Opinion … Left/Right/Center | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain Views News, Pasadena Edition [Sierra Madre] Saturday, September 16, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
B3 OPINION Mountain Views News Saturday, September 16, 2017 DICK POLMAN Mountain Views News PUBLISHER/ EDITOR Susan Henderson PASADENA CITY EDITOR Dean Lee EAST VALLEY EDITOR Joan Schmidt BUSINESS EDITOR LaQuetta Shamblee PRODUCTION Richard Garcia SALES Patricia Colonello 626-355-2737 626-818-2698 WEBMASTER John Aveny DISTRIBUTION Kevin Barry CONTRIBUTORS Chris Leclerc Bob Eklund Howard Hays Paul Carpenter Kim Clymer-Kelley Christopher Nyerges Peter Dills Rich Johnson Merri Jill Finstrom Rev. James Snyder Dr. Tina Paul Katie Hopkins Deanne Davis Despina Arouzman Renee Quenell Marc Garlett Keely Toten AN IGNORANT AMERICA ENDANGERS DEMOCRACY Donald Trump famously declared, “I love the poorly educated!” and we know why. An electorate that’s ignorant about the basics of democracy is ideal grist for an authoritarian. I was reminded of that this week when I read the latest civics survey conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center. The stats speak for themselves. Only 26 percent of Americans can name all three branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial), and 33 percent can’t name any branch of government. Only 14 percent know that freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment, while 37 percent can’t name any of the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. This lamentable obliviousness has been tracked for years. In a 2010 survey, roughly 33 percent couldn’t even name the correct century of the American Revolution, and more people could identify Michael Jackson as the composer of “Billie Jean” than could identify the Bill of Rights as a list of constitutional amendments. In a 2015 survey, roughly half of college students at 55 top-ranked institutions didn’t know how long a senator serves (six years) or a congressman (two). There’s no empirical proof that Trump’s narrow path to victory was plowed by the poorly educated. After all, Barack Obama won twice with the same electorate. But someone with authoritarian instincts, once entrenched in power, is perfectly positioned to exploit civic ignorance. It’s easy to trample on democratic norms when so few Americans recognize and value the democratic norms. It’s easy for Trump to attack the integrity of judges when millions can’t even identify the judiciary as an independent branch of government. It’s easy for Trump to attack journalists as “enemies of the people” when millions are clueless about First Amendment press freedom. It’s easy for Trump to trample our history - he says that Andrew Jackson “was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War” (Jackson died 16 years before the Civil War) - when millions of Americans, according to the 2010 survey, couldn’t even say whether Revolution preceded or followed the Civil War. And it’s easy for Trump to attack immigrants when, according to the Annenberg Survey, 53 percent of Americans don’t know that even illegal immigrants have some constitutional rights. Due process, under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, has been guaranteed since the Supreme Court said so 131 years ago. Where does this ignorance originate? Two prominent educators, Richard Kahlenberg and Clifford Janey, recently nailed the biggest reason: “Public schools are failing at what the nation’s founders saw as education’s most basic purpose - preparing young people to be reflective citizens who would value liberty and democracy and resist the appeals of demagogues.” Basically, the public schools don’t teach civics anymore. Back in my day, at the risk of sounding ancient, we had “social studies,” which compelled us to know the three government branches, the basics of voting, and the democratic values embedded in the Constitution (plus, the correct century of the Revolution). We were even tasked with learning and naming all nine members of the U.S. Supreme Court. But as Kahlanberg and Janey point out: “The explicit civics curriculum has been downplayed in recent years. With the rise of economic globalization, educators have emphasized the importance of serving the needs of the private marketplace rather than of preparing citizens for American democracy. On one level, this approach made some sense. As the country celebrated two centuries of continuous democratic rule, the paramount threat seemed to be economic competition from abroad, not threats to democracy at home. “So the bipartisan education manta has been that education should prepare students to be ‘college-and-career ready,’ with no mention of becoming thoughtful democratic citizens. In a telling sign, in 2013, the governing board of the National Assessment for Educational Progress dropped fourth- and 12th-grade civics and American history as a tested subject in order to save money.” They argue that “rigorous courses in history, literature, and civics would cultivate knowledge of democratic practices and a belief in democratic values.” True enough. But even if school curricula were miraculously overhauled, we’re still left with the grim reality that several generations have already been lost. And we’re left with an electorate (or a huge slice thereof) that’s potential putty in the hands of a demagogue who knows as little as they do