12
OPINION
Mountain Views News Saturday, November 6, 2010
STUART Tolchin..........On LIFE
My Turn
HAIL Hamilton
Mountain Views
News
Publisher/ Editor
Susan Henderson
City Editor
Dean Lee
Sales
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
Art Director
Allison Kirkham
Production Assistant
Richard Garcia
Photography
Jacqueline Truong
Lina Johnson
Contributors
Teresa Baxter
Pat Birdsall
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Stuart Tolchin
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Chris Bertrand
Mary Carney
La Quetta Shamblee
Glenn Lambdin
Greg Wellborn
Ralph McKnight
Trish Collins
Pat Ostrye
Editorial Cartoonist
Ann Cleaves
Webmaster
John Aveny
Two years
ago (October
31, 2008)
I wrote an
article entitled
‘Maybe It’s All
For The Good?’ In the article
which came out right before
the Presidential election, I
had the temerity to suggest
that all the hardships facing
the country might in the long
run be considered a benefit. I
suggested that these hardships
might convince the electorate
to vote against a continuation of
the unbelievable incompetence,
arrogance, and ignorance
which characterized the Bush
Administration. Furthermore,
I speculated that with the
election of a qualified individual
as President, America might
awaken from its slumber
and realize that change was
necessary and that all of us
would have to become more
aware of the consequences to
our own actions.
Well its two years later and
Americans have voted again.
In much of the country voters
have chosen, at least according
to my view, to return to those
halcyon days of incompetence,
arrogance, and ignorance.
Sarah Palin- endorsed
candidates have been elected
throughout much of the United
States. These newly elected
legislators certainly must be
seen as a protest against present
policies. I think it is undisputed
that today’s results demonstrate
that Americans did not like
the bail out programs which
seemed to help the rich and
ignore the needs of everybody
else. Americans feel that too
much money is being spent and
too little is being accomplished.
Probably, most Americans feel
that President Obama’s focus on
passing a Health Care Bill was
untimely in that more attention
should have been focused on
the economy and the creation
of jobs.
Certainly there has been an
unprecedented expression of
displeasure with incumbents
and control of the House
of Representatives is now
in the hands of the dreaded
Republicans while the
Democratic majority in the
Senate has drastically dwindled.
Guess what; I think the election
results may well portend a
positive future for this Country.
First, as my wife continues to
stress, the Republican majority
in the House may well be a
good thing. Republicans will
no longer be able to content
themselves with the opposition
to every Democratic backed
bill. The Republicans in the
House may actually have to try
and pass some legislation and
to do that they will be forced to
try and cooperate with the still
Democratic controlled Senate.
You must remember that old
term “cooperation”. Maybe we
will see its return. After all both
parties must recognize that in
today’s world there is no such
thing as party loyalty.
All right; let’s analyze these
results. Let’s look at California
where a new kid has been
elected Governor. Well, at least
he was a new kid Governor
almost 40 years ago. If the
electorate wanted a new face,
a genuine political outsider,
good old Governor Moonbeam
would not have had a chance.
He was elected not just because
his opponent was seen to act
dishonorably towards her
housekeeper but, according to
exit polls, his election resulted
from voter confidence based
on his experience. No more
Schwarzenegger fantasies,
Californians now recognize
that it is necessary to elect
someone who knows what he
is doing. Look at the California
results. Barbara Boxer, a
hard-working liberal (that’s
right LIBERAL) Senator re-
elected. Propositions backed
by tremendous amounts of oil
money (out of State Oil Money
at that) was insufficient to fool
the voters. GREAT NEWS-
money will not necessarily
determine the outcome of
elections. Of course, California
is a progressive State but not
so progressive that it does not
frequently elect Republican
Governors. No, I think the
California election results
are predictive of the national
election results in 2012. Voters
will awaken and no longer allow
themselves to be fooled by the
vague and mainly substanceless
statements of Tea Party-like
candidates. Even in the State of
Nevada, extremely hard-hit by
economic woes, voters had the
sense to re-elect Senate majority
Leader Harry Reid whose
efforts were largely responsible
for the passage of the dreaded
Health Care Act.
