B4
OPINION
Mountain Views-News Saturday, July 19. 2014
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
SENIOR COMMUNITY
EDITOR
Pat Birdsall
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Merri Jill Finstrom
Lori Koop
Rev. James Snyder
Tina Paul
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Welborn
Renee Quenell
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Marc Garlett
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
GREG Welborn
HOWARD Hays As I See It
HERE WE GO, AGAIN!
“Are folks more
interested in politics or
are they more interested
in solving the problem?”
- President Barack
Obama, upon arrival
in Texas
I can’t imagine
condoning a loved one, a child, embarking
on a hellish 1,500 mile journey with
limited probability of survival. Nor can
I put myself in the shoes of that 17-year-
old girl I heard explaining through an
interpreter and through tears how she
made it from Honduras after her brother
was killed for refusing to join a gang, and
she herself was threatened with the same
unless she agreed to join up and become
their “property”.
(San Pedro Sula in Honduras has the
highest murder rate in the world at 193
per 100,000. In NYC it’s 5.1.)
It’s hard to pass judgment sitting home
in Sierra Madre. But I can ask myself,
as suggested by the president, if I’m one
who’s interested in the problem, or in
simply playing politics.
I gave that some thought, and figured,
“Well, yes and no.”
To understand the problem, we need
to be clear on what it’s not. In Greg
Welborn’s column last week, he suggests
it’s a matter of “border security”.
The current problem has nothing to
do with “border security” (other than by
having to divert personnel). Deportations
by ICE at the border have increased every
year since President Obama took office
– from 134,451 in FY 2008 to 235,093
in FY 2013. A decreasing percentage of
deportees have been children, with an
increasing percentage being those with
criminal records.
The thousands now making the trek
to the Rio Grande Valley from Central
America aren’t trying to sneak through,
but are readily turning themselves in to
authorities. These aren’t illegal border-
crossers, but refugees.
Greg blames us for “enticing the world’s
masses with the promise of ample benefits
upon arrival”, though there’s no evidence
of any such “promise” playing a role.
There’s the 2008 law passed unanimously
under Bush which guarantees a hearing
before any deportation to those under
18 from places other than Canada and
Mexico. The DREAM Act’s come up in
the debate, but that only affects those who
grew up here, were educated here and
who call here home.
For root causes you could go back
thirty years when under Reagan we
sunk $5 billion into supporting the
military and landowners in El Salvador
– fueling a conflict that cost 75,000 lives,
proportional to the number we lost in our
own Civil War.
We could look to the streets of L.A.,
where kids displaced by that war came
and established the Calle 18 and Mara
Salvatrucha gangs. Later deported back
to their home countries, they picked up
where they left off – in a country awash
with weapons bought with our $5 billion.
Five years ago under President Obama,
we stood aside as the democratically
elected government of Honduras was
overthrown by a military coup. The
oligarchs felt threatened by advocates
for higher wages and increased access to
education – and by a people given hope.
Honduras was the original “banana
republic”; now, it’s the most lethal one.
This problem has roots in events under
Reagan, Bush and Obama. But for the
politics, it’s got to be all Obama’s fault.
Greg complains the administration’s
$3.7 billion proposal would “allocate
not one thin dime to additional border
security”. What the president has chosen
to do instead is address the problem, not
the politics.
That $3.7 billion includes:
$1.8 billion to HHS for care of children
and refugees
$1.5 billion to the Dept. of Homeland
Security for “detention and removal”
of adults, extra pay for ICE and Border
Patrol agents, the Border Enforcement
Security Task Force, air surveillance and
targeting immigrant smugglers
$300 million to the State Dept for
“repatriation, strengthening foreign
borders, addressing root causes of
migration” and media campaigns in
Mexico and Central America
$64 million to the Justice Dept for
additional immigration judges and legal
assistance
Some Republicans suggest cutting funds
for the children and spending instead on
National Guard troops (who couldn’t stop
or arrest anyone, anyway).
