13
THE WORLD AROUND US
Mountain Views News Saturday, August 20, 2011
ALIEN WORLD BLACKER THAN COAL
Astronomers have discovered the darkest
known exoplanet—a distant, Jupiter-sized gas
giant known as TrES-2b. Their measurements
show that TrES-2b reflects less than one percent
of the starlight falling on it, making it blacker than
coal or any planet or moon in our solar system.
“TrES-2b is considerably less reflective than
black acrylic paint, so it’s truly an alien world,”
said astronomer David Kipping of the Harvard-
Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, lead author
on the paper reporting the research.
In our solar system, Jupiter is swathed in
bright clouds of ammonia that reflect more than
a third of the sunlight reaching it. In contrast,
TrES-2b (which was discovered in 2006 by the
Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey, or TrES) lacks
reflective clouds due to its high temperature.
TrES-2b orbits its star at a distance of only
three million miles. The star’s intense light heats
TrES-2b to a temperature of more than 1,800
degrees Fahrenheit—much too hot for ammonia
clouds. Instead, its exotic atmosphere contains
light-absorbing chemicals like vaporized sodium
and potassium, or gaseous titanium oxide. Yet
none of these chemicals fully explain the extreme
blackness of TrES-2b.
“It’s not clear what is responsible for making this
planet so extraordinarily dark,” stated co-author
David Spiegel of Princeton University. “However,
it’s not completely pitch black. It’s so hot that it
emits a faint red glow, much like a burning ember
or the coils on an electric stove.”
Kipping and Spiegel determined the reflectivity
of TrES-2b using data from NASA’s Kepler
spacecraft. Kepler is designed to measure
the brightnesses of distant stars with extreme
precision.
The team monitored the brightness of the
TrES-2 system as the planet orbited its star. They
detected a subtle dimming and brightening due to
the planet’s changing phase.
TrES-2b is believed to be tidally locked, like
our moon, so one side of the planet always faces
the star. And like our moon, the planet shows
changing phases as it orbits its star. This causes
the total brightness of the star plus planet to vary
slightly.
“By combining the impressive precision from
Kepler with observations of over 50 orbits, we
detected the smallest-ever change in brightness
from an exoplanet: just 6 parts per million,”
said Kipping. “In other words, Kepler was able
to directly detect visible light coming from the
planet itself.”
The extremely small fluctuations proved that
TrES-2b is incredibly dark. A more reflective
world would have shown larger brightness
variations as its phase changed.
TrES-2b orbits the star GSC 03549-02811,
which is located about 750 light-years away in the
direction of the constellation Draco. (One light-
year is about 6 trillion miles.)
Although TrES-2b currently is the darkest
known planet, similar worlds orbiting other
stars undoubtedly await discovery. For now, it
reinforces the awareness that our solar system
may not be as typical as we once thought. An
astounding variety of worlds may populate our
galaxy, making it more mysterious and wondrous
than we ever imagined.
The Kepler space telescope has located more
than 1,200 planetary candidates in its field of view.
Additional analysis will reveal whether any other
unusually dark planets lurk in that data.
You can contact Bob Eklund at: b.eklund@
MtnViewsNews.com.
Ask jai……
Ask jai is a weekly column that will strive to honestly answer your job search questions relating to job
searching techniques, networking skills, resume writing and interviewing. The employment situation is getting
better, however, it is still a challenge finding were the jobs are located and how to get pass the “gate-keepers”.
As an Executive Recruiter I was privy to working directly with Corporate Recruiters and understanding
their process in selecting which candidates to interview and hire. I will candidly answer your questions,
possibly bluntly answering your questions, but I will be totally honest. My objective is to help you achieve
your employment goal.
Now That We’re All Here
Earlier this month in the Bay Area, officials for the public transportation system
known as BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) made the decision to shut down cell phone
service at four of its downtown stations with the expressed purpose of disrupting a
planned protest. In July of this year, protesters disrupted service at several stations
during a demonstration.
When BART officials caught wind of another planned event the took the proactive
step of shutting down cell tower service in order to disrupt the efforts of the protestors.
Early reports indicated that BART cut off cell phone service by approaching carriers
directly and asking them to turn service off. The major cell service carriers have not
publicly stated whether or not they were involved in the action.
The most surprising aspect of this action is the unilateral decision on the part of a
non-governmental entity to shut down a portion of a public utility for purely private
reasons. During the the first days of what’s now widely known as the “Arab Spring”
, authoritarian regimes in the Middle East routinely cut communications in and out
of the country to keep foreign governments from interfering with internal affairs, or
more importantly, coming to the aid of the protestors.
Eventually international pressure from the world community persuaded government
officials to re-open service in their respective countries, and to their detriment,
protestors were able to co-ordinate more efficiently and eventually bring about real
change in their respective countries. BART’s decision to shut down cell service
is even more striking due to the fact that for a large number of people, their cell
phones are their primary mode of telecommunication and without service they are
functionally cut-off from the rest of the world. In January 2011, the UN’s International
Telecommunication Union reported that the number of cell phone subscriptions
topped 5 billion users. That’s a number almost equal to the number of people in the
world. Now, all five billion of those users weren’t affected by this particular action by
a certain number were.
