B4
OPINION
Mountain Views-News Saturday, September 13, 2014
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
PRODUCTION
Richard Garcia
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
CoCo Lasalle
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Dr. Tina Paul
Rich Johnson
Merri Jill Finstrom
Lori Koop
Rev. James Snyder
Tina Paul
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Welborn
Renee Quenell
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Marc Garlett
RICH Johnson
BUFFET AND MY OTHER
FAVORITE WORDS
CLEANING UP MESSES,
PARSONAGE STYLE
By Dr. James L. Snyder
Throughout the glorious years of our marriage, the Gracious Mistress of the
Parsonage and Yours Truly has had few disagreements. I suppose I could count
them all on my one hand, but I am not sure if it is my right hand or my left hand
so I will just leave it at that.
I hear, of course, of many couples who do nothing but bicker and fight from
morning till night. I have always wondered what the purpose of all that was and
what it ever accomplished. I think there is a better way to live together.
There are several phrases I have memorized and used throughout the years of our marriage that has
kept me in good standing.
�Yes, dear.� �You�re right, dear.� �I�ll do it right away, dear.�
I have found that if I include the word �dear,� with all of my responses it fares better for me.
Of course, I am the kind of person that does not have to be right all the time, which makes me the
perfect husband. Admitting you are wrong, even if you do not think you are, is really not the end of the
world. In fact, it may be the beginning of a bright new world.
I said �few disagreements,� and I need to explain what I meant by that.
The major disagreements that my wife and I have had throughout the years can be boiled down into one
phrase, �It�s a mess.� Usually, actually all the time this phrase is being used, it is coming from the lips of my
wife.
Our disagreement is in the definition of �mess.� She has one definition and I have another definition,
and the twain shall never meet. Mark my words on that.
If you would come into our home, you will discover that every room in the house is well organized and
very neat. Well, not every room. The one room that does not come up to that criterion is the room in which
I occupy. It is my space. My well-organized wife will walk by my room, pause, look in and say, �It�s a mess.�
It took me a long time to realize what she was talking about. Eventually, I got to the point where I
understood that what she was referring to was �my space.� Unfortunately, we did not share the same vision
of my space. I am of the mindset that if I am working I need to have organized messes all around me.
I have tried explaining to my wife that I am a messologist. I had to explain to her that a messologist is
someone who specializes in organizing intentional messes. I am not sure I have convinced her yet of this.
I really think that one person�s mess is another person�s workspace. I cannot really work efficiently
unless there are intentional messes around me, protecting me, giving me the incentive I need to pursue
the job at hand. My basic philosophy is simply this, if I cannot find what I need when I need it, I probably
do not really need it. It has worked for me most marvelously.
The real trick of a messologist is knowing where to find what you need when you need it.
My wife can walk into my space and look around and be utterly confused by what she calls �a mess.�
Of course, it looks like a mess to her. It is not her mess! If it was her mess she would understand it and be
comforted by it.
My wife is of the idea that organization has to do with numerical or alphabetical order. Now that works
for some people, I suppose. But, as I keep telling her, that is not the only circus in town! I cannot tell how
many times something new has developed in my thinking while I was searching for something I could not
really find. That is the genius of a messologist.
Some people, like my wife, like to go from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4; or, A to B to C to D all the way to Z. To a normal
person, and I am guessing my wife is normal, that makes a lot of sense. But to a messologist, that kind of
thinking is rather confusing.
What I want to know is, what do you do when you come to the end of the alphabet? Where do you go
from there? Then, it is rather important that you have the alphabet in alphabetical order. If I would ever try
to do that I would end up being so confused, they would have to admit me in some rehab facility to clean
my mind out.
So, the thing that makes our marriage so blissful is that we have an agreement and that she does things
her way and I do things my way. This has been the recipe for blissfulness in our marriage. I do not make
her do it my way and she cannot make me do it her way. We both have brains, but they tick after a different
tock.
I then thought of a verse of Scripture that rather fit my situation. �There is a way which
seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death� (Proverbs 14:12).
My way has to be in complete harmony with His way or my life will be completely destroyed.