Others won’t support anything, seeing
this as not a problem for the nation but
for President Obama, “who owns this
problem and created this problem”,
according to Rep. Randy Weber (R-TX).
Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) suggests the
cost “be offset from Obamacare.”
(In the meantime, the House just passed
the “bonus depreciation” corporate tax
break, adding $287 billion to our deficit
over the next ten years.)
Greg assures that Conservatives “stand
ready to negotiate a comprehensive
solution”, but can’t find “reliable
negotiating partners.”
The president last December endorsed
$46.3 billion over ten years for border
security, adding 20,000 Border Patrol
agents with “24-hour surveillance” of
border areas and 225 more judges to
help with the backlog. This was part of
the comprehensive immigration reform
bill produced by “reliable negotiating
partners” from both parties, which passed
the Senate with bipartisan support.
It also appears to have majority support
in the House. Rep. Donna Edwards
(D-MD), however, said last week it’s
stalled because of opposition from
eighteen Republicans, and Speaker John
Boehner (R-OH) won’t let it come to the
floor for a vote. You can’t risk having
an accomplishment Democrats might
campaign on in the mid-terms.
The 17-year-old mentioned above,
through the translator and through tears,
told how “kids are dying along the way;
they drown, they’re murdered” and “The
only thing I would beg is, please give me
a chance to stay here, so I can fulfill my
dreams, so I can take care of my family.”
In a Times story, 800 volunteers in
McAllen, Texas have served some 3,000
immigrants at their “hastily organized”
immigrant relief center. Food donations
have overflowed “in a region where
many residents live in shacks and trailers
without electricity”.
Then there were the several dozen in
Murrieta banging on buses carrying
women and children, shouting “Send
them back!”, spitting at counter-protesters
and forcing the buses back to San Ysidro.
This doesn’t solve any problems. It isn’t
politics, either. It’s just shameful.
The world stands on the brink of yet another war between Israel
and the Palestinians. The accepted wisdom is that the Jews have
once again pricked their neighbors and ignited the powder keg.
But, is it really just a matter of the Jews behaving themselves and
dealing fairly with their neighbors? If only the Jews would give
up some land – see the legitimacy in the Palestinian cause. The
problem with this scenario is that it assumes the Palestinian
cause is simply to obtain a homeland for themselves and to then live peacefully with
their neighbors. Were that the true Palestinian cause, we would have had peace long
ago.
It is beyond ironic that the accepted wisdom retains credibility at a time when
Israel’s coalition government has openly accepted the recognition of a Palestinian
state. Israeli opinion has moved over the years to the point where there is a strong
national consensus for a two-state solution. In fact, Benjamin Netanyahu became
the first prime minister to agree to a settlement freeze.
Netanyahu froze settlements for 10 months, inviting Mahmoud Abbas, Chairman
of the PLO, to negotiate the border lines, terms and conditions. Abbas boycotted
the talks for 9 of those months, showed up in the 10th, and then walked out when
the freeze expired. That’s not good faith, but it is consistent with the long history of
Palestinian actions.
In 2000 at the Camp David meetings, Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak,
offered Yasser Arafat a Palestinian state including the unthinkable – the division
of Jerusalem. Arafat refused without any counter offer, returned home and then
launched a terror campaign which cost 1,000+ Israeli lives.
In 2001, the Clinton administration negotiated an even better deal for Palestinians.
Both sides needed to swallow hard and release long-held demands. The Jews did;
Arafat did not. Again, the Palestinians walked away from their “cause”.
In 2005, Israel was actually convinced to give up Gaza. They withdrew all forces,
dismantled 21 settlements and forcibly evicted 9,000 of their own citizenry from
those settlements. This was then followed by a 2008 Israeli offer to give up 100%
of the West Bank, acknowledge Palestinian statehood, and again divide Jerusalem.
