11
OPINION:
Mountain View News Saturday, February 15, 2020
JOHN MICEK
SECOND AMENDMENT
SANCTUARIES ARE THE
RIGHT'S NEW GUN PUSH
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
CONTRIBUTORS
Mary Lou Caldwell
Kevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James Snyder
Dr. Tina Paul
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Jeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely Toten
Dan Golden
Rebecca Wright
Hail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
When one of the Pennsylvania Legislatures most conservative
members announced her desire to pass Second Amendment
Sanctuary ordinances that defy state and federal gun laws, the
temptation at first was to laugh and shake your head in disbelief.
In barely a year in the state House, Rep. Stephanie Borowicz, a
Republican who hails from rural Clinton County, has proven to
be anything but shy when it comes to courting controversy. So
when Borowicz dropped her press release on Second Amendment
Sanctuaries,it barely registered as a ripple on Twitter.
But as The Trace, a site that tracks gun violence-reduction efforts reports, there is plenty of
reason to pay attention. That's because Borowicz has quietly inserted herself into a movement
that stretches across oemore than 400 municipalities in 20 states.
If the term Second Amendment Sanctuary, sounds familiar, there is a reason for that. As
The Trace reports, backers purposefully modeled them on so-called oeSanctuary Cities,
where local officials decline to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.
We're just stealing the language that sanctuary cities use, Bryan Kibler, the state s attorney
in Effingham County, Illinois, told the Associated Press in 2018, according to The Trace.
The county approved its own oegun sanctuary in April 2018, according to published
reports, saying gun laws then under consideration by the Illinois General Assembly were
unconstitutionally broad.
As The Daily Item of Sunbury, Pa. reported earlier this month, the state branch of a group
called Gun Owners of America has volunteers working statewide on such ordinances. Officials
in Bradford County, along the New York State border enacted such a resolution last
December. Another northeastern Pennsylvania municipality is reportedly considering its
own resolution.
In her statement, Borowicz said she was oeexpressing my complete support for efforts in
two counties in her district to protect law-abiding . residents against unconstitutional gun
control laws imposed in Harrisburg or Washington, D.C.
Among those measures are a proposed oered flag law now before the Legislature that
would allow police, acting on a court-order, to temporarily seize someone s weapons if they
believe they pose an immediate threat to themselves or to public safety.
These extreme risk protection order laws, as they re formally known have been shown in
other states to have reduced gun crimes and suicide.
While legal experts and others believe oeSecond Amendment Sanctuaries are mostly
symbolic and not legally binding, others say that they could lead to expensive litigation for
local governments that decline to enforce state and federal gun laws.
To the extent that police chiefs and especially prosecutors view these actions by local governments
as reflections of widespread community sentiment, they may feel more comfortable
in adjusting their own exercise of discretion in making arrests and in charging
decisions, George Mason University law professor Nelson Lund told The Daily Item. oeAt
least in that sense, it is probably not accurate to characterize them as mere publicity stunts.
Ultimately, the final battle over these local ordinances will be waged in the courts.
The proper procedure if law enforcement officers and local governments have issue with
new laws is to bring legal action in the courts, and have courts determine whether those
laws are constitutional, Jonathan Lowy, the vice president of the legal action project at the
gun reform group Brady, told The Trace.
There is no small irony here that the very legislators and officials pursuing these sanctuary
protections are those who kick back the hardest when local officials, tired of federal and
state-level inaction on gun violence-reduction issues, move to enact ordinances stronger
than those in existing federal law.
Such was the case when officials in Pittsburgh enacted tough local ordinances in the wake
of a murderous spree at the Tree of Life Synagogue in 2018 that claimed the lives of 11
people.
Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, a Republican and outspoken gun-rights activist,
called for Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto s impeachment as a result.
Republicans already have an image problem with voters when it comes to gun issues. They
ll have even more explaining to do when a mass shooting erupts in one of their Second
Amendment paradises.
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
and reserves the right to
refuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
LEFT TURN /RIGHT TURN
STUART TOLCHIN
KIA ORA
TOM PURCELL
As I have written over
the past few months I’ve
been feeling pretty unsafe
and frightened not only
by the possibility of a
Trump re-election, but
also by the failure of
this Country and other
Countries to direct
their efforts toward the
common good. This is
a time when all nations
should make efforts
to work together based on the obvious need
to find the common ground to allow for the
maintenance of the planet and all of its sentient
inhabitants. As one of those at least presently
sentient inhabitants I am very concerned but
as I wrote last week I believe, or at least want to
believe, that Mr. Trump will not be re-elected
and that internationally all countries will
recognize the present emergencies and will
together begin to work for the common good.