Rev. James L. Snyder is pastor of the Family of God Fellowship, PO Box 831313, Ocala,
FL 34483. He lives with his wife, Martha, in Silver Springs Shores. Call him at 1-866-
552-2543 or e-mail jamessnyder2@att.net or website www.jamessnyderministries.com.
Anyone know what my favorite word �buffet� means?
Believe it or not the French definition is different than the
British definition.
The French word means �to strike with the hands or the
fist�. That�s certainly not my favorite use of the word. The
British word means �a meal at which guests help themselves
from a number of dishes and often eat standing up�.
I like the British definition better. I�ve rarely eaten at a
buffet standing up (maybe in transit when I couldn�t wait to get back to the table).
I wonder if, when you eat standing up, your shoe size will expand rather than
your waist. Gonna have to try that.
Currently there are two great buffets in Sierra Madre. The Peppertree Grill is
back to being open on Monday Night offering an all-you-can-eat buffet to keep
you occupied while you watch the Monday Night Football game (They are at 322
W. Sierra Madre Blvd). I think it starts at 5:00 on Monday nights. And Tuesday
and Wednesday noon time Corfu has a buffet (They are at 48 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd).
What�s your favorite word? I read somewhere (so it must be true) that our
favorite word is our name. When I asked my friend, Barney, he just laughed at
me. I guess there are some exceptions to that rule.
Along with buffet, I would have to consider my kids names as my favorite word:
Olivia and Alex. But which child? Probably Olivia more than Alex cause she�s the
good child. It would probably rotate. High up on my list of favorite words you
would also find Beatles and guitar.
Can acronyms count as favorite words? Acronym is a set of initials representing
a name or organization. If acronyms are acceptable I know my friend Carolyn�s
favorite word: NASCAR!! If they aren�t acceptable I�ll bet Carolyn�s favorite word
would be �Disneyland�.
I think it�s a pretty safe bet acronyms are peoples least favorite words. Like take
IRS for example. Or DMV, or DOA. Are you someone who thinks the whole
new genre of texting acronyms like LOL, are horrible and portents of the fall of
Western Civilization?
In my considerable library of useless trivia and quotes, lives a book entitled
�The Superior Person�s Book of Words�, penned by Peter Bowler. It houses 500
word missiles we can use to establish our superiority. Here are a couple:
Acerebral: Without a brain. Usage of this word could be aimed at species on this
planet that use both two and four legs to get around.
Afflatus: A sudden rush of divine or poetic inspiration. I get this a lot.
Alopecia: Unfortunately this word also describes me. It�s meaning? Baldnes. My
alopecia really shines on a sunny day.
Bastinado: Beating the soles of one�s feet. Some people would prefer that to the
ear bashing one receives at one of our JJ Jukebox golden oldies concerts. (By the
way, JJ Jukebox is performing Saturday, November 8, 2014 at the Peppertree Grill.
6:30 to 8:30. 322 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Make reservations at (626) 355-8444.)
Be sure to try the Peppertree Grill�s Monday Night Football Buffet. It�s on
Monday nights I think (I think I�m going acerebral).
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
HOWARD Hays As I See It
GREG Welborn
THE PRESIDENT�S WAR PLAN
�I�m not going to apologize for trying to do something while they�re
doing nothing.�
- President Obama, responding to House Speaker John Boehner�s
threatened lawsuit last June
I was glad to see Greg Welborn back with his column last week.
Reading through it, I was almost surprised he didn�t somehow attribute
the Ebola outbreak in West Africa to the president�s �incompetence�.
I know � the world�s a mess. I also know how impatient some are to
have us once again invade and occupy a Muslim country, or reignite
a Cold War with a nuclear power. Dan Rather had a good response to
such eagerness; �I will hear you out if you�re prepared to send your son, your daughter,
your grandson, your granddaughter to that war for which you�re beating the drums. If
you aren�t, don�t even talk to me.�
This is being written in advance of President Obama�s address to the nation Wednesday
night. I�m sure he�ll make a priority of building coalitions with allies and regional players.
A German diplomat interviewed on NPR, asked to compare coordinating with the
Obama Administration on Ukraine with coordinating with Bush on Iraq, had a quick
response: �At least we�re talking with the Obama Administration.�
Another ongoing priority is to make clear that for our help to do any good, nations
have to get their own acts together - we can�t do it all for them. After months of pressure,
there�s finally a new Prime Minister in Iraq with whom we can coordinate to help defeat
the Islamic State in that country. He replaces the previous CIA-approved holdover from
the Bush years, who�d become one of ISIS� biggest recruiting tools.
