11
OPINION
Mountain Views-News Saturday, January 1, 2011
HAIL Hamilton My Turn
STUART Tolchin..........On LIFE
Mountain
Views
News
Publisher/ Editor
Susan Henderson
City Editor
Dean Lee
Sales
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
Art Director
Allison Kirkham
Production Assistant
Richard Garcia
Photography
Jacqueline Truong
Lina Johnson
Contributors
Teresa Baxter
Pat Birdsall
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Stuart Tolchin
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Chris Bertrand
Mary Carney
La Quetta Shamblee
Glenn Lambdin
Greg Wellborn
Ralph McKnight
Trish Collins
Pat Ostrye
Editorial Cartoonist
Ann Cleaves
Webmaster
John Aveny
NOT EVERYTHING CHANGES
Stop Drinking Bottled
Water - that’s my
New Year’s Resolution
My wife has this sometimes
wonderful job, a part of which is
to arrange reunions. She characterizes
the different groups
she works with as exhibiting
specific characteristics. I recall
her saying that the old grads
who fought in the Wars often express a kind of
“How can we help you to make this great?” while
other groups express a kind of, “What can you do
for us?” attitude. Well, my fifty-year High School
Reunion is this year and I’ve been trying to sort
out my feelings as to what kind of group we were
and whether I want to attend.
I think the entire graduating class numbered
about 500. Included were teenagers who were
already famous or soon to be famous. One was
already known from TV as a Mouseketeer, (I really
didn’t know her). Other classmates were
soon to be stars of their own TV series and minor
movie-stars. Many classmates claim to have
known these people,e but at the time I don’t remember
any strong associations. Another classmate
became Lieutenant Governor after a career
as a rock-impresario, but I can’t say I knew him
either. The Queen of our Prom became a kind of
Buddhist Monk and, I think, a pretty important
person within her sect. I got to know her a little
better after high-school and recall that she was
quite cute but not particularly interested in being
sexual with me. In fact, I think, this typifies a
lot of the girls who loosely belonged to my group.
They were all young, many were attractive, and as
far as I knew, none were particularly interested in
having sex with me.
These are not particularly pleasant memories.
There were cool kids; hip and aware but I was not
a part of that. Remember - this was still 1961. It
was, for most of us nice Jewish kids, pre-drugs and
pre-sex and being on the outside. Yes drugs, college,
and civil rights were right around the corner
and attitudes were about to change but for the moment
my group was hopelessly behind the times,
still concerned with material values, SAT scores
and getting away from home. Let me share a more
personal glimpse of myself with you. In my senior
year I was about a year younger than everyone
else because Chicago’s Elementary School system
had double- promoted (we called it skipping) me
two times. Although I have always been kind of
proud of this fact and manage to sneak it into conversations
where it has little relevance (I see my
mother-in-law doing the same thing as she tells
disinterested people how her otherwise undistinguished
son-in-law {me) skipped three grades)
it was probably a socially disastrous occurrence.
Not only was I younger than everyone else but I
was also immature, over-protected, financially
hopelessly deprived and generally clueless. By the
middle of the twelfth grade I had never been out
alone with a girl. In my Shakespeare Class (yes in
pre-computer times we had Shakespeare classes)
the annoying Jewish girls of my group would pass
notes around me to Barbara who for some reason
obviously liked me. Unfortunately I found her attention
and their attentions bewildering, annoying,
and possibly frightening. I felt like all these
Jewish girls were trying to control me (what a surprise)
and I didn’t like it. I knew they all wanted
me to ask Barbara to the Prom and even though
I didn’t know what I wanted to do I knew I didn’t
want to be controlled by them. This is a pattern
which, for better or worse, I have repeatedly followed
during my life.
Anyway, after one of these days of note-passing
I rebelled. After English Class I asked this beautiful,
tall, Gentile girl to go to the Prom with me and
she said yes. Why do I keep mentioning this Jewish/
Gentile stuff?. It’s kind of hard to believe but
at that time and at our particular high-school in
the San Fernando Valley, and without anyone ever
even talking about it, it was well understood that
Jews and Gentiles were almost separate species
who barely spoke the same language and did not
interact. This rule was not universal and did not
apply to athletes, musicians, and dummies; but for
my group that was the rule and that was the problem.
Within our group we were too similar to be
of interest to one another and leaving the group
was generally too frightening and, in 1961, almost
unthinkable.
