Mountain Views-News Saturday, April 2, 2022
MONASTERY MINUTE:
By Robert Gjerde
CAN THE SIERRA MADRE HANDLE THE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC FROM
THE MEADOWS PROJECT?
If there is one thing Los Angeles is known for it is traffic. Sierra Madre is so idyllic because it
seems to escape the hustle and bustle of the “big city.”
There is concern that the Meadows homes and three acre park will cause an unreasonable increase
in traffic. The Environmental Impact Report (Appendix K), using the State required traffic
standards based on Vehicle Miles Traveled, determined the impact will be “less than significant”.
This metric doesn’t tell us what the tangible impact will be. For that we can look at the Fehr and
Peer traffic study which shows existing trips to or from homes and the Monastery at 340 per day.
After the Meadows project is complete that will increase that to 710 trips per day. The most impacted
intersection of Sunnyside Ave. and Fairview Ave. will have just under 600 trips per day.
That might sound like a lot, but if we look at the worst case scenario and assume all that traffic
is squeezed into a 12 hour period, that is 50 cars per hour or less than one car per minute. If we
compare that to the peaceful Upper Canyon, with 85 homes (served by a single 20’ wide street),
there are about 1000 trips per day. That is 83 cars per hour or 66% more traffic than Sunnyside
Ave. and Fairview Ave. will experience.
The Meadows project will not create an unreasonable amount of traffic by adding less than one
car every two minutes.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Dear Editor:
In his letter to the editor that appeared in the March
26, 2022 edition of the Mountain Views News, John
Doyle of “Neighbors for Fairness in Sierra Madres”
asks: “What if it were your property?”
He also invokes the 1st Amendment and damage to
the property rights of Mater Dolorosa.
If it is the private property of “Mater Dolorosa” isn’t
the disposition of the land their decision?
Oh, they are a religion. The 1st Amendment says
that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof;”
And congress, via the tax laws, have decreed that
churches (and non-profit organizations) do not have
to pay property and other taxes.
If I wanted to have a religion of the Great Green
Grasshopper and have church property on which I
don’t pay taxes then I have to comply with laws established
by Congress that decide whether I qualify
as a religion. That pretty much sounds like “Congress
making a law respecting the establishment of
religion.”
The real questions are:
1) Do the owners of a property have the right to
dispose of it as they wish? Of course they do. 2) Do
JUST THE FACTS: THE MEADOWS
DEVELOPMENT AND RELIGIOUS
FREEDOM
I’m not fond of bickering, but I am fond of getting
facts right and John Doyle’s rebuttal of my letter to
the editor had so many misstatements I feel I need
to step up again.
First he claims I was trying to hide the “real” purpose
of the proposed initiative which asks the voters
to require the Mater Dolorosa “monastery” development
be consistent with current Hillside zoning.
He claims the initiative secretly “seeks to outlaw any
institutional expansion of the property ever and to
restrict residential development to untenably large
parcels, essentially rendering the Mater Dolorosa
property incapable of development”.
That’s simply wrong. The initiative asks that the
citizens of Sierra Madre vote to require the developers
to follow the current Hillside provisions in the
city’s General Plan for buildings in similar parts of
the city, if the project is approved. It does not prevent
them from developing. It does prevent them
from developing under a new Specific Plan they
drafted, full of special provisions just for those 42
homes and apart from and not approved for the rest
of the city.
More importantly, John claims the initiative and
other efforts to resist the development of 42 homes
on the property violates the religious freedom of the
current owners, the Passionist Fathers organization
of Chicago. Specifically, he cites the Religious Land
Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)
and claims the initiative violates it.
The RLUIPA states: “No government shall impose
or implement a land use regulation in a manner
that imposes a substantial burden on the religious
exercise of a person, including a religious assembly
or institution, unless the government demonstrates
that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly,
or institution—" and goes on to detail how
that is implemented.
It is a good law that helps protect against religious
religious organizations, and other non-profit organizations,
deserve exemptions from paying taxes?
No, they don’t. There should not be any exemptions
on the responsibilities of an entity under the laws of
the United States.
Take a look at the 14th Amendment to the
Constitution:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens
of the United States and of the State wherein they
reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens
of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws.”
Tax law considers corporations as a “person”.
Churches and non-profits are therefore corporate
persons. They too should pay taxes and have the
same rights to life, liberty and property that are
guaranteed to all citizens of the United States and
the equal protection of the laws. They should also
have the same responsibilities which include paying
taxes.
Let religions and other non-profit organizations pay
their “fair share”. All is all. Equal is equal.
Ronald Walker, Citizen
discrimination and government intrusion in toReligious activities.
But building 42 homes is not a religious activity. It
is a money making activity to generate up to $200M
for the Passionist Fathers and the developer New
Urban West. And it will forever impact and change
our community if it goes on unchecked.