In Afghanistan, as we�re trying to get our troops out by the end of the year, we�re dealing
with two presidential candidates who both continue insisting on claiming victory some
three months after the June run-offs, and despite a subsequent U.N.-monitored re-count.
In Libya, there�s fortunately only one government in its capital, Tripoli. The problem is,
there�s another in Tobruk claiming it�s the real deal. There�s Qatar, host to one of our
largest air bases in the region and also one of the largest sources of funding for Islamic
terrorism.
It�s complicated, and it�s reassuring to have a president who thinks things through
before �trying to do something�. For Congressional Republicans, though, it�s simple
� responding the same as to immigration reform or most any other issue: knock the
president for not taking action on his own, avoid having to cast a vote on the record by
�doing nothing� as a legislative body, and then threaten to sue (or impeach) the president
for taking too many actions on his own (as House Speaker Boehner did last June). Aside
from that, it�s hoping things go south to provide a better campaign issue against President
Obama and the Dems.
Now that Congress is back from vacation, planning for maybe two weeks in session
before the November elections, it looks like they�ll manage to run out the clock �doing
nothing�. If anything, the focus might be on Congressional tea-baggers toying with
another government shutdown, with �establishment� Republicans concerned about re-
election wishing they�d shut up.
It�s hard to predict how evolving world crises will play out in the campaigns.
Republicans have got to be hoping things only get worse, as they�re running out of
issues to campaign on. There�s the Affordable Care Act, for example. Sen. Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell remains opposed to �Obamacare�, but now tries to suggest it�s
somehow �unconnected� to the popular Kentucky exchange, which has enrolled nearly
a million in the state. Republican governors in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Indiana
and Wyoming have abandoned their initial opposition and are now moving to implement
the ACA�s expansion of Medicaid in their states. Enrollment nation-wide has exceeded
targets. Premium costs, which Republicans warned would skyrocket, are projected to
undergo a �modest� increase at most, or to actually go down � as has per-person costs for
Medicare.
It�ll be hard for them to hit Democrats on the economy. Last week, Forbes came out
with an analysis by Bob Deitrick, CEO of Polaris Financial Partners, who offered
this assessment of the Obama presidency: �This is the best private sector job creation
performance in American history.� The Purchasing Managers Index of the Institute for
Supply Management shows 63 straight months of economic expansion, with 25 straight
months of manufacturing growth.
As for Wall Street, Deitrick points out that at this point in the Reagan presidency, a
dollar invested when he took office �would have yielded a staggering 190% return. Such
returns were unheard of prior to his leadership.� Under Obama, the return would be
220%. �This level of investor growth is unprecedented by any administration.�
Continuing the comparison, �the current administration has reduced the deficit,
which skyrocketed under Reagan. Additionally, Obama has reduced federal employment,
which grew under Reagan . . . and truly delivered a �smaller government�.� Forbes
concludes, �President Obama�s administration has outperformed President Reagan�s in
all commonly watched categories.�
The policies which brought this �unprecedented� economic recovery were, of course,
universally opposed by the Republicans.
With issues like the economy and the Affordable Care Act effectively taken off the table
as viable campaign fodder, the most Republicans can hope for heading towards November
is intensifying world crises and a bungled response from a Democratic administration.
Here�s a theory: The surest way to achieve that would be to goad the president into repeating
the same disastrous mistakes made under the Bush Administration; which is maybe, just
maybe, why so many Republicans are urging him to rush in and �do something� without
taking the time to think it through.
Most voters, though, appreciate a leader who�s thoughtful and deliberate while actually
�trying to do something�, and aren�t going to be conned by those �doing nothing� other
than complaining about those who are.
As we mark the 13th anniversary of 9-11, it will be interesting to see
if this week�s and last week�s articles stand as philosophical book-
ends to the Obama presidency. I was very critical of President
Obama�s unwillingness to seriously engage the world as it really
is and to therefore confront the evil which walks so much of the
world unconcerned about what the greatest nation will do. If it
turns out I wrote prematurely and that the President does have a
coherent war plan, then I will be more than happy to commend
him for that action. For now, I will simply say that he deserves hearty and unreserved
public support if he is truly willing to fight this war.