Since 1961 the ways of society have changed
many times. Old barriers (like religious, racial,
and sexual ones) seem to have fallen. It is a new
and different time and perhaps, like many other
people, I am mainly interested in interacting with
people - different kinds of people who represent
the future - rather than the same old people who
are memories of an undistinguished past. I still
don’t want to be controlled by anyone, but I need
someone to tell me what to do next as I approach
retirement and other potentially frightening
events. I have yet to decide about going to the Reunion.
I guess some things don’t change.
I’m sure everybody’s asked the question:
What can I do to protect and improve the environment?
Here’s my answer and my resolution
for the new year: I will stop drinking bottled water ($11.7 billion
in U.S. sales last year) and use tap water instead. It can be filtered
but not bottled. I will even insist on tap water when eating out. No
more little plastic bottles of H2O with French-sounding nature-
friendly names. If the restaurant doesn’t have water on tap, I’ll eat
somewhere else.
I figure not drinking bottled water is going to save me a whole
bunch of money, improve my health, and help the environment a
lot more than just “recycling” plastic bottles. Here’s why:
Regulation: In fact, both regulation and enforcement of bottled
water safety is weaker than of tap water safety. Federal, state, and
local environmental agencies require rigorous testing of tap water
safety. Be sure to check the label and look for “from a municipal
source” or “community water system”, which just means it is tap
water.
Safety: American tap water is among the safest in the world, and
as much as 40% of the bottled sold in in the U.S. is just filtered tap
water. By drinking tap water, you can avoid the fertilizer, pharmaceuticals,
disinfectants, and other chemicals found in bottled water.
Organic contaminants often found in bottled water, such as E coli,
is thought to be the result of bottlers removing chlorine, a powerful
anti-bacterial agent, for reasons of taste.
Carcinogens: DEHP is part of a chemical group called phthalates,
which are used to produce plastic, including water bottles
made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET), identifiable by the
number 1 on the bottom of the bottle. These chemicals are potential
human cancer agents that can leach from the plastic into the
water, even under normal conditions.
Oil: Producing plastic bottles uses energy and emits toxic chemicals.
Making bottles to meet Americas’ demand for bottled water
required the equivalent of more than 17.6 million barrels of oil last
year -- enough fuel for more than a million U.S. cars for a year
-- and generated more than 2.5 million tons of carbon dioxide
contributing to global warming. Transportation to deliver bottled
water burns additional fossil fuels and emits more CO2, the most
abundant greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere.
Money: Bottled water costs significantly more than tap water.
Ninety percent of the cost of bottled water is in the bottle itself. For
the $2 you spend on a liter of bottled water you can get about 1,000
gallons of tap water. If taste is an issue use a water filter -- Poor taste
is most often the result old or poorly maintained plumbing.
Garbage: North Americans use over twenty-eight billion plastic
water bottles per year; 88% of these bottles end up in landfills or
wash into the ocean instead of being recycled. That amounts to two
million tons of PET plastic bottles piling up under new housing
tracts or floating out to sea (adding to the largest collection of plastic
bottles, and other plastic products, permanently circling in the
middle of the Pacific Ocean).
Water Privatization: Water extraction for bottled water leads to
local water shortages affecting nearby communities and farmers.
Water bottlers deplete aquifers and other groundwater sources,
and harm local economies by paying too little for the water they
take. Contracts often give preference to water bottlers over the
town’s ratepayers because the company can draw the maximum
amount of water it wants, regardless of drought or water shortage.
This year the township of Bundanoon, New South Wales, Australia
became the first bottled water-free city on the planet. Its citizens
voluntarily chose to ban bottled water in response to a bottling
company’s desire to extract millions of liters of water from
the local aquifer. The initiative for a bottled water-free town was
proposed by local businessman Huw Kingston and carried out by
the grassroots organization, Bundy On Tap. In a community meeting
of 356 of the town’s 2,500 residents, all but one voted in favor
of the ban. According to Bundy, it is now prohibited to sell or give
away bottled water anywhere within the town limits.
Following the lead of our friends Down Under, I propose that
the City of Sierra Madre adopt a similar ban on bottled water. It
would give us the distinction of being the second city on the planet,
and the first city in the U.S. to do so. Banning bottled water sure
makes more sense than the noise ordinance on gasoline blowers
and anti-smoking ban we passed last year. I think it’s high time
residents of Sierra Madre stop talking the talk about protecting the
environment and start walking the walk. I’ll do my part. Will you?