The Palestinian response? A steady increase in Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel.
An honest observer can see that the Palestinians have repeatedly been offered
success for their “cause”: land, statehood, and an equal claim to Jerusalem. Each
time, they have rejected the solution because each time the solution didn’t address
their true cause. Each offer contained in it a requirement that the Palestinians accept
Israel’s right to exist. Each offer was meant to be a final peace, but the Palestinians
have no interest in a final peace; they have no interest in allowing a Jewish state to
exist.
Land for peace was the basis for peace with Egypt; it was the basis for peace in
Jordon. In both cases, Arab leadership had a real interest in peace, accepted fair
deals and, at least to date, has honored the agreements. Not so with the Palestinians.
Palestinians are animated by a hatred which knows few boundaries, and that hatred
is nurtured by both Hamas and PLO leadership which are united in a visceral hatred
of Israel and will take any excuse to translate that hatred from ugly words (“pigs”,
“apes”, “rabid dogs”, “non-humans”) into real sticks and stones (literally thousands
of rockets).
This time around Hamas jumped on the murder of a Palestinian teenager.
The murder of any person, especially a child, is a gruesome act and warrants an
appropriate response. But waging a war is not an appropriate response by any
stretch of domestic or international law, or even of a properly tethered imagination.
First of all, the Palestinian’s murder was in response to the Palestinian murder of
3 Jewish youths. That is NOT justification, only context. If murder is a legitimate
cause for war, then Israel is 3-times more justified in warring against Palestinians.
More telling, the different public responses to these murders reside on unequal moral
planes. Israeli citizens, Jewish authorities and leading Rabbis have all condemned the
murder of the Palestinian – several of the Rabbis calling for the death sentence. The
response among Palestinians to the kidnapping and murder of the 3 Jewish youths
was celebration. The mother of one of the Palestinian suspects commented that “if
he did the kidnapping, I’ll be proud of him”, while the mother of another Palestinian
terrorist celebrated the “martyrdom operation” which cost her son his life.
What kind of people celebrate the purposeful murder of innocents? What type
of people celebrate the death of their own child, who was trying to kill and maim
hundreds, if not thousands, in his “martyrdom operation”? The answer is, not
people who truly want peace or with whom you can negotiate peace in good faith.
So what’s left for Israel to do? Sadly, if Israel wants a fair, lasting, “final” peace, it’s
going to have to attack the root cause of war. That is not Jewish settlements or any
amount or location of land. Israel will have to destroy Hamas as a viable political
entity and as a military power even in the face of the inevitable calls for restraint or
proportionate response. This does not mean the purposeful targeting of citizens –
even the accidental killing of whom Israel takes great pain to avoid. Even now, Israel
is warning citizens of Hamas to leave the area. This is what a great moral power
does. Putting military targets next to school yards, hospitals and residential areas –
as Hamas routinely does – is what a cowardly and evil power does.
The world will be better off if the Jews will wage this war until Hamas is destroyed.
Secondarily to that, the region will achieve long-term peace when Arabs of all
political and religious affiliations come to recognize Israel’s right to exist. When
that happens, peace will happen.
About the author: Gregory J. Welborn is a freelance writer and has spoken to several
civic and religious organizations on cultural and moral issues. He lives in the Los
Angeles area with his wife and 3 children and is active in the community. He can be
reached gregwelborn2@gmail.com
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
OUT TO PASTOR A Weekly Religion Column by Rev. James Snyder
”LET IT GO, LET GO, LET IT GO”
This year I celebrate my 20th year as a practicing grandfather.
I am not sure that after 20 years I know anything more about
being a grandfather than I did before. I have not found any
books written on how to be a grandfather, maybe I should write
one. I have enjoyed those 20 years and it just seems to be getting better.
One of the interesting things about a grandfather is spending time with the
grandchildren, especially when they are trying to watch a movie.