Property rights are not religious rights if the use
is not religious. And the wider community has a
say when builders do something that impacts their
neighbors. Would it be violating the Passionists’
religious freedom if the city prevented them from
building a slaughterhouse or a nuclear powerplant
or a skyscraper on that property?
When I joined the SM General Plan Steering Committee
(GPSC), the property was already zoned as
“institutional”. Institutional zoning means the owners
are free to develop anything they want that is
institutional in nature; such as a church, religious
school, or whatever religious activity they want. It
does not allow them to build housing.
The GPSC spent years polling and meeting with our
fellow citizens to develop a plan that reflects their
desires for Sierra Madre. When the city approved
the General Plan, we did not do anything in particular
aimed at Mater Dolorosa; we established guidelines
that the community as a whole desired for all
of Sierra Madre. The zoning of that area has a long
history, starting with its original zoning as low density
residential. This was updated, along with the
rest of the city, in a long process starting in the 80’s
where zoning for hillside portions of the city and
for institutions such as churches and schools were
designated consistent with the long standing desire
of Sierra Madre residents that this town maintain its
small town character and ties to the natural mountain
landscape.
As honored fellow citizens, the owners of the Mater
Dolorosa should honor the General Plan when
they develop their property and do so according to
the Hillside provisions. That is what the initiative is
asking the citizens of Sierra Madre to vote for.
Ed Miller, SIerra Madre
WHAT’S IN THE MATER DOLOROSA HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONING INITIATIVE?
WALKING SIERRA MADRE - The Social Side
by Deanne Davis
“Wistaria…this violet vision carries me
to a magical dreamland!”
The weather was perfect for the Wistaria Festival
last Sunday, crisp, sunny, not too hot and everyone
who came to see wistaria got to see it at City Hall and
around town. Hopefully, tours through the actual
vine will be available again next year, but a good time
was had by all who came to Sierra Madre. There now,
a little good news!
Here’s a little more good news: Savor the Flavor looks
incredible and is incredible in their new location on
Baldwin. Such a beautiful store, filled with unique
goodies. If you can’t find the perfect gift in there,
you’re just not trying.
And a little more…A new sandwich shop where Subway
was! How delightful to find something delicious filling an empty space.
And one last piece of good and exciting news…Shelby Scribner has opened a small lash
salon on Baldwin and East Highland. You can call her or text her at (626) 755-7404 if
you’d like your eyelashes augmented and glamorized.
There now, good news abounds, including the rain last Monday night. Chuck Seitz, my
official rain measurement expert tells me 2.6 inches soaked into our dry and thirsty
land.
“Why does it take a minute to say hello and forever to say goodbye?”
“Throughout the years, amidst my tears, I will call your name.”
“And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death,
neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain...” Rev. 21:4
“How blessed I am to have known someone who was so hard to say goodbye to.” This
Friday, April 1st, would have been our 55th anniversary. This coming Monday, April
4th, is my birthday. Alas, it is one of those significant birthdays which will be celebrated
with great gusto and enthusiasm by my family. I shall celebrate by changing my age.
I have been 29 a number of times but, as I mentioned, this is one of those significant
birthdays and so I shall change my age to 39, like Jack Benny, who was 39 about as
many times as I was 29. I shall also celebrate by going to dinner at P F Chang’s with
our daughter, Crissy, her husband, Chris, and granddaughters Jessie and Emily. It is my
intention to order dozens of dumplings, some sushi, some kung pao shrimp and everything
else we could possibly want, including dessert and Mai Tais.
As is our custom, we shall take pictures by the giant stone horse out in front and have
the best time imaginable, trying hard not to notice the empty chair that should be occupied
by John, my dearest friend and husband of 55 years, who will be celebrating our
anniversary in heaven where I am sure they must have pan-fried dumplings, sushi and
really good wine. Jesus talked about wine many times. In fact, his first public miracle
was turning water into really good wine at the marriage feast in Cana. Remember?
When the master of ceremonies of the wedding tasted the water that had been turned
into wine, he called the bridegroom aside and said, “Wow! Everybody brings out the
choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had plenty to drink;
but you have saved the best till now!” Jn. 2:9-10
April 4th is also the birthday of my friend Arne Kalm, who will be celebrating his birthday
with John in heaven. Celia, Arne’s wife and best friend wholeheartedly agrees with
me that we are saying goodbye to beloved friends and family way more often than we
ever expected we would, and finding ourselves wondering what we’re going to do with
the rest of our lives now the person we expected to be going out to dinner with someplace
fun for the next fifty years or so, instead is sharing bread and wine with the Lord
Himself. How blessed we both have been, Celia and I, to have known and loved such
exceptional men for so many years. Men about whom it was said their lives were well
lived. As another good friend pointed out to me, good persons need to be talked about!
If you know a good person who should be talked about…talk about them! Tell the
world how grateful you are you know them. I have a really good person who should be
talked about who is also an April 4th birthday guy: Grandson, Brady Benjamin Davis,
who is going to be 7! Here he is with his mommy, Michon. Seeing that happy face is just
one more little bit of good news.
