15
OPINION
Mountain Views-News Saturday, February 14, 2015
RICH Johnson
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
PRODUCTION
Richard Garcia
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
CoCo Lasalle
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Dr. Tina Paul
Rich Johnson
Merri Jill Finstrom
Lori Koop
Rev. James Snyder
Tina Paul
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Welborn
Renee Quenell
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Marc Garlett
OUT TO PASTOR
A Weekly Religion Column by Rev. James Snyder
COINS OF THE REALM
What’s in your wallet? Probably not a lot of coins. Interesting
to note that the first general circulation of paper money by the
federal government didn’t happen until 1861. They became
known as “greenbacks” because of their color. I guess the
color stuck. Paper money sure came in handy. Imagine having
only coins when you pulled into the Sears parking lot to buy a
refrigerator. Now that I think of it I wonder if paper money is
legal? Under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, Section 8 it says: “…Congress shall
have the power to coin money…” It says nothing about printing paper money. I’ll
have to look into that. Another conspiracy with which to deal.
The earliest coins in the world were probably from the 11th Century BC in
China. The earliest coins in western history were from Greece around 700 BC.
The Romans got into coinage early on as well probably beginning around 300 BC.
At first those of us in the west used hammers and anvils to bang out coins, while
the Chinese cast their coins. By the way, the study of currency and coins is called
numismatics. Remember that for the test.
Anyway, back to the future. There are four primary mints in the country. Can
you name them? Philadelphia is numero uno. Then the Denver Mint, San Francisco
and the West Point Mint, named so as it is close some American landmark whose
name escapes me. Coins have a letter, a mint mark on them identifying them with
where they were issued. Can you guess what letter coins made in Philadelphia
bear? If you said “P” you are right. “D” was for Denver, “S” was for San Francisco,
and “W” was for West Point. As Carl Sagan might have said, “Billions and billions
of coins are produced every year at these mints”.
What I found particularly interesting was a list of obsolete US coins. Did you
know we offered the following at various times in our history?
Half cent (up to 1857)
Steel cent (1943 cause copper was used up in the war)
Two-cent and three-cent piece (up to 1873)
Half dime (up to 1873)
Twenty cent piece (up to 1878)\
Gold dollar (up to 1889)
Quarter eagle ($2.50) (up to 1929)
Three-dollar piece (up to 1889)
Half eagle ($5.00)
Eagle ($10.00)
Double eagle ($20.00) (up to the 1930s) (2009)
Half-union ($50.00) (1877 and 1915)
Well, now that we are so much more educated on money, I’m going to go out and
see if I can find some. Have a good week!
A BOX OF VALENTINE CHOCOLATES
NEVER MISSES ITS TARGET
I spent a few very profitable hours searching for a special box of Valentine
chocolates. After all, that special person in my life deserves all the time I can
spare in choosing the right box of chocolate.
I’m not sure who came up with the idea of giving your “Sweetheart” a box of chocolates on Valentine’s
Day, but I would like to shake his hand sometime. Of all the gizmos, doodads and gimmicks in the wide
world, this one tops them all.
It took me a long time to uncover this mystery of romance. As a young husband, I thought chocolate
was simply a piece of candy. Never in my wildest dreams did I ever imagine that one piece of chocolate
could solve so many problems in life.
I do not claim to understand it myself. I do not need to know how, in order to use it to my advantage.
Therefore, when it comes to a box of Valentine chocolates I do not need to know why it works or how it
works, only that it works.
Buying a box of chocolate on Valentine’s Day can cover a multitude of sins and trespasses committed
during the past year. Thus, my investment in a box of chocolate once a year pays rich and creamy
dividends. It is a small price to pay for a year’s worth of faux pas, mistakes and rolled up socks under
the bed.
That infamous day when I met, what later became the Gracious Mistress of the Parsonage, at a church
altar reciting those words “I do,” was the beginning of my life. Whoever thought that two words, just
three letters, could make such an impact upon a person’s life?