about constitutional norms. As James Madison, the father of the Constitution, wrote in 1822, “A popular Government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy, or perhaps both.” Both indeed. --------- Copyright 2017 Dick Polman, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia (newsworks.org/polman) and a “Writer in Residence” at the University of Pennsylvania. Email him at dickpolman7@gmail.com. Mountain Views News has been adjudicated as a newspaper of General Circulation for the County of Los Angeles in Court Case number GS004724: for the City of Sierra Madre; in Court Case GS005940 and for the City of Monrovia in Court Case No. GS006989 and is published every Saturday at 80 W. Sierra Madre Blvd., No. 327, Sierra Madre, California, 91024. All contents are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without the express written consent of the publisher. All rights reserved. All submissions to this newspaper become the property of the Mountain Views News and may be published in part or whole. Opinions and views expressed by the writers printed in this paper do not necessarily express the views and opinions of the publisher or staff of the Mountain Views News. Mountain Views News is wholly owned by Grace Lorraine Publications, and reserves the right to refuse publication of advertisements and other materials submitted for publication. Letters to the editor and correspondence should be sent to: Mountain Views News 80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Phone: 626-355-2737 Fax: 626-609-3285 email: mtnviewsnews@aol.com LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN/CENTER JOHN L. MICEK MAKING SENSE by MICHAEL REAGAN WHERE WAS THIS HILLARY LAST YEAR? There’s a line in Hillary Clinton’s new memoir of the 2016 campaign that may be among the most searingly honest utterances of her long career in public service: “I have come to terms with the fact that a lot of people — millions and millions of people — decided they just didn’t like me,” Clinton writes in the unimaginatively titled -- if perfectly appropriate -- “What Happened.” “Imagine what that feels like,” she concluded. Yeouch. That is tough to imagine. It’s a big enough hit to the ego if you’ve been left off the invite list for your office’s outing to Panera. Now imagine that not only does the entire country not want to go to lunch with you, they also prefer the loudmouthed boor who keeps inappropriately touching your leg under the table. That’s bound to leave a mark. Those bruised feelings are on display across the pages of Clinton’s memoir, as she heaps blame on former FBI Director James Comey; “the Russian intelligence apparatus;” opponents Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, and even, as MSNBC notes, the dark prince of Wikileaks, Julian Assange. Sanders, for instance, “didn’t get into the race to make sure a Democrat won the White House, he got in to disrupt the Democratic Party,” Clinton wrote, adding later, “ ... I am proud to be a Democrat and I wish Bernie were, too.” The Green Party’s Stein, who played the same spoiler role as Ralph Nader did in President Bill Clinton’s 1996 win over Bob Dole “wouldn’t be worth mentioning,” were it not for the fact that she prompted voter defections in such key states as Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Now-President Donald Trump narrowly won all three states - and with them -- the White House. Clinton is withering in her criticism of Trump, calling him the “the perfect Trojan horse” for Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. Her description of Trump’s notorious looming in the background during the second presidential debate will surely resonate with any woman who’s ever felt herself the object of unwanted male attention. “It was one of those moments where you wish you could hit pause and ask everyone watching, ‘Well, what would you do?’” she wrote. “Do you stay calm, keep smiling and carry on as if he weren’t repeatedly invading your space? Or do you turn, look him in the eye and say loudly and clearly, ‘Back up, you creep. Get away from me. I know you love to intimidate women, but you can’t intimidate me, so back up.’” As I’ve noted before, it takes Herculean self-confidence, rapacious ambition, bottomless vanity and not a little bit of self-delusion to convince yourself that you are equal to the task of governing the world’s greatest democracy. Clinton had all that during the perplexingly joyless trudge across the country that ended last November with her winning the battle (the popular vote), but not the war (the Electoral College). But the one thing she seemingly never had was a convincing narrative for why she, above all others, deserved the Oval Office. That her campaign went through more resets than a failing iPhone was testimony to that fact. Elsewhere, Clinton muses on why she was so disliked by a certain portion of the electorate: “What makes me such a lightning rod for fury? I’m really asking. I’m at a loss.” She correctly (and sadly) concludes, “I think it’s partly because I’m a woman.” In the end, many voters -- myself included -- channeled our instinct for self-preservation and went the “Not Trump” route, opting for Clinton’s stolid predictability and marked professionalism to the darkly nationalist rage and narcissistic instability that fired the Republican nominee’s candidacy. Unlike Trump, who seems to possess no capacity