I promised myself that I would look for
positive signs in the coming weeks that would
indicate a recognition of the elimination of
differences and the expression of the necessity
to internationally work together. What I
saw last week during the Academy Award
Presentations was certainly not enough to put
all worries to rest but there were certainly signs
that times could change and that opposing
sides could come together. This morning I had
breakfast with a fifty year old colleague and
remarked to him that I was absolutely amazed
that Jane Fonda, of all people, acted as the
representative of the entire Academy and was
chosen to bid the viewing public good night.
For those of you who don’t recall,
during the 1970”s Jane Fonda, yes the Jane
Fonda of Grace and Frankie, was the most
reviled celebrity in the United States. During
the Viet Nam War, I hope you remember
that, she had gone to North Viet Nam as a
sympathizer with Ho Chi Minh and a famous
picture was taken of her astride a rocket.
She was called Hanoi Jane and all good
Americans of the time hated her. The place
she has presently in our collective hearts now
illustrates the way things can and will change.
It is a good sign. Referring again to the Oscar
Presentation there were multiple positive
indications that we are moving toward an
appreciation of the need to eliminate National
differences and work together for the common
good. The category formerly known as the
best foreign language Film had been renamed
Best International Film arguably a recognition
of common work rather than of separation.
The winner in this category was the Korean
Language film Parasite which was also
nominated for the most-honored prize, Best
Picture of the Year. Yes it won, the first non-
English Language picture to win the award and
a hopeful sign of international respect.
There were more surprises. The award
presented to the Best Actor in a motion picture
was presented to Joaquin Phoenix who gave
an amazing acceptance speech in which he
passionately and emotionally plead for sanity,
justice, and change. He announced that he was
using his voice for the voiceless and went so far
as to question the morality and the sensitivity
of human beings who are indifferent to the
welfare of other human beings, other sentient
beings, and to the planet itself. His expressed
concern for cows whose children were ripped
away from them and their milk then stolen was
a concern I had never heard before.
Finally, I want to discuss the
presentation of the Screenwriting Oscar to a
remarkable screenwriter-director-actor. This
man describes himself as an indigenous person,
half Maori (the indigenous inhabitants of New
Zealand) and half-Jewish. He calls himself
a Polynesian-Jew and often uses the name
Taika Waititi Cohen. In his acceptance speech
he emphasized the despicable behavior that
Europeans have exhibited toward the indigenous
cultures that have been almost genocidically
destroyed and forgotten. In his acceptance
speech he stated “the Academy would like
to acknowledge that we have gathered on the
ancestral land of the Tongan, the Tataviam and
the Chumash. We acknowledge them as the
first people of this land on which the motion
picture community lives and works”. Certainly
most of us have forgotten or are completely
indifferent to this history. I believe that this
statement is intended to make all of us, who
are momentarily secure and comfortable,
aware that we cannot maintain this position
unless we are aware of our insensitivities of
the past and make every effort to correct them
in the future. In the film, which he created,
Mr. Waititi Cohen plays Adolph Hitler as an
imaginary friend of a ten year old boy. At first
the boy, like many German people of the time,
adores his Hitler; but over time realizes that
Hitler, like all-false Gods demanding obeyance,
is unworthy of his adoration. The film ends
with the boy kicking his imaginary friend out
the window whereupon Hitler explodes into
nothingness. There is, I believe, a message here
for Americans.
Mr. Waititi ends his speech with two
untranslated Maori words KIA ORA. I looked
these words up in my iphone and the words
are understood to have the meaning “Go in
Health- Be Safe! Amazingly when my Yiddish
grandmother would send me off to School in
scary Southside Chicago (my parents were
already opening our grocery store –Stuart
Food Mart) she would say in a language I never
understood very well Gay Gezunt which I now
look up in my iphone and learn, what I already
instinctively knew, that it means Go in Health
and Be Safe.
