B2
THE WORLD AROUND US
Mountain Views-News Saturday, September 6, 2014
BIRTH OF FRENCH IMPRESSIONISM DATED BY TEXAS STATEÕS ÔCELESTIAL SLEUTHÕ
The Impressionist movement of the late 19th
century takes its name from French artist Claude
MonetÕs moody, dreamlike painting ÒImpression,
Soleil LevantÓ (ÒImpression, SunriseÓ). Now, Texas
State University astronomer and physics professor
Donald Olson has applied his distinctive brand
of celestial sleuthing to MonetÕs masterpiece,
uncovering new details about the paintingÕs origins
and resolving some long-standing controversies over
what the canvas depicts and when it was painted.
OlsonÕs findings are published by the MusŽe
Marmottan Monet of Paris, France, in ÒMonetÕs
ÔImpression SunriseÕ: The Biography of a Painting,Ó
the catalog of the museumÕs major Monet exhibition
running Sept. 18, 2014, to Jan. 18, 2015.
A ROOM WITH A VIEW
ÒFor several other Monet paintings from Le
Havre, we can be certain that the artist depicted
the topography of the port accurately,Ó Olson said.
ÒÕImpression, Soleil LevantÕ likewise appears to be
an accurate representation of a sparkling glitter path
extending across the waters of the harbor, beneath a
solar disk seen through the mist accompanying a late
fall or winter sunrise.Ó
Monet dated his signature with a Ò72Ó on the
painting, but some subsequent catalogs dismiss that
number and date the painting to 1873, assuming that
Monet had worked in Le Havre during the spring
of that year. The hazy nature of the image further
confused the issue, with various sources disagreeing
regarding the season of the year depicted and the
direction of MonetÕs view. Several influential art
historians even insisted that the canvas depicted a
sunset, not a sunrise. Monet himself helped to resolve
some of the uncertainty in an interview from 1898:
ÒI had submitted something done in Le Havre,
from my window, the Sun in the mist and a few masts
of ships in the foreground.... They asked me the title
for the catalog; it could not really pass for a view of Le
Havre, so I replied: ÔPut Impression.Õ From that came
ÔImpressionism,Õ and the jokes proliferated.Ó
Olson began his work by consulting 19th-
century maps and collecting more than 400
vintage photographs of Le Havre. One especially
clear and detailed photograph made it possible to
identify the precise hotel room from which Monet
worked. Olson confirmed the view from the room
to the southeast matched that of the painting and
subsequently calculated the SunÕs position over the
harborÑroughly 20 to 30 minutes after sunrise. To
further narrow the possible dates, Olson then looked
at the tides. Since the large sailing ships could only
enter and exit the shallow outer harbor during a few
hours near of high tide, he used computer algorithms
to calculate the tides of that era. The result was 19
possible dates in late January and mid-November of
1872 and 1873 when the Sun and tides corresponded
with the painting.
WHATÕS THE WEATHER LIKE?
Weather reports were the next clue in OlsonÕs
detective work.
ÒMeteorological observations allow us to reject
some of the proposed dates, because of the bad
weather common on the Normandy coast during
the late fall and winter months,Ó Olson explained.
ÒWeather archives also can identify some dates
when the sky conditions match the appearance in
ÔImpression, Soleil Levant.ÕÓ
Six dates remained after eliminating those with
stormy, rainy or windy weather and heavy seas. To
narrow the field even further, Olson examined the
smoke columns rising over the harbor on the left side
of the painting. The smoke appears to be blowing to
the right, which would indicate a wind from the east.
Two remaining dates record an east wind: Nov. 13,
1872, and Jan. 25, 1873.
An essay by art historian GŽraldine Lefebvre in
the exhibition catalog gives reasons for preferring
the year 1872Ñmatching the original date Ò72Ó
painted by Monet next to his signature on the
canvasÑand the combined analysis points to
Nov. 13, 1872, at 7:35 a.m. local mean time, as
the definitive date and time when Monet created
ÒImpression, Soleil Levant.Ó
You can contact Bob Eklund at: b.eklund@
MtnViewsNews.com.
COLLECTING RAIN WATER By Christopher Nyerges
I was driving along a beautiful street near Sierra Madre, with lined
with tall deodar trees and almost a rural feel to it. I was admiring the
beautiful houses and the well-kept gardens and trees, when I noticed it.
ÒItÓ was totally out of place, though it should be common, something
to find at every single home. Rain barrels!
The down-spout of the southwest corner of the house went into a
rain barrel. I pulled over to get a better look. This was a large plastic
barrel Ðthe type that IÕd seen used to import pickles into the United
States. The entire lid could be screwed off to gain access to the water.
The top had been modified with a screen to remove debris that came
down from the roof, and a spigot was added to the bottom so one
could easily use the collected rain water.
I had to see the rain barrel up close. I got out of my car and went up to the house, and met the owner
Carol Kampe who was working in her yard. She happily gave me a tour of her rain collection system.
It turned out that she had not one, but 10 rain-collecting barrels strategically located to collect the
most rain from the house
and garage roofs. Two of
the barrels were 65 gallons
each, and the other eight
were 60 gallons each.
The rain thus collected is
used for outdoor purposes
only Ð watering her fruit
trees and other plants in
the yard.
ÒGenerally, I have enough
rain water in my barrels to
last me until August,Ó says
Kampe. This means that
she is able to rely on the
rain for watering her yard
for approximately 2/3 of the
year. She estimates that she
saves perhaps $300 a month
in payments to the water
company.
ÒBut I donÕt do this for
economic reasons,Ó Kampe
adds. ÒI do it because we
live in a desert here in
Southern California. Water
will become more critical
as time goes on. So it is just
a shame to waste all this
good rain.Ó
Kampe has a common-
sense approach to her raain
harvesting, something that
is easy to do and is both
ecological and economical.
She was living in her
home just a few years and
then purchased seven of the
rain-collecting barrels. She
has since added three more.
The barrels were purchased
for about $100 each by a
company that modifies the
pickle barrels into rain-
collecting barrels. The company also provides hoses so that the barrels can be connected Òdaisy-chain,Ó
so that the overflow of one barrel fills other barrels.
Rain barrels are not light, and water weighs a little over 8 pounds a gallon. That means a 60 gallon
barrel full of rain water weighs in the neighborhood of 480 pounds. So when planning a rain collecting
system like this, one has to recognize that the full barrel is not going to be moved. Other barrels can be
connected to the barrel under the downspout so that the overflow can be collected in a spot away from
the house.
Also, Kampe is able to simply unscrew the lid of her rain barrels and scoop out water as needed for
individual plants.
Kampe laughed at all the current talk about Òliving greenÓ as if it were something new. ÒWe were
doing all this back in the 1970s,Ó she says, describing how they recycled and collected rain in Indiana.
Emphasizing the need to save and conserve water where you have a desert and an ever-increasing
population, Kampe echoes Santyana, pointing out that Òanyone who doesnÕt read history is doomed to
repeat it.Ó
She has all compact flourescent lights (CFL) in her home. CFLs last about five times as long as
conventional incandescent bulbs and use about one-quarter the energy. She also has light tubes which
direct sunlight into the house, which means she doesnÕt need to use electricity for lighting during the
day.
Kevin Sutherland of Pasadena examines the rain barrel
[Nyerges is the author of ÒSelf-Sufficient Home,Ó ÒExtreme Simplicity,Ó and other books. He is a
proponent of wilderness and urban self-reliant living who has been teaching classes since 1974. He can be
reached at Box 41834, Eagle Rock, CA 90041, or www.ChristopherNyerges.com.]
|