9
THE WORLD AROUND US
Mountain Views News Saturday August 4, 2012
STUDENT-BUILT SATELLITES: A NEW WAY TO DO SPACE RESEARCH
Eleven tiny satellites called CubeSats will accompany a spy
satellite into Earth orbit on Aug. 2, inaugurating a new type
of inexpensive, modular nanosatellite designed to piggyback
aboard other NASA missions.
One of the eleven is CINEMA (CubeSat for Ions, Neutrals,
Electrons, & MAgnetic fields), an 8-pound, shoebox-size
package built over a period of three years by 45 students from
the University of California, Berkeley; Kyung Hee University in
Korea; Imperial College London; Inter-American University
of Puerto Rico; and University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez.
“This is a new way of doing space research, funded by
the National Science Foundation with launch arranged by
NASA,” said CINEMA principal investigator Robert Lin,
professor emeritus of physics and former director of UC
Berkeley’s Space Sciences Laboratory. “This is our first try,
but if everything works, we’re going to get a lot of good
science out of this.”
CINEMA will obtain images of the “ring current,” an
electrical current that encircles the Earth and which, during
large magnetic “space storms,” can blow out power grids on
the ground. By next year, CubeSat will be joined by three
identical satellites—two launched by Korea and another
NASA-launched CubeSat—that together will monitor the
3-dimensional structure of the ring current and warn of
dangerous activity.
CINEMA is one of five university-built CubeSats aboard the
Atlas V rocket; the other six are military or commercial. The
main payload is NROL-36, a classified satellite commissioned
by the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office.
NASA’s CubeSat Launch initiative provides an opportunity
for small satellite payloads to fly as auxiliary payloads
on previously planned missions. The nanosatellites are
made of cubes that are approximately four inches on a
side, have a volume of about one quart, weigh about two
pounds, and are meant to be grouped in twos or threes for
a particular satellite. CINEMA, for example, is comprised
of three cubes. Some two dozen CubeSats are built or
under construction at universities alone, and these 11 are
the first to go into orbit.
For three years, Lin has overseen the construction and
testing of CINEMA, aided by 25 UC Berkeley science and
engineering undergraduates and graduate students. For
two summers and winter vacations, some 10 students
from Korea came to UC Berkeley to assist, while 8 students
from Puerto Rico came to help with the engineering.
“There is more risk with these projects, because we use
off-the-shelf products, 90 percent of the work is done by
students, and the parts are not radiation-hard,” Lin said.
“But it is cheaper and has the latest hardware. I will be
very impressed if it lasts more than a year in orbit.”
The spacecraft carries a new instrument, STEIN, which
detects energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) to produce an
image of the high-energy charged particles in Earth’s
atmosphere, mostly ionized hydrogen and oxygen.
“It’s like astronomy, but using neutral particles instead of
light to create an image,” Lin said.
Lin and his UC Berkeley colleagues, including research
physicist Thomas Immel and grad student John Sample, will
communicate with CINEMA through the lab’s Mission
Operations Center and Ground Station, a radio dish in the
Berkeley hills.
you can contact Bob Eklund at: b.eklund@MtnViewsNews.
com.
Jerry Kim, a former student and systems engineer, holds
the CINEMA nanosatellite before it was packaged up and
sent to NASA in January 2012. Robert Sanders photo.
“A REALLY BIG SHOW!”
Have you been keeping up with the Olympics? It’s hard to avoid, being
splashed across headlines and continuously replayed on TV. Every angle
of the Olympics have been analyzed, from questions about indeterminate
gender to doping speculations. No doubt you’re sick of hearing about it.
It’s always challenging to find a new spin on an overused topic, but I like to
try. The only problem is --I don’t have a TV!
Of course, there’s plenty of Olympic information in newspapers and online. But reading
about it and looking at pictures just doesn’t provide the same level of understanding that
actual viewership does. Therefore, I’m coming at this article with limited knowledge of the
subject. (But then again; that’s never stopped me before!) So, here are my thoughts, for what
they’re worth, regarding the games going on across the pond.
It’s a mystery to me why some sports are greatly emphasized over others. Why are
swimming, diving, and gymnastics more enthralling than, say, sailing and table tennis?
