OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, December 18, 2021
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
OPINION Mountain View News Saturday, December 18, 2021
11
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
MOUNTAIN
VIEWS
NEWS
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
PASADENA CITY
EDITOR
Dean Lee
PRODUCTION
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
DISTRIBUTION
Peter Lamendola
CONTRIBUTORS
Stuart Tolchin
Audrey SwansonMeghan MalooleyMary Lou CaldwellKevin McGuire
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard HaysPaul CarpenterKim Clymer-KelleyChristopher NyergesPeter Dills
Rich Johnson
Lori Ann Harris
Rev. James SnyderKatie HopkinsDeanne Davis
Despina ArouzmanJeff Brown
Marc Garlett
Keely TotenDan Golden
Rebecca WrightHail Hamilton
Joan Schmidt
LaQuetta Shamblee
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated asa newspaper of GeneralCirculation for the County
of Los Angeles in CourtCase number GS004724:
for the City of SierraMadre; in Court CaseGS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in CourtCase No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra MadreBlvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not bereproduced without the
express written consent ofthe publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper becomethe property of the Mountain
Views News and maybe published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views expressed
by the writersprinted in this paper donot necessarily expressthe views and opinionsof the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by GraceLorraine Publications,
and reserves the right torefuse publication of advertisements
and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
A member of
the
California
NewspaperPublishers
Association
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens. We
hold in high regard the
values of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, includingthe magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our guide.
STUART TOLCHIN
PUT THE LIGHTS ON
THINKING IS NOT ENOUGH BUT IT’S
A GOOD START
Basically I have no reason to leave the house because I
don’t have to DO anything. I start the day with Democracy
Now on PBS at 7 a.m. every weekday morning. The show
describes, often accompanied by terrifying videos, the cur
rent horrors of the world. Also included are presentations
by individuals who have done their best, and are still doing
their best, to combat these horrors. I watch every morning
and even tape it so that I can re-watch it. The host of the
show is Amy Goodman, whose maternal grandfather was an
Orthodox Rabbi while she was raised by secular parents and
graduated from Radcliffe College. In 1991 she was badly beaten by Indonesian soldiers
after witnessing a mass killing of peaceful demonstrators. I was not beaten, maybe spat
upon a few times, but I still identify a bit with Amy.
The content of the show and the background of Amy contribute to my maintenance
of a certain attitude about myself. I am proud of being a Jewish person, a secular
Jewish person, with no religious belief or religious education or much knowledge of Jewish
traditions but who firmly believes in authentic Jewish principles. These principles
are fairness, equality, and compassion for the oppressed. I like knowing that an elitist
education at Radcliffe (now Harvard) and an orthodox grandfather are not necessarily impediments
to engaging heroically with the present horrors of today’s world. Democracy
Now guarantees that I remain aware but it is accompanied by a strong dissatisfaction with
myself.
I still want to help the world but have lost my way. As an attorney representing
mainly indigent and politically persecuted people I tried to do my best. But now I am retired
and am rarely out in the world. My wife takes loving care of me, prepares our meals,
washes our clothes, and uses technology to shop for our food and to pay our bills. She
even presses the right keys so that my weekly articles are sent to the editor of this paper. I
bemoan the fact that I don’t do anything and she says “so learn”; but I don’t. So why not?
Like Lady Gaga was “I born this way?” After all I was raised in a home with mothers and
grandmothers who told me not to touch anything. I never went to the refrigerator myself
and never thought of saying that that I wanted to pick out my own clothes or that I had
much preference for anything. I never had any particular ambition as far as professions
were concerned and I went to College because my friends did. I went to Law School because
I didn’t want to get drafted—that was one thing I knew. My present inaction and
indecision leaves me feeling dissatisfied with myself. Probably this feeling is intensified by
watching Democracy Now. Maybe that’s what I like best is this continual dissatisfaction
with myself. It is familiar and comfortable and does not require that I do anything else.
