OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, February 19, 2022 13 OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, February 19, 2022 13
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
AGE ADJUSTMENT
Last Saturday, as I walked down the hill into the
town center. I was invited to sit down with two older
guys seated at an outside table. I don’t why they invited
me to sit down but I welcomed the opportunity to take
a breather. Over the years the walk from my home up
in the canyon down to the town center has become increasingly
exhausting. In fact I now telephone my wife
to come to my aid and come and get me.
There is a fact that makes this possible. Cell phones al
low me to make the call which will be received because
my wife almost always has her phone with her. The existence
of the cellphone has resulted in an adjustment in my attitude about long walks
and I am much healthier as a result. Nevertheless I have to adjust to the fact that
I am now an old person. Although I shy away from mirrors I am pretty sure that I
look like a wrinkled white-haired old person walking slowly with my hands behind
my back. When and how this happened I don’t know. Inside I feel almost exactly
the same; it’s only when I try to do anything that I notice the difference. You know
getting out of the car is difficult; putting on my socks is impossible, and for some
reason my clothes are always wanting to stay inside out.
Let me try and explain. I am now, after 57 years of practice, a retired lawyer.
When you are a practicing lawyer you are used to be taken seriously. Lawyers advise
people, explain things and make predictions and stand up in front of audiences
and make opening and closing arguments. All that changes with retirement, at least
it has for me. My successful lawyer daughter, probably wisely, rarely asks for my
advice. I have no new clients asking for my direction. I become aware of this when
very occasionally an old client will call and ask my opinion about something. This
feels good but is not the way I am now treated by the world at large. .
I still want to be taken seriously and write these articles in the hope of having
a positive effect upon the world.
Of course, now that I am retired I have the time to make other adjustments including
a willingness to enter into conversation with people of very different beliefs and
attitudes. Returning to the conversation I had with the two strangers last Saturday,
in just a few minutes it became clear that we had very different political attitudes.
What I remember now about the conversation was that these two men were Republicans
who believe white people were now being discriminated against and that
Critical Race Theory was intended to make white people feel guilty. The men said
that all people who were homeless did that by choice. Uncharacteristically I did not
get up and scream. We kept talking and I gave each of them a copy of the papers
from the stand next to us which contained an article of mine discussing similar
concerns. One of the men actually read it or parts of it. Afterwards both men said
that they were there every Saturday and would enjoy talking with me again. Who
knows? Maybe I will –let’s face it; after a long walk I can always use a place to sit
down, especially if there are people to talk with. More importantly, there is
a kind of progress that can result.
If we can agree upon what is factual, our attitudes may well be affected. The men
stated their belief that continuing residential racial segregation was the result of
personal preferences to choose to live around similar people. This, I believe can be
shown to be factually untrue. Governmental policies refusing GI loans to minority
people and a policy of redlining limiting minority people to less desirable areas
have caused tremendous problems. Not only are minorities deprived of decent
schools, employment opportunities, and adequate health services but also they have
been prevented from acquiring the equity in their homes which would allow for
economic advancement. There are factual connections. I am old enough to realize
that attitudes do not change overnight and that facts are needed to support or
modify beliefs. I think it is possible to bring about common factual understanding
through actual discussion.
Politics should not be a religion requiring rigid adherence but rather should be an
attempt to factually examine social conditions. This, I believe, is a necessary adjustment
which should be undertaken by people of all ages—even old ones like me.
JOHN MICEK
BULLIES LIKE PUTIN UNDERSTAND
ONE LANGUAGE
If this were an ordinary column, I’d offer some neat prescription
or exhort policymakers to take action on the solution
to the crisis happening in Ukraine that’s staring them
in the face.
But the truth is that I don’t have a pithy solution or a soundbite-
sized call to action as the United States and its allies
confront a humanitarian disaster in the making.
There are no easy answers. The fact that we are even in this
place to begin with is the fruit of two decades of failures and
missteps, across presidential administrations, to bring Russian
strongman Vladimir Putin to heel.
I do, however, know one thing: There is only one language
that a bully and murderous thug such as Putin understands. And if our nation and elected
leaders truly are serious about defending liberal democracy in Ukraine and around the
world , they have to speak loudly, and with one voice, and tell Putin he can go no further.
I realize this is far easier said than done. It’s hard enough for the United States to speak with
one voice at home on the most basic of issues.
It is a problem exacerbated by our polarized politics and the sad reality that there’s a whole
segment of one of the major political parties that has proven, through its actions on Jan. 6
and beyond, that it has little to no interest in democratic norms. It can appallingly dismiss
the carnage of that horrible day as an exercise in legitimate political discourse, and actively
try to erase from its ranks those who think otherwise.
I am also painfully aware of the kind of reality distortion field that must be erected to decry
Putin’s war of choice in Ukraine, even as the specter of three decades of American misadventures
in the Persian Gulf and a war of choice in Iraq glares over our collective shoulder.
But it’s clear that every tool in the international community’s arsenal, short of direct force,
has to be deployed as Putin tries to reset the international order that traces its origins to the
fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of the former Soviet Union that followed just
a few years later. Make no mistake, that is his goal – a resurgent Russia that stands above
the west.