So the Jews and their very distant fellow
inhabitants of the planet had this continual
hope for the children. Go in good health and
return that way. This, I am sure is the hope
that all peoples of the world, past, present, and
future hold for their children. This common
hope must be recognized if the future of our
children is what we all wish for them. I am so
relieved to find hints that this dream of mine
and yours and everyone else can be realized.
Kia ora
Gay gezunt
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUDDLE:
BERNIE UNDERWHELMS THE
YOGI BERRA DEMOCRATS
Yogi Berra has
a timely warning
for the fractured
Democratic
party. The
baseball legend
and accidental
oracle is reputed to have said, oeIt gets
late early out here.
Translation: Democrats better get
their act together - rallying behind a
candidate who can actually beat Donald
Donald - and doing it sooner rather
than later, lest they tear themselves
apart in a marathon slog to the mid-
summer national convention.
The results Tuesday night in New
Hampshire make that task more urgent
than ever. If Democrats fail to coalesce
behind someone with moderate
crossover appeal, they re going to be
stuck with Bernie Sanders - the GOP
s dream opponent, for reasons that are
obvious to everyone except his zealots.
Yeah, he won the primary. But he eked
it out with the lowest winning percentage
- 26 percent - in the history
of the primary. Four years ago in New
Hampshire, he got 152,000 votes. This
time, he got roughly 75,000. Granted,
the field of rivals this time was much
bigger than in 2016, but that s because
many in the party know darn
well that Sanders, with his oesocialist
tag, would be a big beautiful cake on
Trump s plate.
Even though Sanders is holding his
core base of Bernie Bros, he has yet
to demonstrate that he can expand
his appeal and unite the party. And
his Bros certainly don t help; at victory
headquarters Tuesday night, they
booed Pete Buttigieg. Because that s
how the Bros roll.
But here s the problem: If the more
electable Democrats keep divvying up
the not-Sanders voters, Sanders will
keep winning with tepid pluralities
and will eventually cement an unbeatable
delegate lead. He s also far better
organized and financed than Buttigieg
and Amy Klobuchar, who is now faced
with the daunting task of ramping up
in time for Nevada, South Carolina,
and 15-state Super Tuesday.
I haven t yet mentioned Joe Biden. It
s hard to do so without wincing. It s
like watching a car wreck. If Sanders
is stopped, it s seems unlikely that Joe
will do the deed.
Biden limped out of New Hampshire
in fifth place with a paltry 8 percent,
the worst showing for a former vice
president since Dan Quayle pulled
out of the 2000 Republican race five
months before the primary. Fun fact:
This is Biden s third presidential bid,
and he has yet to win a caucus or
primary.
The former vice president has fled to
South Carolina, where he believes that
black voters will be his firewall in state
s Feb. 29 primary. But that s a shaky
assumption. Black voters are jonesing
to defeat a detestably racist president,
and even though they respect Biden s
partnership with Barack Obama, they
re not likely to stick with a candidate
who has the whiff of a loser.
No Democrat can win the White
House without strong black support
and turnout. But if not Biden, who?
Sanders has shown no ability to rally
them (although he s making some
gains with Hispanics). Buttigieg and
Klobuchar are starting from scratch
with the black community. And in
white New Hampshire, Elizabeth Warren
(have we mentioned her yet?) didn
t even score with whites, finishing in a
distant fourth-place finish. Faced with
likely fundraising woes going forward,
she may not be around long enough
to woo voters of color. As for Mike
Bloomberg, the Democrats wild card,
he s been busy this week apologizing
anew for his mayoral stop-and-frisk
program - a past sin that could hamper
his own outreach.
Bottom line: There s no clarity in sight,
because Democrats remain divided
along racial, generational, class, and
ideological lines. For now, Sanders
is strongest with the lefty young and
white working-class folks lacking college
degrees. Buttigieg and Klobuchar
are strongest with (and fighting each
other for) older folks, suburbanites
with college degrees, and more moderate
voters. And with Biden fading,
nobody knows where voters of color
are likely to go. But a winning Democratic
coalition requires unity among
all.
Warren, in her concession speech
Tuesday night, pleaded for Democrats
to come together, to stop their fractious
infighting. In her words, candidates
should not oeburn down the rest
of the party to be the last man standing
.We can t afford to fall into factions.
Or, as Yogi Berra also warned, oeYou
ve got to be very careful if you don t
know where you are going, because
you might not get there.
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|