for introspection, Clinton at least has the presence of mind to recognize, ultimately, that her failure was her finally her own. “I go back over my own shortcomings and the mistakes we made. I take responsibility for all of them,” she wrote. “In my more introspective moments, I do recognize that my campaign in 2016 lacked the sense of urgency and passion that I remember from [Bill Clinton’s first campaign in 1992].” She also writes: “I go back over my own shortcomings and the mistakes we made. I take responsibility for all of them. You can blame the data, blame the message, blame anything you want—but I was the candidate.” It would have been nice to have seen more of this Hillary Clinton in 2016. With Donald Trump’s Washington hamhandedly lurching from crisis to crisis, one wonders how things might have turned out differently. —— © Copyright 2017 John L. Micek, distributed by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. An award-winning political journalist, Micek is the Opinion Editor and Political Columnist for PennLive/The Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pa. Readers may follow him on Twitter @ByJohnLMicek and email him at jmicek@pennlive.com. WHY NFL GAMES ARE UNWATCHABLE National Football League TV ratings down 13 percent in Week 1.” “NFL ratings in free fall.” Those headlines don’t surprise me one bit. But the NFL’s rapidly declining popularity has nothing to do with televising too many games a week, too many commercials, too much violence or too many mediocre teams. It has everything to do with politics – liberal politics. I’m a very political guy, in case you hadn’t noticed. But like most normal sports fans, I watch football on TV to relax, to enjoy myself. I love nothing better than to sit back on Saturday mornings and watch college teams play all day. Colleges still let you enjoy the game, but NFL games have become unwatchable. On Sunday, Monday and Thursday the first thing you see when you tune in to a pro game are players taking a knee during the “National Anthem” because of some political reason. I don’t give a damn what the quarterback, the head coach or the owner of the team thinks or tweets about politics, the president or the Steven King movie “It.” All I care is, “Are you going to win or lose? Can you pass, catch the ball or coach? Will the game be a good one?” You wonder why so many people are so angry about politics these days? It’s because they can’t get away from it – not even for three hours on a Sunday afternoon for a dumb football game. I watch sports to take a break and to get as far away as I can from the 24/7 political news cycle that dominates our daily lives. But the NFL and ESPN – which is laying off people because its ratings also are plummeting -- have made it impossible to take a respite from politics. ESPN on-air staffers like Jemele Hill think it’s OK to go on a rant accusing President Trump of being a white supremacist. ESPN’s liberal bosses should have canned her the way they canned conservative Curt Schilling a few years ago for saying politically incorrect things like Islamist extremists were like Nazis. But they’ve accepted Hill’s apology and, despite her previous political rantings, still employ her. ESPN’s owners are especially stupid to allow Hill to keep her job, since her attack on Trump offended millions of their viewers in Flyover Country who voted for him. If it keeps practicing this kind of political bias, ESPN is liable to find itself being challenged by the FSN – the Fox Sports Network. But I wouldn’t like it any better if I turned on “Monday Night Football” and heard Al Michaels and his sidekick Steve Bannon railing about crybaby Hillary Clinton and how awful her new book of excuses is. If I want politics, I can watch “Hannity,” listen to Rush or tune in to one of the liberal Trump-bashing Sunday shows like “Meet the Press.” The NFL should keep political posturing or messaging of every kind out of its games. It’s up to team owners to pull up their jock straps and put an end to pre-game kneel- downs and protests before it gets out of control. The owners need to tell their protesting stars and scrubs that, yes, you have a First Amendment right to kneel or sit during the “Anthem” if you want. But they should add that if a player wants to make a political statement on game day, as owners they also have the right to make them sit out the rest of the season. ——- Copyright ©2017 Michael Reagan. Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political consultant, and the author of “The New Reagan Revolution” (St. Martin’s Press). He is the founder of the email service reagan.com and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his websites at www.reagan.com and www.michaelereagan.com. Send comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com. Follow @reaganworld on Twitter. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For info on using columns contact Sales at sales@cagle.com. Mountain Views News Mission Statement The traditions of community news- papers and the concerns of our readers are this newspaper’s top priorities. We support a prosperous community of well- informed citizens. We hold in high regard the values of the exceptional quality of life in our community, including the magnificence of our natural resources. Integrity will be our guide. Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com | ||||||||||||||||||||