13 Mountain Views-News Saturday, April 2, 2022 OPINION 13 Mountain Views-News Saturday, April 2, 2022 OPINION
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
WE DON’T TALK ABOUT…
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
RICH JOHNSON NOW THAT’S RICH
NATIONAL
EMPANADA DAY
APRIL 8, 2022!
The culinary arts have always been a favorite
topic of mine. Probably because
my Scandinavian heritage is not known
for enjoyable (let alone edible) delicacies.
At last count how many Norwegian
Restaurants have you dined at? Zero!
Am I right?
The day, at the tender age of 13, after arriving in sunny Southern
California from the frozen tundra known as Minnesota, I
discovered Mexican food.
OMG! My taste buds discovered flavor for the first time. Little
did I realize I was suddenly thrust into an eternal struggle
known as the battle of the bulge.
About a year ago, I experienced my first empanada. The pinnacle
of Latin food. Empanada literally means “stuffed pastry”.
The beauty of the empanada is you can have empanadas stuffed
with just about any filling your heart (and palate) desires. Meat,
cheese, vegetables, fruit, chocolate. Empanadas can be an appetizer,
breakfast, lunch or dinner entrée, dessert, even a bedtime
snack!
So where can you get the perfect empanada? Remember two locations.
First “Lord Empanada”! Not all empanadas are created
equal. You want the best…go to Lord Empanada. 1540 So. Myrtle
Ave (a block south of the 210 freeway Myrtle offramp (East
side). Their phone number (626) 415-1044. Enjoy a meal there
or “Lord” Empanada, aka Ryan Lopez, will also tell you of other
local dining spots where you can enjoy his empanadas. By the
way, their website is lordempanada.com. And Lord Empanada
serves a lot more than empanadas. Check out their website.
If you are near South Pasadena, you can also enjoy delicious
empanadas at the Waverly Bookshop Café and Cooking School.
1010 ½ Fair Oaks Ave. (626) 460-6027. Stop in, meet proprietor
and single mom, Sandy Olivas (she raised her kids in Sierra
Madre). Enjoy an empanada or three with delicious coffee.
Their website is waverlyla.com. Waverly also has a variety
of vegan empanadas, vegan pastries and pies. Plus a cooking
school for all ages. And Waverly commits a percentage of sales
to various charities. Visit Waverly’s website at Waverlyla.com.
And if you like fun rock from the 60s and 70s, April 23rd is
the next JJ Jukebox concert at Nano Café. 322 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd. Sierra Madre. Best time to make reservations is Wednesday
through Saturday after 4:00pm. Call the restaurant at (626)
325-3334.
Have a good week!
Of course we
do: That is all
anybody seems
to be talking
about. Today is
Wednesday and
perhaps by Sat
urday or Sun
day when you
have a chance
to read this article the furor will have died
down. It’s been a week since Will Smith, the
6 foot 2 inch Black Male celebrity, struck
or slapped 5 foot 10 inch Chris Rock, also
a Black beloved celebrity, right in his face.
This occurred during the presentation of the
OSCARS program and as Chris said it was
“unforgettable television”. Frankly, I wish I
could forget.
Why do I mention that both Will
Smith and Chris Rock are Black male celebrities
well known to huge audiences across
America? Like all other attendees at the
ceremony, Smith and Rock wore fancy tuxedos
and the whole presentation was an attempt
to market the worthiness of the Black
People and the entertainment industry. This
particular OSCAR presentation was for the
first time produced by a Black producer, Will
Packer, who employed an all Black production
team all with promise that the show
So why do I emphasize the racial component.
Remember, I’m an old guy with
memories of times when Black people were
thought incapable of playing quarterback or
of being smart enough to be coaches or of
being admitted to prestigious colleges or of
being considered able enough to produce a
show like the OSCARS. Those times are not
far behind us and this 2022 Oscar presentation
was intended to increase viewership and
to demonstrate the abilities to the world of
people for whom those opportunities were
formerly foreclosed.
As I began watching the show
there appeared the Williams Sisters, Black
female athletes born anything but rich in
Compton and new world-famous, wealthy
and admired. There they were presented in
beautiful dresses with their boobies falling
out. Maybe the dresses were fashionable and
beautiful, I really didn’t notice. What I did
notice was their almost completely exposed
breasts and I was repelled. In these “Me Too”
times displaying women in this matter to the
ogling eyes of audiences plainly gives the
wrong message. Certainly if women wish to
dress this way certainly they have that right
I guess but to me it gives the wrong message.
Frankly, I am glad that prospective Justice
Ketanji Brown Jackson did not present herself
in that manner at her confirmation hearing
and I believe there is something off-kilter
DICK POLMAN
about Russian President Vladimir Putin baring
his chest to display his toxic-masculinity
which somehow makes him qualified to preside
over a nation or even he whole world.
(I hope Vice-President and potential future
President Kamila Harris agrees with me.)
Back to the Oscars. Do you think
Will Smith would have acted the same way if
the person telling the joke which arguably insulted
Will’s wife was a more powerful Black
Man, or a White Man, or a Black Woman, or
a White Woman? As far as I am concerned
Smith’s explanation that the innocuous joke
caused him to lose complete emotional control
is complete nonsense. There must be
other factors involved and I really don’t have
enough information to speculate. The fact
that Smith was simply allowed to resume his
seat and minutes later was allowed to receive
his Oscar to a standing ovation absolutely
disgusted me. To my mind the producers
of the show should have required that he be
immediately escorted out of the theatre as he
retook his seat.