Of course, at the time I was too naïve and inexperienced in women-lore to understand that attached
to those two little words, “I do,” came the dreaded “honey-do-list.” Only a bride, coached by her mother,
understands the import of the whole scenario.
Like every husband to be before me, I stood at the altar looking goofy, wearing an insufferable smile
thinking all was well with the world. Little did I know that when I said, “I do,” it was done. I have
learned all the phases; do, did, done. And when I said, “I do,” I was done.
I must admit that the first years were quite a learning experience, especially for me. I do not think
being a husband is natural. It is something you have learned all by yourself. And, it is nothing that
fathers and sons talk about. Father passes on to their sons an appreciation for sports, knowing what
team to root for and an appreciation for good hard work and doing your best.
The only thing a father can pass on to his son concerning understanding women is this little bit of
wisdom; “Son, nobody has ever figured out women.” This may be why God created Adam before he
created Eve.
In the first few years of our marriage, I made a dreadfully wrong assumption. I assumed that being
married to me was enough. After all, at the wedding altar we took each other for “better or worse.” She
fulfilled the “better,” and I, of course, brought up the “worse.” In a marriage, everybody has his or her
responsibility and that was mine.
But in that first year of marriage I did something wrong. I cannot remember what it was now; I
probably did not know what it was then. That is the way it is with men. They have no idea what is going
on around them. But something I did, or maybe it was something I did not do, had created a little bit of
tension.
It was close to Valentine’s Day and I happened to be shopping at the supermarket when I spied a very
large red heart shaped box of chocolates. Normally, I would not have given it a second thought because
it was quite expensive. It certainly was beyond our modest budget at the time. However, something
came over me that I could not quite explain. In a flash of impulse, I put the box of chocolate in my
basket, and purchased it.
It was not quite Valentine’s Day so I hid it and waited for the day to approach.
Finally, the anticipated moment had come and I presented my wife with the biggest box of chocolate
she had ever seen up to that time. I do not know what happened, even to this day, but that box of
chocolate canceled out everything I had done wrong up to that point.
In fact, she still has that Valentine box that she uses to hold her jewelry. It is a constant reminder to
me that chocolate has a magical quality to it when it comes to women.
I have no idea how chocolate solves problems; I just know that it works. Possibly, one bite of that
chocolate immediately goes to the brain erasing forever, whatever her husband did the preceding
twelve months. No husband knows how it works, but why fool around with something that does work?
This is precisely the way forgiveness works. I do not know how it works I just know it works.
“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness.” (1 John 1:9).
God’s forgiveness never misses its mark, either.
Rev. James L. Snyder is pastor of the Family of God Fellowship, PO Box 831313, Ocala, FL 34483. He
lives with his wife, Martha, in Silver Springs Shores. Call him at 1-866-552-2543 or e-mail jamessnyder2@
att.net or website www.jamessnyderministries.com.
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN
HOWARD Hays As I See It
GREG Welborn
“It is evil things that we will be fighting against - brute force, bad faith,
injustice, oppression and persecution—and against them I am certain that
the right will prevail.”
British P.M. Neville Chamberlain, September 1939
It’s not the most pressing issue, but since Greg Welborn occasionally
brings up the name, as he did again in his column last week, it’s time for
somebody to stick up for Neville Chamberlain. He’s been getting a bum
rap.
His name’s become synonymous with “appeasement”, and the “peace for our time”
pronouncement made following his meeting with Hitler, ceding half of Czechoslovakia, at
Munich in 1938. A recent biography by British historian David Dutton, however, provides some
useful context.
Britain was in no shape to go to war with Germany over Czechoslovakia (or anything else, for
that matter) in September 1938. Its army had maybe two divisions, neither prepared for war on
the continent. The rearming of its navy and air force following WWI had barely begun, while
Hitler had been doubling and re-doubling the size of his Luftwaffe.
