| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Breaking News:Inside
this Week: Calendar: Sierra Madre: Pasadena – Altadena: Around The San Gabriel Valley: Arcadia: Monrovia – Duarte: Just for Best Friends: Education & Youth: Arts and More:
Healthy Lifestyles: The Good Life: The World Around Us: Left / Right & Legals:
Columnists: Recent Issues: |
SATURDAY, APRIL 11, 2015 VOLUME 9 NO. 15 COUNCIL TO TACKLE DIMINISHED REVENUE ISSUE WHILE NEW PETITION TO CIRCULATE IN EFFORT TO ABOLISH USER UTILITY TAX On Tuesday, the Sierra Madre City Council will begin discussions on the impact of the reduction of Utility User Tax income for the budget for the fiscal year of 2015/2016 as well as the following fiscal year 2016/2017. When voters decided not to keep the existing UUT at 10% last year, the rate will decrease by 2% over the next two years until it is down to 6%. With such a significant decline in revenue, finding ways to balance the budget and maintain city services will be a challenge. Unlike like neighboring cities of Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte and Pasadena, Sierra Madre derives less than 2% of its income from Sales Tax and relies on the UUT heavily. The council will begin budget negotiations on Tuesday, April 14th at 6:30 pm. Residents are encouraged to attend. UUT Opponents Launch New Petition There are residents in Sierra Madre who would like to see a total repeal of the UUT. Led by Sierra Madre resident Earl Richey, a new Notice of Intent To Circulate Petition has been issued and the group is authorized to begin collecting signatures in an effort to get the repeal of the UUT on the ballot. (See Notice on Pg. 19) 30 MILLION DOLLAR CLAIM FILED AGAINST SIERRA MADRE CETT Investment Corporation Files Demand Over Stonegate (1 Carter) Development Photo and Story by Susan Henderson Since the Sierra Madre City Council overturn the Planning Commission’s approval of the proposed plans for 610 Baldwin Court in January, 2015, many residents have been wondering what would come next. The action denied the developer’s permit application on the grounds that it did not comply with the city’s existing land use policies. A little less than 3 months later, CETT Investment Corporation took the first step towards suing the city. They filed a “Claim for Damages “ asking for “no less than 30-32 million dollars, including but not limited to the lost value of its land, the lost value of its infrastructure improvements, and the lost profits on the sale of each and all of the residences it is permitted to build in the One Carter Project.” “I’m not surprised”, said Sierra Madre Mayor John Harabedian, who is an attorney by profession. “This is a desperate claim with no merit.” In the filing, CETT says, “..The City of Sierra Madre reversed unanimously [the] Planning Commission decision approving the Hillside Development Permit application” and “instead, denied it for reasons set-forth in City Council Resolution 15-03. Since then, City Staff has arbitrarily and capriciously changed the application process and refused to apply the proper and agreed upon standards for the consideration of the remaining HDP applications”. (The project is approved for 29 single family homes.) In October, when the Planning Commission approved the CETT applications for a Hillside Development Permit and a Conditional Use Permit to begin construction on the first home, the next step in the process was Council approval. Council members Denise Delmar and John Capoccia called for a review of the decision, and an ad hoc committee was formed to take on the task. Council members Delmar and Gene Goss volunteered and on December 10, 2014 they met with the developer’s attorney, Richard McDonald, in an attempt to address the council and community’s concerns - primarily the project’s failure to comply with the HMO. Their attempt was unsuccessful as McDonald was unwilling to make any changes. What followed was the Council’s reversal of the Planning Commission’s decision in its entirety. The staff report presented by Planning and Community Preservation Department detailed the areas where the design was not in compliance with the city’s ordinances. It also included clarification of photos that had been submitted by the developers of existing hillside homes in Sierra Madre. According to the report, none of those structures in the pictures were in the Hillside Management Zone and had been built prior to the last revision of the HMO. The Stonegate project, in its’ entirety (29 homes), is in the Hillside Management Zone. The proposed 3,125 sq. ft. home at 610 Baldwin Court will have to comply with the HMO. While the developer may have felt that the approval by the Planning Commission was a signal to proceed, the denial of the applications by the Council was a clear signal that the other 8 pending applications for Stonegate that in order to get an approval, they too will have to be in compliance with the HMZ. In addition to challenging the City and its administration of the Hillside Management Zone and other local laws, CETT is accusing Sierra Madre of failing to perform in accordance to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement reached in 2010 regarding the development of the project. The claim also states. “The City violated the Brown Act by engaging in closed sessions to discuss the application without any proper basis for doing so”. The continue in the filing by accusing the city of Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing and violation of the developers right to due process and equal protection rights. The city is required to respond within a timely manner, however it should be noted that governmental claims such as this are generally a precursor to a formal lawsuit. Baldwin Ct. development plans were denied by the Sierra Madre City Council earlier this year. Construction activity has come to a halt. CITY LOOKING FOR PUBLIC INPUT ON PROPOSED SMALL-SCALE, WASTE-TO- ENERGY PROJECT By Kim Clymer- Kelley There will be a public meeting and presentation on Wednesday April 15 at 6 PM in the City Council Chambers at Sierra Madre City Hall. The presentation will be on a possible Waste-to- Energy project that the city is in the process of developing. In order to create a system that will best serve and consider the residents and businesses of Sierra Madre, the city would like your input on the project so that your ideas and visions may be incorporated into the project and your concerns addressed. This project, if realized will make Sierra Madre a vanguard city in sustainable waste management and independent green energy production. This small-scale facility could potentially produce enough energy to reduce the city’s energy bill by $16,000 per month and would serve as a main power source for the city’s water system. It would use biomass from the city’s municipal solid waste stream to create clean, green energy, thus diverting 6-8 tons a day from the area landfills, while at the same time offering an opportunity to thoroughly sort recyclables before processing. The facility would give local universities an excellent research opportunity and would serve as a model for how other cities can divert waste and create energy for their municipalities. Waste-to-Energy (WTE)is a common practice in many European nations where land for landfills is scarce, making diversion and recycling essential. These countries use the biomass in their waste stream to create energy and heat for residences and businesses. Here in the US, we have not built any new WTE facilities since the early 1990’s. These new, very simple, clean, and safe technologies make the process a carbon neutral or even a carbon negative process. Yes, some such systems can actually remove carbon from our atmosphere. In addition to electricity, the systems can also provide fuel for vehicles that run on compressed natural gas and produce different types of natural fertilizers and soil enhancers. Keeping the systems small and localized allows for communities to become less dependent on outside energy sources, reduces the impact of the process of waste handling by reducing the many lengthy trips to outside processing facilities, allows a community to customize and control the use of their facility to best serve the city, and reduces the amount of electrical energy lost in transmission. If you want to learn more about the plan, have your ideas considered, or offer your expertise, please join us in this meeting to develop this exciting plan. There will be plenty of opportunity for Q&A and experts on hand to answer your questions. Refreshments will be served. Inside this week: CALENDAR Pg. 2 SIERRA MADRE NEWS Pg. 4 PASADENA/ALTADENA Pg. 5 ARCADIA NEWS Pg. 6 MONROVIA/DUARTE Pg. 6 EDUCATION & YOUTH Pg. 7 FOOD & DRINK ARTS Pg. 8 HEALTHY LIVING Pg. 10 GOOD LIFE Pg. 11 THE WORLD AROUND US Pg. 12 OPINION Pg. 13 LEGAL NOTICES FYI Pg. 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Views News 80 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. #327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.604.4548 www.mtnviewsnews.com |