I enjoy a movie every now and again, but when it comes to little girls, they do not
seem to have the same taste in movies as their grandfather. This is something I will
never understand. What is a grandfather to do? The only way to get them to sit still
and be quiet is to show one of their movies.
One of the movies so important to little girls these days is the movie called
Frozen. As it happened, we had to have a special night set aside to watch this movie
with the granddaughters. I figured, how hard could it really be?
I consented on this movie because I thought this would give those tired,
overworked little gray cells upstairs a chance to relax and not work so hard. After
all, how can you think when you are watching something like a movie for children?
I also thought it would be nice to rest my body as well as my eyes, if I can get
away with it. After all, who wants to follow the plot, if there is any such thing, in a
children’s movie.
We had settled down to watch this exciting little girl’s movie, I was half dozing
and then I began to think about the manuscript I was working on. I had been
having trouble with a certain aspect of that manuscript and as I sat there, I begin
to think about how I could fix that problem. It almost came to me, but then I
heard, ”Grandpa, grandpa, grandpa look at that, look at that!”
The cheering granddaughters brought me back to the land of the living and the
reality as they were watching it. Both of them at the same time begin to explain
to me what it happened and what was going to happen. Between the two little
chatterboxes, I had no idea what they were talking about. What is a grandfather
to do but smile broadly and pretend you are listening. After all, they are only little
once.
They soon quieted down and were fixated on the screen watching
the movie unfold. I sighed a deep sigh of relief and went back into
my previous stupor. I try to follow the movie, but then I remembered
that in the afternoon I had to write a column for my newspapers.
As of yet, I did not have an idea what that column would be. I like
to start with the title and then following that develop a story line.
As yet, I did not have an acceptable column title. As I mused about
this, thoughts were beginning to gel and that little light bulb began to
flicker. Thoughts were beginning to come into place, and then I heard
some loud screaming and clapping and two little girls were jumping up and down
singing, ”Let it go, let it go, let it go.”
I sat up in my chair, looking around trying to figure out what in the world they
were trying to let go. It is at this point that grandmothers are no help to grandfathers.
Grandmothers can say, ”You girls watch the movie with grandpa while I make
supper.”
Personally, I do not think it is fair. I would like to make supper one night while
grandma joins the little girls watching a movie. The problem is, nobody would eat
the supper that I would prepare, not even Yours Truly.
What these little girls were all excited about was something I was trying to figure
out. It did not make any sense to me, but as I watched the little grandchildren,
they were excited, laughing, shouting and singing. Of course, it is hard to tell the
difference between shouting and singing, especially in today’s musical world. They
were absolutely enjoying themselves and I tried to focus in on the source of their
enjoyment.
”Grandpa,” both of them yelled at me in absolute delight, ”sing the song with us.”
What grandpa’s go through while entertaining their grandchildren.
I made a deal with them at that time, ”I will sing with you, but I certainly will
not dance with you.” A grandfather has to draw the line somewhere. And so,
I joined in singing, ”Let it go, let it go, let it go.” I got those words down pretty
good, but the rest of the song was a mysterious blank to me. They were excited
about singing it and soon I was excited about watching them sing it.
That evening when the little ones were snuggled into bed, I remember what
David said. ”For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life: weeping
may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning” (Psalms 30:5).
In the Hebrew, so they tell me, the word ”joy,” also means singing. My faith in
Jesus Christ has brought me to a wonderful place where I can sing, ”Let it go, let it
go, let it go.”
Rev. James L. Snyder is pastor of the Family of God Fellowship, PO Box 831313,
Ocala, FL 34483. He lives with his wife, Martha, in Silver Springs Shores. E-mail
jamessnyder2@att.net or website www.jamessnyderministries.com.
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
We’d like to hear from you!
What’s on YOUR Mind?
Contact us at: editor@mtnviewsnews.com or www.
facebook.com/mountainviewsnews AND Twitter: #mtnviewsnews
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|