The day the Lord created Hope was probably the same day he created Spring.” Bern
Williams
Rejoice dear friends, it’s Spring! Look for flowers, look for hummingbirds, look for
amazing sunrises and sunsets. Speaking of hummingbirds, Ken Fong’s photos of hummingbirds,
which I see frequently on Facebook are absolutely awesome!
One last thought: Until further notice, celebrate everything!!
My book page: Amazon.com: Deanne Davis
Easter is just a few weeks away and “The Crown” my story about what happened to
that infamous crown of thorns is now a real book in addition to a Kindle.
It’s available on Amazon.com and it’s only $3.99
If you want to check it out, here’s the link where you can see a short video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_pC0X286T8
SIERRA MADRE COMMUNITY
FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES
GRANTS
The Sierra Madre Community Foundation
(SMCF) recently awarded the following grants
to local organizations:
• The Sierra Madre Post Office Landscape
project received a grant to install a drip-
irrigation system and purchase native plants.
• The Sierra Madre Elementary School
received a grant to promote mental health issues
for students and staff through art, essay,
poster, and video contests.
• The Sierra Madre Public Library
received three grants to support several
programs:
o The annual Bookmark Contest, a
community-wide outreach program
o The outdoor reading program “Walk
This Way Story Adventure” in Memorial Park
o Family Science Workshops, a six-
week summer program hosted by local teach-
For a couple of weeks, we’ve been talking to
people about the current “Mater Dolorosa
Hillside Zoning Initiative” being circulated
throughout Sierra Madre. It seems as if many
of those who have signed the petition either
have a misunderstanding about what will be
asked of the voters or what effect it will have
on an institution’s ability to use their private
property.
Others who have signed the petition have the
misconception that the proposed project will
change the character or quaintness of the entire
City. In our 58 years of living in Sierra
Madre, first in the Canyon, and then on East
Grandview, we have seen many changes, including
several housing projects – all except
for the Jameson property, are above Grand-
view. We can honestly say that in those years
the character or quaintness of Sierra Madre
has not gone away. In fact, it has been enhanced
as our new neighbors have brought
their talents and individual personalities to
our City.
The claim of some is that the wildlife that interface
with our City will be displaced. This
is simply not true. The wildlife will have
space around and behind the Retreat Center,
in Bailey Canyon Park, and all of the foothills
behind Sierra Madre. In fact, where we live
the deer have chosen to graze and rest under
our Jacaranda tree even though there is
a “Meadow” just three doors up from our
house.
Mater Dolorosa has been a major part of Sierra
Madre’s fabric for 100 years. The Initiative
is directly aimed at violating the very
purpose of the Mater Dolorosa's existence.
The Initiative states, “The intent of this Initiative
is to permit the continued operation
of the Mater Dolorosa Passionists Retreat
Center without expansion, significant physi
cal alteration, or change in use, as a nonconforming
use.” (Italics mine). This is the
most restrictive covenant that can be placed
on their property without it being a complete
taking. The Initiative covers the entire property
owned by Mater Dolorosa, not just the
area of the proposed project. It negates the
current Institutional zoning. In other words,
hypothetically, should the Passionists want
to convert their Retreat Center into a Retirement
Home that would not be allowed under
the proposed change to the Hillside Residential
Zone.
Further, under Section 5, the Initiative states,
“It is the intent of the voters that the City of
Sierra Madre retains its authority. . . . However
no such authority shall be exercised in
a manner that undermines or is inconsistent
with the provisions of this Initiative, unless
an amendment of this Initiative is approved
by the voters” thus restricting Mater Dolo
er Dany Richey.
Combined with earlier grants, the SMCF has
awarded $4,400 in grants this year to support
local civic and community organizations, including
the City of Sierra Madre’s Mt. Wilson
Trail Kids Fun Run and the Sierra Madre
Search & Rescue team.
“Through the generous giving of residents,
we’re pleased to support local organizations
which provide engaging programs and
key services for our community,” said Frank
Moore, Community Foundation chair.
Sierra Madre Community Foundation is singularly
devoted to the Sierra Madre and solicits
donations to support and enhance the
community. In addition, the SMCF assists
other Sierra Madre community groups in the
collection and distribution of their funds that
enable ongoing program support and continued
operations.
If you would like more information about this
topic or would like to donate, please visit sier
rosa from making any changes to their property
unless they create an Initiative of their
own to be placed on the ballot. Not even
City officials can change the zoning by application
or request to the Planning Department
should this Initiative pass. How is this
fair? Any other property owner in the City
can apply for a permit to build, a change in
zoning, or other use of their property. Why
discriminate against this particular property
owner?
By supporting this Initiative, you are, in effect,
approving the violation of a 100-year
religious institution’s right to further expand
their ministry. Please do not sign this petition
or if you have already done so, you may
request to have your signature removed by
contacting the city clerk.
De and Pat Alcorn, Sierra Madre Neighbors
for Fairness
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|