Well, I spend a lot of time thinking, mainly about myself, I guess. Notwithstanding
my internal disapproval I still manage to quite like myself. Without comparing myself to
others I think I am okay. Forgetting infants and toddlers I am one of my favorite people.
I know there is a kind of unforgiveable privilege and complacency associated with this
overall picture and, as typical of me, I do think about it. I wonder what else I should be
doing. It is not my desire to be beaten by soldiers as Amy Goodman was. But I know that
there is more that I should and want to be doing. I keep writing but writing isn’t enough.
Let’s think about that because that’s probably all that I will do. Remember the Hippocratic
Oath (not hypocratic—but sometimes you wonder) First: Do No Harm. Right now I’m
just trying for honesty and believing my curiosity and continuing to talk with all kinds of
people and carefully listening will help me to find the right track. Strangely today, in these
impossible times, I am continually delighted by my experience of existence. Being alive is
pretty great and beatings are not required.
Happy Holidays
DICK POLMAN
NOW RAND PAUL IS IN FAVOR
OF BIG GOVERNMENT
Rand Paul has long been a laughable lightweight – at Senate
hearings, Dr. Fauci beats him up on a regular basis – but now
he has outperformed even himself.
Republicans like him always equate “big government” with
“socialism” and routinely condemn it as a matter of principle –
until catastrophe hits their own backyard, and then suddenly,
without even a scintilla of embarrassment, they dump their doltish boilerplate
and plead for big government socialist money to rescue them.
Look, the tornado victims in Kentucky deserve all the help that Joe Biden can
possibly provide, and he’s already doing it. But we can still take a moment to
laugh ourselves silly at the letter Paul sent to the president over the weekend,
where be begged for federal assistance and asked Biden to “move expeditiously to
approve the appropriate resources for our state.”
Isn’t it amazing how all the idiot talk about the evils of “socialism” gets blown
away as soon as killer weather ( the “new normal,” thanks to climate change)
comes calling?
If memory serves, Paul is the purportedly principled “libertarian” who voted in
2013 not to send billions in federal relief aid to the New Jersey victims of Hurricane
Sandy, who voted in 2017 not to send billions in federal relief to the Texas
victims of Hurricane Harvey, who voted in 2017 not to send federal relief money
to the Puerto Rico victims of Hurricane Maria, and who voted in 2019 not to appropriate
billions in new relief money to several federal agencies.
As he once explained, “This (relief spending) has to stop. We spend too much.
We owe too much. We cannot keep spending money we do not have.”
But now that his state has been hit hard, he wants to spend as much as possible
with all expeditious speed. In the past he always insisted that if the feds wanted to
hike disaster spending, they should offset those costs by cutting the budget somewhere
else. But lo and behold, you can read the entire letter that Paul sent to the
president, and not once is there any insistence that Kentucky should be helped
only if the federal budget is cut elsewhere.
No amount of air freshener can erase the stench of his hypocrisy.
Actually, that’s standard Republican behavior. Mick Mulvaney, the Trump budget
director, was a congressman who voted in 2013 not to send money to New
Jersey, insisting that Sandy relief should happen only if budget cuts were made
elsewhere. But in 2015, when his state of South Carolina was flooded by a killer
storm, he pleaded for federal money without first insisting on other budget cuts:
“There will be a time for a discussion about aid and how to pay for it, but that
time is not now.”
The state’s senior senator, Lindsey Graham, did the same thing. He’d voted No on
the Sandy package, but suddenly, after his flood, he declared: “Rather than put a
price tag on it, let’s just get through this, and whatever it costs, it costs.”
There’s much more. Tom Cotton, the Arkansas senator, voted No on the Sandy
package, but pleaded for expeditious federal money a few years later after Arkansas
was hit by floods. Four House Republicans from Colorado voted No on the
Sandy package, but a pleaded for socialist help a few months later when Colorado
was hit by floods. In 2011, the two Republican senators from Oklahoma voted
No on the Sandy package and in 2011 they tried to cut the Federal Emergency
Management Agency budget – only to pull a miracle switcheroo in 2013 when
Oklahoma was hit by tornadoes.