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 55 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 302, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do not
necessarily express the views
and opinions of the publisher
or staff of the Mountain
Views News.
Mountain Views News
is wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should be
sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
RICH Johnson
2011 Stock Market Strategy
I must admit I have never
invested in the stock market.
All my investing dollars
have been funneled into a
rather dubious and questionable
company. That would be
mine. The jury is still out on
whether this strategy was the
keenest use of my dollars. I
may never know. My heirs will ultimately be the
better judge of my decisions along the way. And
since there have been no close calls with runaway
buses, or failing brakes on my car, I think
my heirs are somewhat satisfied for the moment.
Still, I’ve adopted a cautious wait and see posture.
Not that I don’t recommend prudent investing.
Since I have climbed up on this soapbox
and started dispensing advice, suggestions, and
blither, I have never tendered investment strategies.
And why not? I thought what better time
and place to diversify (that’s a investment term.)
So, I did peruse the Wall Street Journal, Baron’s,
Forbes, and that 8-ball thingy you turn upside
down for answers to life’s difficult questions.
And I have honed a 2011 stock market report
and investment strategy. Please bear in mind I
have no idea what I am talking about. Adopting
a approach 180 degree in the opposite direction
to any suggestions I make is very likely the most
sensible response. Anyway, here is my priceless
stock report:
Helium was up.
Feathers were down.
Paper was stationery.
Fluorescent tubing was dimmed in light
trading.
Knives were up sharply.
Cows steered into a bull market.
Pencils lost a few points.
Hiking equipment was trailing.
Elevators rose, while escalators continued
their slow decline.
Weights were up in heavy trading.
Light switches were off.
Mining equipment hit rock bottom.
Diapers remain unchanged.
Shipping lines stayed at an even keel.
The market for raisins dried up.
Coca Cola fizzled.
Caterpillar stock inched up a bit.
Sun peaked at midday.
Balloon prices were inflated.
Scott Tissue touched new bottom.
And batteries exploded in an attempt to re
charge the market.
I would like to publicly thank my friend Jeff for
help in pouring through all the data formulating
this valuable treatise. His investment strategies
have done him well over the years except for
possibly the investment of time in certain friendships.
I just can’t see how that has helped him all
that much. Be well.
City of Sierra Madre
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
To: Citywide
From: The City of Sierra Madre
Subject: MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 11-01 (MCTA
11-01) REPEALING SECTION 17.68.050 (OFF-STREET PARKING
DISTRICTS) OF CHAPTER 17.68 OF THE SIERRA MADRE
MUNICIPAL CODE
The City of Sierra Madre gives notice, pursuant to State of California
law, that the Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to
consider an amendment to the Sierra Madre Municipal Code, repealing
Section 17.68.050 (Off-Street Parking Districts) of Chapter 17.68.
The proposed amendment would rescind Section 17.68.050 from the
Code, thereby removing this provision which allows an applicant for
a building or zoning permit to pay a sum of two thousand dollars per
parking space, in lieu of providing any or all of the off-street parking
spaces required for a project.
DATE AND TIME OF HEARING PLACE OF HEARING
City of Sierra Madre City of Sierra Madre
Planning Commission meeting City Council Chambers
Thursday January 6, 2011 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd.
(Hearing begins at 7:00 p.m.) Sierra Madre, CA
All interested persons may attend this meeting and the Planning
Commission will hear them with respect thereto.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This Municipal Code text
amendment qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under Section
15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
the Code text amendment is not a project and it can be seen with
certainty that it will not have a significant effect on the environment.
APPEAL: The Planning Commission recommendation will automatically
be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. If in
the future anyone wishes to challenge the decision of the Planning
Commission in court, one may be limited to raising the issues that
were raised or presented in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Commission at, or before, the scheduled public hearing.
For further information on this subject, please contact the Development
Services Department at (626) 355-7135.
By Order of the City Council
Danny Castro, Director of Development Services
Mountain Views
News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
the community
newspaper and
the concerns of
our readers are
this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence
of our natural
resources. Integrity
will be our guide.
What
Do YOU
Think?
We’d like to hear from you!
Contact us at: editor@mtnviewsnews.com
or www.facebook.com/mountainviewsnews
|