Prime Minister Chamberlain’s military advisors warned they weren’t ready to go up against
Hitler right then – but they would be, and could prevail, if they had more time to prepare.
Britain put the following months to good use – focusing on turning out fighter planes with
newly-developed radar.
Aside from a ready military, another thing Chamberlain lacked was willing allies to join
the fight. The U.S. had its neutrality laws (binding even the president), and Chamberlain had
doubts about France. As for the British, still smarting from the Great War twenty years earlier
and familiar with newsreels of the devastation raining down on Spain from the Luftwaffe, they
wanted no part of it. And Czechoslovakia, after all, was just one of those made-up countries
from the last war. When Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming “peace for our
time”, Britain cheered.
When Hitler took Prague in March 1939, Chamberlain doubled the size of their National
Guard, and the next month oversaw Britain’s first peacetime draft. In September, after 11 months
of strengthening their military following Munich, Britain went to war against Germany.
The costs of the Second World War can never be overstated. It’s disturbing to consider,
however, what course history might have taken had the war begun with the defeat in Central
Europe of whatever there was of the British military In September 1938.
Greg brought up Chamberlain in drawing a comparison with what could be President
Obama’s “legacy”. The comparison may not be that far off. As Nick Baumann wrote in Slate,
“The maligned British prime minister did what we would want any responsible leader to do.”
The president’s responsibility is not to respond to whatever Republicans are complaining about
on Fox News, but to act as a “responsible leader” in protecting our country.
Under our Constitution, Congress has responsibilities, too - with one of the gravest being to
declare war. When President Polk announced in 1846 we were at war with Mexico regardless of
any involvement by Congress, Rep. Abraham Lincoln (R-IL) responded that “Kings had always
been involving and impoverishing their people in wars . . . This our Convention understood to
be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions; and they resolved to so frame the Constitution
that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us.”
Agreeing with Rep. Lincoln’s understanding of Congress’ role, President Obama asked for
its authorization to continue the war against ISIS. While acknowledging its responsibility, the
Republican Congress made clear that rather than drafting the authorization themselves, the
president would have to come to them with the specific language. They’d then have something
new to go and complain about on Fox News.
The House in particular has responsibility for funding those institutions that keep us safe,
like the Department of Homeland Security. Its Republican majority, though, is having too
much fun holding DHS hostage in an attempt to kill President Obama’s actions on immigration
– building on their own legacy of threatening to shut down the government or ruin our nation’s
credit rating if they don’t get their way.
It’s hard to say what President Obama’s ultimate “legacy” will be in foreign affairs. At
least, we know it won’t be anything like George W. Bush’s: 175,000 veterans from Iraq and
Afghanistan who are at least 70% disabled – with 30,000 of those 100% disabled; 6,500 soldiers
and marines with “severe penetrating brain injuries”; 1,700 with one or more limbs amputated;
an unprecedentedly massive and barbarous terrorist organization, ISIS, enabled to establish
itself largely because of the billions in advanced weaponry left behind from the adventures of
George W. Bush.
To encapsulate the president’s “legacy”, Greg offers the quote, “leading from behind”. It was
used by an Obama advisor in an interview with The New Yorker, but originated with Nelson
Mandela in his book, “Long Walk to Freedom”; describing a leadership concept akin to a
shepherd remaining in control of his flock while walking behind it.
It’ll be interesting to see which quotes remain as encapsulations of the Bush legacy; it might
be “We will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.” (Dick Cheney), or maybe “It could last six days, six
weeks. I doubt six months.” (Donald Rumsfeld).
After all that, it would be satisfying enough if the foreign policy legacy of President Obama
simply amounted to Nick Baumann’s characterization of Neville Chamberlain; that he “did
what we would want any responsible leader to do.”
And especially with this Republican Congress, we should be thankful for any indication
there’s a grown-up in the room.