There is an important racial element
to all this as has been expressed by my old
UCLA classmate Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
Kareem, an extraordinarily famous successful
Black Athlete, wrote a column saying
that Will Smith’s behavior “perpetuated
stereotypes against Black People advocating
violence, diminishing women, and insulting
the entertainment industry.” In his column
Abdul-Jabbar noted that Smith’s action will
allow pundits to push a narrative that “Black
People are more prone to violence and less
able to control their emotions.”
I would like to think that those stereotypes
no longer exist in the minds of
people, or at least younger people, but for
older people like Kareem and me it is still
necessary for Black people, and particularly
Black celebrities, to understand that their actions
contribute to the way an entire Race is
judged. Listening to the Brown Jackson confirmation
hearing I was especially moved by
her explanation of the importance of racial
modeling to young people. What are we
teaching our children when obviously wrong
behavior is ignored and everyone stands to
applaud the wrongdoer.
Sure, Chris Rock’s current tour in
Boston is sold out and he’s making lots of
money that he doesn’t need and that’s not
the point either. Meanwhile global warming
continues, the war in the Ukraine is unresolved,
there’s possibly a new threatening
virus variant but the public discourse seems
to center around whether Will should be
required to return his Oscar. What else is
there to talk about? Oh yes, gas prices are
real high!
HOW MUCH MORE EVIDENCE
DOES MERRICK GARLAND NEED
TO INDICT TRUMP?
If or when Merrick Garland bestirs himself to action, he’d do well to ponder
the new federal court ruling that drops the hammer on coup conspirator
John Eastman.
On Monday, the case for indicting Donald Trump was succinctly framed
and arguably wrapped in a bow. And this was without even knowing what Trump may have said
to fellow conspirators during seven key hours on Insurrection Day, the 7 hours and 37 minutes
that are mysteriously missing from the White House phone logs.
Seriously, folks. What is it gonna take?
First, some quick housekeeping: Eastman, you may recall, is the Better-Call-Saul lawyer who’s
been outed for concocting a “legal” memo that was designed to help Trump overturn his election
loss. Sort of a fascist instructional sheet for dummies.
Monday’s court ruling, authored by U.S. District Judge David Carter (a former decorated Marine),
commanded Eastman to cough up 101 emails – mostly exchanges with Trump – and to
share them with the House’s Jan. 6 Committee. That was the narrow issue at hand. But, fortunately,
Carter took it upon himself to connect the dots that situate Trump at the center of the
blessedly failed coup. Carter’s warning was an implicit plea for Merrick Garland to wake up:
“If Dr. Eastman and President Trump’s plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the
peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution. If the
country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible,
the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself.”
It would seem that our accountability sleuths at the Justice Department still need to be enlightened
about the evidence that shines with the strength of 100 suns. Whatcha got for us, Judge
Carter?
“Dr. Eastman and President Trump launched a campaign to overturn a democratic election,
an action unprecedented in American history…Their campaign was not confined to the ivory
tower – it was a coup in search of a legal theory. The plan spurred violent attacks on the seat of
our nation’s government, led to the deaths of several law enforcement officers, and deepened
public distrust in our political process.”
As Judge Carter reminds us, Eastman insisted in his Jan. 3, 2021 memo that Mike Pence, during
his ceremonial task of counting the Electoral College votes, could simply throw out seven
Biden states, thus reducing the tally to 232-222; and that Pence could then announce that since
no candidate had reached the magic 270, the election would decided by the House, where each
state would get one vote – and since the GOP at that time controlled 26 of the 50 state delegations,
presto! Trump would win the election.
The problem, of course, was that Pence had no power to toss Electoral College votes, because
there’s no such provision in the Constitution. But that mattered not a whit to Trump, who spent
days trying to muscle Pence into executing the plan that Eastman had touted as “BOLD.”
The judge zeroed in on one particular provision of the federal criminal code – 18 U.S.C. §
1512(c)(2) – which, as he explained, “criminalizes obstruction or attempted obstruction of an
official proceeding. It requires three elements: (1) the person obstructed, influenced or impeded,
or attempted to obstruct, influence or impede (2) an official proceeding of the United
States, and (3) did so corruptly.” He thus concluded:
“Because President Trump likely knew that the plan to disrupt the electoral count was wrongful,
his mindset exceeds the threshold for acting ‘corruptly.’…After filing and losing more than
60 suits (in court), this plan was a last-ditch attempt to secure the Presidency by any means.”
The potential hitch in all this evidence is that to prove Trump’s criminality to a jury beyond a
reasonable doubt, prosecutors need to successfully argue that Trump knew in his mind that
his coup conspiracy was wrong. Hence the potential problem: This mope doesn’t have a moral
compass. He tends to believe that whatever he wants or says at any given moment is right and
true.
For instance, one possible explanation for the seven-hour gap in the White House phone logs
is that Trump communicated with fellow conspirators by using burner phones. In a statement,
he denied doing that because, he insisted, “I have no idea what a burner phone is, to the best of
my knowledge I have never even heard the term.”
I’m sure he believes that lie in his mind. The problem is, he used the term “burner phones” at
least three times in his recent lawsuit against niece Mary Trump. And former national security
adviser John Bolton told CBS News, “Wait a minute, Trump knows burner phones.”
The Jan. 6 Committee members have been calling on the Justice Department “to do its job,”
but alas it’s possible that Garland is hesitating to indict Trump precisely because it’s so hard
to prove that someone so amoral has any consciousness of wrongdoing. Heck, just this week
Trump asked his 2016 campaign ally, war criminal Vladimir Putin, to release some dirt on
Hunter Biden.
I know, I know. Just like you, I’m rolling my eyes. Again.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|