In the winter Olympics, the media’s all about figure skating, while events like bobsledding
and “skeleton” (luge racing, but headfirst) are comparatively overlooked. Perhaps viewers
subconsciously gravitate toward sports in which the competitors are encased in spandex or
nearly naked. Like super heroes, these athletes portray the perfect human body. And they
accomplish physical feats the rest of us couldn’t dream of doing.
This brings up
another Olympic
observation: athletic
clothing.
When we look back
at photos from past
Olympic games, we
sometimes chuckle at
the incredibly dated
clothing. How is it that
something so basic as a
leotard can be made to
look like an explosion
of garish geometric
shapes? However,
the most unflattering
outfit, as I see it, is the
fencing getup.
Obviously, the
fencing uniform’s main
function is protection
rather than fashion. I
know nothing about
fashion, but I think the fencing outfit emphasizes all the wrong places (especially for women).
It’s bad enough that the face mask makes the wearer look like the monster from “The Fly”
with Vincent Price. (If you haven’t seen that movie, it’s your homework for the week!) But
these new electronic fandanglements rigged with wires running from the waist to the head
make them look like storm troopers with a helmet full of Christmas lights.
At least there are some sports that don’t require the players to dress too foolishly. Golf
comes to mind, although it’s not featured in these Olympics. Another nice thing about
golf is that you don’t have to have a body like a Greek god to play well. There’s something
refreshing about seeing a young, cute thing beaten to oblivion by a portly lady in her fifties.
But I digress. Hopefully next week will find me more knowledgeable. Maybe I’ll have a
chance to catch the games on TV at a restaurant or something. Until then, you enjoy them
for me! And rent “The Fly!”
YOU OUGHT TO KNOW BY
NOW!
These days one would need to be operating
on a super-sized dose of naïveté in order to
believe that one’s personal data and web habits
weren’t being tracked and catalogued on a
daily basis. Tracking cookies are the norm on
nearly all websites today and a quick review
of the tech headlines over the last year or so
would certainly make it clear that certain
unnamed social media giants have earned a
bit of a reputation for mishandling or over-
collecting users’ personal data. Beside the big
splashes that we hear about every so often
there are several other ways through which
online entities may be intruding on your
privacy.
At the top of the list is the federated group
of intelligence agencies that make up our national
security state. The very idea the government
agents may be reading your emails
and listening in on your calls sounds like
the stuff of late-night AM radio conspiracy
theories but saner minds claim that it’s not
only possible but that it’s been going on for
quite some time. Since the tragic events of
9/11 a major undertaking has been the construction
of a super-sized data center to sift
through the massive amounts of data traversing
our communications networks every
second of every day.
Government whistle-blowers have confirmed
that our homeland security offices
have been hard at work compiling dossiers
on nearly every US citizen or person within
our borders but good luck with getting any
kind of official confirmation on theses activities.
Needless to say it would be impossible
to “opt-out” of these types of data-collection
processes. For more information check out
the Electronic Freedom Foundation website
(https://eff.org) for details on the types of
activities our government may be up to and
what you can do about it. It also seems that
our wireless carriers have begun to get in on
the act.
One lucrative gig involves retrieving users’
locations on behalf of law enforcement, and
in many cases without warrants. In 2011
AT&T reportedly received $8.2 Million for
providing this service. Other big wireless
providers have found that using aggregated,
anonymous customer data gathered from
web surfing apps is a service that third-
parties can then use to target ads to specific
customers.
In order to opt-out of targeted advertising,
users must contact their service provider
and explicitly request that their data not be
provided to third-parties. Users who may be
concerned about being followed can stop using
location-based GPS apps on your phone.
Debt Collectors have found Facebook to be a
valuable source for tracking people who may
or may not be in debt and while this method
of collection may not be new to many apparently
some unlucky users are just beginning
to hear about it.
Horror stories abound of debt collectors who
not only stalk the debtor but harass family
and friends as well. In the physical world legislation
currently on the books govern the
ways in which collectors may contact debtors
but online the rules are a bit murkier. The
main thing one can do in this instance is to
adjust your privacy settings so that strangers
may not contact you.
Facebook has also made it quite clear that it
does not condone such behavior on its network
and advises users to contact the company,
the Federal Trade Commission and
the relevant Attorney General for the state in
question.
|