for lunch. Even to me, it seemed
clear that he didn’t want to talk about it; but, nevertheless, I seem to repeat the question.
This question about what is appropriate behavior has been on my mind all week.
I picked up this week’s issue of THE WEEK magazine and read on page 10 an interview
Francoise Giolot the former partner of Pablo Picasso later married to Jonas Salk, devel
oper of the polio vaccine. She has now reached the age of 100 and is a celebrated artist her
self. In all her relationships, she says, she kept something of herself hidden. “You should
not make yourself known that much to other people and should keep your most intimate
thoughts to yourself.” Perhaps not surprisingly, this was real news to me.
I started this morning off, as I customarily do by watching “Democracy Now”
Today, there were only two subjects. First a discussion of Whoopi Goldberg’s unfortunate
comment that she did not believe the holocaust was an example of racial prejudice but
was simply an example of man’s inhumanity to man. You know just an example of one
group of White People clashing with another group of White People. The next segment
of the show was an interview of the cartoonist Art Seligman creator of the Pulitzer Prize
winning graphic novel “Maus”, a description of the horrors inflicted upon Jews by Hitler’s
Germany. I had the book around the house and picked it up and read the introduction:
“The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but they are not human.” Adolf Hitler
Putting both segments of the show together it is understandable why many people
were profoundly upset by Whoopi’s statement and the consequences to her could have
easily been more severe than the two week suspension she received. Whoopi has attempted
to apologize at least three times and says she now understands that what seems
right to her might be insulting to someone else. She says she will try to educate herself
more before she opens her mouth.
The point of this article is my attempt to explain that I, too, must learn this same
lesson. Rather than saying or asking about whatever pops into my head it may be best to
consider the effect that my words might have on other people. This will be quite a change.
DICK POLMAN
CLARENCE AND GINNI THOMAS, POSTER
COUPLE FOR HIGH COURT CORRUPTION
When word spread last week about an imminent Supreme Court
retirement, I hoped against hope that it would be Clarence Thomas.
No such luck.
Replacing Clinton appointee Stephen Breyer with a Biden appoin
tee is really no biggie. Ridding the court of Clarence, and his blatant
conflicts of interest, would be a major upgrade – at least in terms of repairing
the court’s record-low reputation. Because for more than 20 years it has been an open
secret, and a patent disgrace, that wife Ginni has been a right-wing activist working
on a range of hot button issues on which hubby sits in judgement.
Perhaps it’s sheer coincidence that he was the lone dissenter in the 8-1 ruling that
bars Donald Trump from blocking the release of documents about the Jan. 6 insurrection
– the same event that Ginni agitated for on Facebook, the same event to
which she helped send busloads of insurrectionists. At the very least, it sure looks
bad. In fact, the official Code of Judicial Conduct, embedded in federal law, specifically
states that “any justice, judge, or magistrate judges of the United States shall
disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be
questioned” by a reasonable, objective person.
Yup, the code says “any justice.” Problem is, the Supremes exempt themselves from
the code.
There are no Supreme Court rules governing conflict of interest. The justices police
themselves, which of course means that, in practice, they don’t police themselves at
all. All other federal judges in all the lower courts are inhibited from putting themselves
in any situation that might convey an appearance of impropriety. But not the
nine folks at the top of the pyramid.
That’s long been a great deal for Clarence and Ginni. As far back as December 2000,
while the high court was weighing whether to stop the Florida recount and award
the White House to George W. Bush (which it did, with Clarence voting in the 5-4
majority), Ginny, as a staffer at the conservative Heritage Foundation, was already
screening resumes for the incoming Bush administration. A decade later, Clarence
sat in judgement of Obamacare while Ginni was earning roughly $165,000 working
for several groups that lobbied to repeal Obamacare. During the Trump administration,
Ginni worked closely with (and was paid by) a prominent anti-immigrant activist
who filed amicus briefs defending Trump’s Muslim travel ban – while Clarence
was hearing cases about the travel ban.