One of those senators, Tom Coburn, told his constituents: “As the ranking member
of the committee that oversees FEMA, I can assure Oklahomans that any and
all available aid will be delivered without delay.”
So Rand Paul is merely one rotten egg in the basket of deplorables. Nevertheless,
he was still a committed scrooge as recently as last month. When Biden’s
infrastructure package reached the Senate floor – with its $47 billion outlay to
combat climate change; with its $6.8 billion for FEMA – Paul again voted No.
How fortunate for his benighted citizens of Kentucky that he was powerless to
stop its historic passage.
And how fortunate Kentuckians are that Paul’s hypocrisy has been trumped
by Biden’s sense of responsibility. The president has already approved massive
federal relief aid with all deliberate speed – without fuming that the state’s red
electorate had voted against him, without ranting that the state’s two red senators
were horrible people or whatever, without offering to throw paper towels, without
telling Kentuckians that maybe the tornadoes would’ve never happened if they’d
bothered to rake their forests.
That’s called governing.
Dick Polman, a veteran national political columnist based in Philadelphia and a
Writer in Residence at the University of Pennsylvania
RICH JOHNSON NOW THAT’S RICH
POLITICALLY CORRECT SANTA
‘Twas the night before Christmas and Santa’s a
wreck…
How to live in a world that’s politically correct.
His workers no longer would answer to “Elves,”
Vertically challenged” they were calling themselves.
And labor conditions at the north poleWere alleged by the union to stifle the soul
Four reindeer had vanished without much proprietyReleased to the wilds by the Humane Society.
And equal employment had made it quite clearThat Santa had better not use just reindeer.
So Dancer and Donner, Comet and Cupid,
We’re replaced with 4 pigs and you know that looked stupid!
The runners had been removed from his sleigh;
The ruts were termed dangerous by the E.P.A.
And people had started to call for the copsWhen they heard sled noises on their roof-topsSecond-hand smoke from his pipe had his workers quite frightened.
His fur trimmed red suit was called “Unenlightened.”
And to show you the strangeness of life’s ebbs and flows,
Rudolph was suing over unauthorized use of his noseAnd had gone on Geraldo, in front of the nation,
Demanding millions in overdue compensation.
So, half of the reindeer were gone; and his wife,
Who suddenly said she’d enough of this life,
Joined a self-help group, packed, and left in a whiz,
Demanding from now on her title was Ms.
And as for the gifts, why, he’d ne’er had a notion
That making a choice could cause such commotion.
Nothing that clamored or made lots of noise.
Nothing for just girls. Or just for the boys.
Nothing that claimed to be gender specific.
Nothing that’s warlike or non-pacific.
No candy or sweets…they were bad for the tooth.
Nothing that seemed to embellish a truth.
And fairy tales, while not yet forbidden,
We’re like Ken and Barbie, better off hidden.
For they raised the hackles of those psychologicalWho claimed the only good gift was one ecological.
No baseball, no football...someone could get hurt;
Besides, playing sports exposed kids to dirt.
Dolls were said to be sexist, and should be passe';
And Nintendo would rot your entire brain away.
So Santa just stood there, disheveled, perplexed;
He just could not figure out what to do next.
He tried to be merry, tried to be gay,
But you've got to be careful with that word today.
His sack was quite empty, limp to the ground;
Nothing fully acceptable was there to be found.
Something special was needed, a gift that he mightGive to all without angering the left or the right.
A gift that would satisfy, with no indecision,
Each group of people, every religion;
Every ethnicity, every hue, Everyone, everywhere...even you.
So here is that gift, it's price beyond worth...
"May you and your loved ones enjoy peace on earth."
(c) Harvey Ehrlich, 1992
Notice: This poem is copyright 1992 by Harvey Ehrlich. It is free to distribute, without changes,
as long as this notice remains intact. All follow-ups, requests, comments, questions, distribution
rights, etc should be made to mduhan@husc.harvard.edu. Happy Holidays!
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285
Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|