On Thursday, President Joe Biden piled more sanctions on Russia, decrying Putin’s “brutal
assault” on Ukraine and its people. The Pentagon ordered an additional 7,000 soldiers to
Europe, a move that cheered allies but surely sent a shudder through American military
families already weary of more than two decades of continuous war.
On Thursday, a veteran armed forces officer told me that they were closely watching developments
in Ukraine unfold, and the Pentagon’s response to it.
The officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, so that they could speak freely, said a U.S.
response could start with such rapidly deployable forces as the 82nd Airborne Division, as
was the case with the evacuation of Kabul Airport last year. Indeed, elements of the 82nd
already have deployed to Poland, according to published reports.
A military response is surely the least palatable and most potentially catastrophic option.
History teaches that ground engagements with the Russians never end well.
As one expert notes, that currently does not appear to be in the cards. Instead, “the U.S. is
rallying the world to isolate Russia through economic sanctions and to respond to cyber attacks,”
analyst Jon Hutson wrote on Twitter.
And with Putin muttering threateningly about nuclear strikes if the west launches reprisal
attacks, according to The Telegraph, the West cannot engage in similar saber-rattling. That’s
effectively how Europe blundered into World War I.
Still, there’s no middle ground here. This is a battle between good and evil.
“Everything that the Kremlin says is a lie. Please don’t both sides this,” podcaster and analyst
Terrell Jermaine Starr wrote on Twitter on Thursday. “Putin is killing innocent people and
Ukraine did nothing to deserve it.”
That’s a message that needs to be repeated over and over again.
An award-winning political journalist, John L. Micek is Editor-in-Chief of The Pennsylvania
Capital-Star in Harrisburg, Pa.
RICH JOHNSON NOW THAT’S RICH
PRESIDENTIAL PETS
You can blame my daughter, Olivia, for the
content of this column. She suggested I talk
about presidential pets. Wow! What a great
idea. I mean, how better to judge the character
of a president than by analyzing the kinds of
pets they surround themselves with.
Now you might think most chief executives
had dogs. You’d be wrong. Jefferson didn’t. And
neither did 17 other presidents. Joe Biden gets credit for having the first
shelter rescue dog to live at the White House. A German Shepherd named
Major. Or, is that his rank. Don’t know. He’ll probably be called General
before too long. The Biden’s also welcomed Willow the cat. Do pets get
secret service protection?
President Obama made a campaign promise to daughters Sasha and Malia.
A Presidential puppy. And daddy delivered Bo, a male Portuguese
Water Dog (a gift from Ted Kennedy). In 2013 the Obamas adopted Sunny,
a female Portuguese Water Dog.
Four presidents had no pets at all. Donald Trump, Chester Arthur, Franklin
Pierce, and Millard Fillmore. How can you get elected without having
at least one pet?
Six presidents had parrots. George Washington had a parrot. So did Madison,
Jackson, Grant, Roosevelt and McKinley.
A Fascinating paradox is the only president to have an elephant was a
democrat, James Buchanan. And the only president to have a donkey was
a republican, Calvin Coolidge. A donkey and a elephant? It makes me
wonder what other exotic animals have taken up residence at the White
House.
Let’s see: I wonder if John Quincy Adams took his pet alligator out for
walks down Pennsylvania Avenue? He had one. Martin Van Buren had
two tiger cubs. Andrew Johnson, white mice. Ulysses S. Grant had goats
and gooses.
The two presidents that take the cake at having the most presidential pets.
Teddy Roosevelt and Calvin Coolidge. (Both republicans, hmmmmm)
Get this: Calvin Coolidge had a terrier, sheepdog, bulldog, shepherd,
birder, 4 collies, and 2 chows. Added to that he had 3 canaries, 3 cats, 2
raccoons, a donkey, bobcat, thrush, a goose, mockingbird, a bear, pygmy
hippo, an antelope, and a wallaby. Oh and don’t forget the lion cubs.
Teddy Roosevelt, no slouch in the pet department, befriended a retriever,
Pekingese, mutt, 2 terriers, 2 cats, a badger, pony, macaw, snakes, 12 horses,
5 bears, 5 guinea pigs, rats, lizards, roosters, an owl, flying squirrel,
raccoon, a coyote, a lion, hyena and a zebra.
The names of some of these presidential pets are too good to pass up.
Grant named one of his horses Jeff Davis (all you Civil War buffs will get
it). James Garfield had Veto the dog. And Abraham Lincoln had Jack the
turkey. Isn’t this all just fascinating? Anybody? Anybody?
JJ JUKEBOX news!! If you like rock and roll from the 50s through the
70s, the band I’m privileged to perform with, JJ Jukebox will be playing,
Saturday, March 12th at Nano Café, 322 West Sierra Madre Blvd., Sierra
Madre.
The concert is from 6:30 – 9:30: Affectionately know as the “In Bed By
Ten Tour”. We sell out to call in your dining, drinking and dancing reservation
soon by calling (626) 325-3334. We look forward to seeing you.
Live music most every Saturday, so check it out!!
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.
|