Some of those affected were just non-involved actors just trying to get from point A
to point B, just like they had probably done for countless days and nights before the
day in question.
Maybe BART officials did do the right thing as far as public safety was concerned
and acted fully within their rights on their property. But what about the rights of
the people who weren’t a part of this planned action and were unjustly denied the
enjoyment of cell services they paid for and who were also denied the Freedom of
Speech protections because a private, well-monied business concern decided that
their issues and concerns overrode the rights of those affected? These things matter
because it doesn’t take 2 or 3 billion interrupted calls for someone’s Freedom of Speech
right to be violated; it only takes one.
I read an article recently that said that some employers are only considering employed candidates for their
positions. Is this against the law? Jonathan
Dear Jonathan:
If this is not a law it should be. This would seem to be a form of discrimination. I suspect these employers are
not actually advertising or publicly stating that they will only consider employed candidates for their open positions.
However, what employers do behind closed doors in regards to how they make their hiring decisions is, and will
always remain, confidential. Do not let some article like this keep you from seeking employment. Continue to
apply for positions that match your skills, experience and education. Submit an effective resume that addresses the
employer’s requirements and qualifications. Write a dynamic cover letter that focuses on your accomplishments and
states your interest in their company and the position. Do not let statements, newspaper articles or anyone keep you
from pursing a position you are interested in being considered as a candidate.
Is it OK to go around recruiters and directly contact the hiring manager. Would it be considered inappropriate
or healthy assertiveness? Audrey
Dear Audrey:
It would depend on if the recruiter is working for you or the employer. There are two type of recruiters, agency
and in-house. The agency recruiter is retained or commissioned by an employer to fill a position. The agency
recruiter recruits, screens and selects a candidate to present to the employer. This type of recruiter is working on your
behalf and the employer. Their goal is to recruit the ideal person who will eventually be hired by the employer. The
employer expects the recruiter to partner with them in their search for candidates. A hiring manager might consider
it inappropriate behavior for a candidate to go around the recruiter and directly contact them. This action might also
reflect badly on the recruiter and hurt a candidate’s chances at being hired.
If this is an in-house recruiter, who is employed by the company, I would advise you to also be cautious. You do
not want to offend anyone and possibly lose an employment opportunity. The right thing to do in either situation
is to ask the recruiter for permission to directly contact the hiring manager and state your reasons. If the in-house
recruiter or agency recruiter approves, then go for it. If they do not approve, you will have to trust and leave it in the
hands of the recruiter.
Everything you ever wanted to know about how to find a job…but did not know who to ask. ASK jai. Send
your questions to jai@resumeandcareerservices.com or visit website www.resumeandcareerservices.com.
KATIE Tse..........This and That
ASSEMBLY REQUIRED
Besides ex-pat Swedes, who go there for the meatballs and kipper
snacks, IKEA is for people going through some life transition. The
last time I visited the store was when I moved into my apartment. It
was a few years ago, so my memories are sketchy. I remember the
store being a multileveled warehouse with rooms instead of aisles,
and no clear signage indicating where you’re going. No doubt this
layout helps customers better visualize the furniture in context, but
I just think IKEA wants you to get lost and buy more stuff. I recall
scribbling item numbers, prices, and dimensions on a pad of paper as I went from
room to room, trying to remember if the “Malm” was a darker brown than the “Odda.”
Next, we (a willing victim such as my dad or then-boyfriend-now-husband) descended
into the bowels of the store to fetch the items from aisles of identical flat cardboard
boxes (see, aisles had to come in eventually). It was like the end of “Raiders of the Lost
Ark,” but crowded. And you better hope you copied down the item numbers correctly,
otherwise you might end up with an Odda instead of a Malm. Finally, we hauled the
boxes on a metal gurney to the car. At the apartment, the victim and I unpacked the
things and put them together at a later date, because you can only concentrate so much
in one day.
One of the beauties of IKEA, I never appreciated until now, is the simplicity of its
designs and directions. A picture is
preferable to a thousand words, and
I became keenly aware of this while
helping my friend assemble a Fisher-
Price bassinet. Our husbands were
at work, and in an attitude of “girl
power,” I assured her we’d finish the
thing before they got home. She
warned me it was a two-person job.
We started by holding metal poles
in place while stretching very taut
fabric over them, and then inserting
more poles into more tight fabric
tubing. I mused that this must be
what building a tent is like (you can
tell how often I go camping), and considered it might even be a three-person job.
Subsequent steps had us tightly maneuver the ruffled skirt over its frame and fasten it
all together with a series of tightly stretched pockets and snaps. The key word in all of
this is “tight,” if you haven’t noticed.