A willingness on the President�s part to do just that would be in and of itself a major
accomplishment. It would mean he has undergone a sea-change and is now willing
to acknowledge that we are in a �war� (not a skirmish, struggle, police action or even
a conflict) and willing to acknowledge that he is a wartime leader. For someone who
has gained so much political mileage from opposing past wars and has based so many
of his presidential decisions on extracting the U.S. from physical military participation
in, or even leadership of, the world war which rages around us, this change is no doubt
difficult, but nonetheless desperately needed.
But this change from naivety to reality, and hopefully from failure to success, will
require other changes in how this president conducts his administration and chooses
to lead the nation. These will not go well with his closest advisors � made up almost
entirely now of sycophants � or closest supports � made up largely of the hard left who
may not be able to make this same transition.
Starting with the obvious, the war campaign he needs to launch will have to focus on
the goal of destroying ISIS, not just degrading it, and certainly not on trying to manage
it. Each of these verbs has been used by the President in recent speeches, and each
represents dramatically different goals, strategies and tactics. His words last night were
the right ones. I pray they were not just words to smooth the American public while he
implements more benign and disengaged actions to satisfy he core base.
A successful transition also means accepting the wisdom and prescriptions of an
earlier president from whom Obama has so assiduously distanced himself. President
Bush told us that boots on the ground would be needed for the long-term unless we
wanted to �surrender the future of Iraq to Al Qaeda�, �risk mass killings on a horrific
scale�, �allow terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq�, and to �confront an enemy
even more dangerous�. President Bush is owed an apology for the mockery his words
received, but at the very least, President Obama will take to heart the senior president�s
advice and stop trying to distance himself from someone whose policy prescriptions he
is increasingly having to continue or reinstitute. In short, President Obama will have to
commit significant boots on the ground. There will have to be an American presence
over there.
President Obama also needs to quit eviscerating the U.S. military. He will go before
Congress at some point to ask for funds to finance this new campaign, but those will be
the tip of the iceberg. We can no longer draw down the standing forces we have, starve
the services of needed technological developments or accept the current diminished size
of our naval fleet. As he wages war on ISIS, it�s time to stop waging war against our own
military.
His pattern of giving a speech and then moving on to another topic must stop.
This topic needs President Obama�s full attention and effort, and will likely need such
sustained focus for the remaining 28 months of his presidency. If September 10th�s
address becomes just another speech, just another idle warning, there will be hell to pay
on the shores of these United States. If that�s the type of commitment we just witnessed,
we�re going to witness some mass killings of Americans very soon.
Domestically, President Obama needs to unify the political leaders currently serving
at the behest of their constituencies. Republicans can no longer be referred to as the
enemy, ridiculed for having evil motives and dismissed as having no good input or
place at the table. Elections do matter, as this president is so fond of saying, and every
one of our representatives is there as a result of an election. Acknowledging that and
negotiating accordingly is a requirement if any military campaign is to work.
President Obama also needs to restore domestic trust in his leadership. Much has
been written about how our nation�s enemies do not fear him and our friends do not
trust him; a similar sentiment exists domestically because of the President�s habit of lying
to the nation about known facts and his habit of threatening to simply use that magic
pen and phone of his to dictate extra-constitutional executive orders. Elected officials
and the public at large do not trust this man as much as a wartime president needs to
be trusted. President Obama has a few short weeks (maybe even days) to correct that
problem with honest, inclusive and truly transparent communications and processes.
In summary, we need to be willing to rally around this president. The stakes are too
high to not give him a full measure of the support that is needed for what lies ahead. But
that is not a one-sided requirement; it is not without its quid pro quo. President Obama
seems to have made a crucial and healthy transition, but there are other important
actions and changes which are needed if we are to be successful and safe.
About the author: Gregory J. Welborn is a freelance writer and has spoken to several
civic and religious organizations on cultural and moral issues. He lives in the Los Angeles
area with his wife and 3 children and is active in the community. He can be reached
gregwelborn2@gma/5l.com
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper�s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|