CALIFORNIA’S TRAIN
RIDE INTO THE ABYSS
Most of the news coverage these days is on international and
national events. While there’s some notable legitimacy in that
focus, there are still very important issues to discuss at the state
level. Now’s as good a time as any to return to our California
shores and explore how our state is doing. To hear Governor
Brown tell the story, we’re doing great. He’s upbeat about the future, taking credit for
turning deficits into surpluses, and bullish about the benefits to be derived from additional
massive expenditures into “infrastructure”. Is it real? Have we really turned the corner? Is
our future really golden? Sadly, no. Despite the most heart-felt belief in the fantasy that all
is good, California is heading for a disaster.
According to the Governor himself, his biggest achievement is turning an $18 billion
budget deficit into a $2 billion budget surplus. It’s true enough that tax receipts are up. The
combination of economic recovery, the stock market boom and the “temporary” tax hike
voters approved in 2012 have lifted revenues. So what could be wrong?
Despite the gush of new revenue, California is still running a real deficit as large as
the ones that threatened to cripple us in the past. State government practices accounting
techniques that would put the managers of a private company in jail. These accounting
practices allow the state to simply ignore the deterioration in public pension plan liabilities
that should be covered each year.
Pensions are nothing but promises to pay retirees in future years. They represent a liability
the state must meet. Private companies that offer pensions are required to contribute to the
pension each year to make sure that the liability doesn’t become unfunded – a fancy word
meaning not enough money to meet the liability.
A recent Stanford University study determined that California’s unfunded pension
liabilities for public employees is roughly $300 billion. That’s a huge number, even for a state
our size, but the more dangerous issue is the fact that this unfunded liability is increasing
each year by about $17 billion. It’s increasing because the state is not contributing into the
pension plan each year the money it should contribute.
California is simply ignoring the requirement to pay $17 billion. It’s an expense that
government accounting rules somehow allow the state to skip. Here’s the real math.
Current Budget “Surplus” $2 billion
Less: Pension Expense Being Ignored: -$ 17 billion
Real Budget Deficit $(15) billion
In the real world where you and I live, if we keep racking up real expenses, we really have
to pay them; we can’t just ignore them. There’s a host of federal laws which force private
companies to cover their pension expenses. They can’t ignore them and pretend they don’t
exist any more than you and I can. But Jerry Brown can, and the press lets him get away
with the façade.
Each year, this real deficit adds to our state’s debt. We, our kids, and our grandkids
will have to pay off this debt. It won’t just go away. The situation becomes worse if the
“temporary” tax hike voters approved in 2012 is really temporary. If it goes away (that’s the
meaning of the word temporary), the budget deficit will worsen.
Why is this important? Why is this more than just an accounting debate? The answer
is that behind these numbers are real people who will bear the burden; real people who
will have to pay the debt. Ignoring the people behind these numbers is another one of
Governor Brown’s massive failures. He has failed to stabilize the state’s revenues. Currently,
approximately 1% of the people pay 50% of the taxes. No small group like this should be
responsible for paying this much of the burden. Recent statistics show that these people are
leaving California, and as they do, the deficits will grow worse; the burden on the rest of us
will also grow worse.
Real people, young people trying to start out, trying to survive, trying to get ahead in
California, will be hurt. More and more they will not be able to survive or to get ahead.
The truth is that Governor Brown has presided over the fastest deterioration in our fiscal
structure in state history.
The fact that Governor Brown is claiming credit for artificial improvements in the face
of real deterioration just proves how much of a politician he is. The fact that his response
to all this is to trumpet an unneeded, overpriced high-speed train to nowhere, which will
add even more to the deficit, shows how little he really cares about Californians. Polls show
that he is the most popular politician in the state right now, but polls can be fickle. When
the charade is over, Californians will realize they’re on a train ride into the fiscal abyss.
About the author: Gregory J. Welborn is a freelance writer and has spoken to several
civic and religious organizations on cultural and moral issues. He lives in the Los Angeles
area with his wife and 3 children and is active in the community. He can be reached at
gregwelborn2@gma/5l.com.
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
|