The conflict of interest episodes are too numerous to list here. Suffice it to say that
Clarence steadfastly refused to recuse himself, despite repeated demands over the
years that he do so. It’s a blatant breach of judicial ethics – and the all-important
perception of impartial justice – that he’s still on the bench when gay rights cases get
debated (Ginni is on record railing against “transsexual fascists”), and when national
security cases get weighed (Ginni is on record railing against “the Deep State”).
Last year, a bipartisan coalition of 107 law professors from 76 law schools asked
Congress to require that all federal judges with perceived conflicts at least explain in
writing the reasons why they’d refused to recuse themselves. A tepid reform, for sure.
But right now Clarence doesn’t have to explain anything.
The only available constitutional remedy is for the House to target the guy with an
impeachment probe. Democrats, who run the Judiciary Committee, could subpoena
Ginni and ask pointed questions about her actions on behalf of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists.
With that matter under investigation, Clarence might actually be compelled
to recuse himself on all Jan. 6-related cases. But alas, as we all well know, hand-
wringing Democrats shrink from that kind of hardball.
So I suppose there’s only one solution. President Biden, having pledged to replace
Breyer with a well-qualified Black woman, should simply announce that his choice is
Anita Hill. Having long survived Clarence Thomas’ sexual harassment, the attorney
and law professor is rested and ready.
Perhaps forcing Clarence to share the bench with Hill would be sufficient impetus
for him to quit.
Dick Polman, a veteran national political columnist based in Philadelphia and a
Writer in Residence at the University of Pennsylvania, writes at DickPolman.net.
Email him at dickpolman7@gmail.com
RICH JOHNSON NOW THAT’S RICH
WILL ROGERS ON AMERICA
I’m a big fan of Will Rogers.
Will Rogers, a humorist and political commentator,
began his career circa 1901 as a trick roper
in a Wild West Show, first in South Africa and
then Australia. Returning to the U.S. in 1904 he
performed his trick roping act on the vaudeville
circuits. At one such western show in New York
City a wild steer broke out of the arena at Madi
son Square Garden and started making its way
up into the viewing stands.
Will roped the steer to the delight of the crowd and that feat got him
front page attention from the New York Newspapers. He ended up in
New York’s Ziegfeld’s Follies where he performed his rope tricks and
provided a nightly monologue on current events. Twirling his lasso
evenings on stage in his cowboy outfit he said, “Well, what shall I talk
about? I ain’t got anything funny to say. All I know is what I read in the
papers”.
He pre-wrote his epitaph and it is memorable to this day: “When I die,
my epitaph or whatever you call those signs on gravestones is going to
read: ‘I joked about every prominent man of my time, but I never met a
man I dident (sic) like.’ I am so proud of that I can hardly wait to die so it
can be carved. And when you come to my grave you will find me sitting
there, proudly reading it.”
Will commented on many facets of American life that are still relevant
today:
National Debt: “…Let’s sell off enough of this country to somebody and
pay off all national debts, then the taxes wouldn’t be nearly as much. The
Democrats will agree to peddle Texas and Florida. And I am certain the
republicans will let Massachusetts and Rhode Island go.” (December 16,
1928)
War and Peace: “I have a scheme for stopping war. It’s this – no nation
is allowed to enter a war till they have paid for the last one.” (August 29,
1928)
Politics: “Politics ain’t nothing but reciprocity, you know. Congress will
vote for anything if the thing they vote for will turn around and vote for
them.” (October 12, 1935)
Politicians: “I’m just like a politician – the less I know about anything,
the more I can say.” (January 27, 1935)
Presidents: “It’s a tough life, this thing of being President and trying to
please everybody – well, not exactly everybody, but enough to be reelected.”
(September 22, 1929)
U.S. Congress: “There is an old legend that years ago there was a man
elected to Congress who voted according to his own conscience.” (1919)
U.S. Congress: “Congress meets tomorrow morning. Let us all pray. Oh,
Lord, give us strength to bear that which is about to be inflicted upon
us. Be merciful with them oh, Lord, for they know not what they are
doing. Amen.”
U.S. Government: “We got a long-sighted government. When everybody
has got money, they cut taxes, and when they’re broke, they raise
‘em. That’s statesmanship of the highest order.” (March 27, 1932)
Will was one of the truly great Americans. His humor helped our country
weather through the early years of the Great Depression.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|