Feeling successful at having won the battle of pockets and snaps, we stood up to
admire our progress. “Alright, now we need to snap the first canopy arm onto the
frame aligning with the holes on the frame through the slot on the side of the skirt
with two slots,” she read. That sounded fine, except our slots didn’t match the slots in
the picture. We compared them every way we could, but each time, ours turned out
looking backwards. “Did we put the skirt on backwards?” “No, because it says the
‘Warning’ sign needs to be at the back like ours is.” “But then the slots don’t line up
with the holes.” “Okay, let’s take it off and put it on the other way.” So we undid all our
beautiful snap and pocket work and refastened everything “backwards.” “Well, now
the slots line up, but it doesn’t match the picture.” Again, we analyzed all the angles
and concluded this was the way it had to be, despite Fisher-Price’s guidance. “Now,”
she read, “we stretch the canopy across the skirt frame and secure the ends with snaps.”
“Ah ha!” I shouted, clutching the edges of the canopy. “There are no snaps, it’s all
Velcro! Now we know we can’t trust the instructions!” I felt vindicated. Although
technically backwards, we finished it before the guys got home.
My husband and I later helped them assemble some more furniture. But, being
IKEA, it was all comparable smooth sailing. I think my IKEA days are over for a while.
That is, unless I go back to try their meatballs. Hey, 10 pieces are only $2.99!
The Sensational, Silk-Spinning
Spider - Friend or Foe?
Happy Tails
by Chris Leclerc.
Canyon Canine Dog
Walking & Pet Sitting Services
Throughout history, certain species of animals, at various
levels on the food chain have fallen prey to a predator that
is very different from what one might expect. This private
predator is not located in the forests or in the deep depths
of the ocean, where most wildlife survival attacks take
place. This predator is rarely ever pointed out in public,
and rarely claims the blame or admits taking part in the
prey and attack process.
The predator I am referring to is the incredible human
being, and the attack is not only physical, but mental and
spiritual as well. The human’s tendency to spread negative
rumors and create long-term urban legends that cause
irreparable damage to the reputation of other species is
typically based on ignorance and fear, and the preferred
prey can vary tremendously from one species to another.
Unusual behavioral patterns or physical appearances of
creatures that are extremely different from ourselves are
often misunderstood, so rather than taking the time to
learn more about other creatures, and understand why
they look or act the way they do, we humans often put
them into a category that defines them as creepy and
extinguishable. I find it rather ironic that so many living
things on this earth that play a major role in the survival of
we humans, are those that we tend to fear the most.
Of the many creatures who have fallen prey to the
human’s presumptuous paranoia throughout history, the
spider is most likely among the top on the list. I think
that this is really quite unfortunate, because spiders play
such an important role in the balance of our ecosystem.
In fact, without spiders this world would be in big trouble,
both on a local community level as well as on a mega-
scale level, in the overall scheme of survival. Spiders are
among the approximately 100,000 species that fall into
the classification of Arachnids, mainly characterized by
the fact that they have four pairs of legs and a body that
is separated into two segments. There are about 2,000
different species of spiders in the United States, and
although, with the exception of one family, all spiders
do carry venom to subdue their prey, very few are likely
to cause concern to the human being. More often than
not, any cause of concern related to a spider bite is due
to an allergic reaction. Only two species of spiders found
in North America are known to be a serious threat to the
human. They are the black widow and the brown recluse.
When you line up the true facts, break it down and do
the math it becomes clear that the risks that spiders present
are minimal, and arachnophobia becomes nothing more
than another form of paranoia on the part of the human.
Now that we know the truth about the minimal risks
spiders present, let’s focus on the good things they do and
the hard work they perform on a daily basis to ensure the
health and welfare of our existence.
All spiders produce silk, with which they weave their
wonderful webs and this fascinates me beyond words.
Some webs can be so large they cross the street from
one tree or telephone pole to another. I saw a huge one
recently during a walk with my dog, and I wish I had had
my camera with me at the time, because it was absolutely
gorgeous - a really remarkable work of art! But, aesthetic
beauty is not necessarily the purpose of the silken spider’s
web.
As we all know, the main reason why the spectacular
spider weaves its sticky, silky web is to catch insects and
other small creatures to eat. This is the most important role
that the spider plays in nature, and it has a direct positive
impact on each and every one of us. If you annihilate
every spider in your house and in your yard, you will
most definitely find out (the hard way) just how valuable
those eight legged creatures are to you. Indeed, you will
probably find yourself calling the exterminator numerous
times thereafter, because your home would most likely
become infested with every type of tiny creature that you
can possibly imagine.
The truth is that the spider keeps our local bug
population in check in a way that no one else could,
including a human in a uniform with a can of killing
chemicals! So what would you rather have? A delicate,
illusive, shy eight-legged being who is more afraid of you
than you are of him, or an entourage of stinging, biting
or just plain annoying insects invading your living space,
both inside and out?
The answer comes easy for me. I prefer to keep my
interesting, artistic spider friends around where I can
benefit from their gorgeous works of silken art, and their
veracious appetite for certain blood-thirsty creatures who
would otherwise over-populate and potentially make my
life miserable. Isn’t is amazing how just a little information
can do so much good for the reputation of an historically
misunderstood, feared creature?
In tune with my typical “Happy Tails” theme, I encourage
all my human friends to educate themselves better about
all living things, particularly those that differ from us, and
learn to appreciate the value of their presence.
|