All right, so far there’s nothing
in this article that’s particularly
revelatory. Here’s one final
prediction, Sarah Palin is going
to disappear from the political
scene before the next election.
Why? Because it will become
clear to almost everyone that
she is in this thing all for herself.
She quit being Governor
because she didn’t want to do
the work and wanted to make
scads of money. Well she’s done
that. She’s famous now but she
reminds me of Kato Kaelin.
She will disappear but might
achieve her ambition to become
a talk-show host despite the fact
that she has almost nothing to
say.
Well, the next two years will
be interesting. Perhaps we’ll
see an attempt at impeachment
or attempts at overturning the
Health Care Bill- but I doubt it.
I predict that America is going
to start working (that means
jobs) again. We’ll see.
California’s ‘Economic
State of Emergency’
IS IT ALL FOR THE BEST?
Democratic governor Jerry Brown
must act quickly and decisively
when he takes office in January
or California’s "economic state of
emergency" will get even worse
because state government shows no signs of becoming less
hostile toward business and because more companies are leaving
in droves to relocate elsewhere--taking tens of thousands of
good paying jobs with them.
The exodus of jobs and capital has reached such an alarming
point that California ought to declare a “state of economic
emergency” just as we have emergencies resulting from floods,
fires and earthquakes. Raising taxes or creating new regulations
should be out of the question.
Unless there is a reduction in the hostility California directs
toward businesses, we will see more commercial enterprises
calling site selection companies for help in finding friendlier
states in which to locate.
Joseph Vranich, the Business Relocation Coach, has compiled
a list of 129 companies which have left or “de-invested” in
California due to its hostile tax, environmental and business
climate. Joe keeps track of this information as best he can
through published data. Conveniently, the state of California
keeps no such records.
In addition, Vranich reports that 25% of California’s
manufacturing jobs have left between 1990 and 2007.
With California’s regional unemployment rate at 12.5% to 30%,
the Golden State is now the Golden Parachute State. California
is hemorrhaging jobs, despite $85 billion of federal stimulus
dollars being pumped into the state. California’s Republican
governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has morphed, in 8 years, into
a tap-dancing Obama marionette, and is being accused of being
oddly disconnected from the economic pain which surrounds
him.
California’s new year of 2010 got the gong in January when
Northrop Grumman announced it will move its headquarters
and several hundred well-paying jobs to Washington D.C.
from Los Angeles. Southern California, where the aerospace
industry was born, suddenly has not one single, major military
contractor.
And this is just the beginning of the business exodus from
California this year.
Governor Schwarzenegger, who has recently been groveling
before President Obama for more federal funds, says the federal
stimulus funds California has received since 2009 have saved
150,000 jobs in the state since last year.
Yet, unemployment has continued to rise during that time.
The state auditor of California begs to differ with the governor’s
numbers. Elaine Howle reported in December 2009 that three
major state agencies actually have misstated or made up their
numbers.
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation claimed that
it saved 18,229 jobs with $1.08 billion in stimulus money, even
though the department had issued layoff notices for just 6,962
corrections employees.
The California State University system said it saved 26,156
jobs – half its entire work force – with $268.5 million in federal
stimulus money. Caltrans reported it saved or preserved 1,590
jobs -spending $26.7 million. Howle says the jobs numbers
were overstated by at least 56%.
While 20,000 workers from the New United Motor
Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI), the automobile manufacturing
plant in Fremont, California get ready to go on unemployment,
Governor Schwarzenegger was blithely breaking ground on one
of the largest federal stimulus fund projects in the country on
Wednesday.
The project would be laughable if so many people weren’t losing
jobs in other parts of the state. The project is a $230 million “fish
freeway” near Red Bluff, California which will allow salmon to
safely reach their breeding grounds, while dam water is being
pumped to farm fields. Half the money will be federal stimulus
funds, the rest of the project will be paid by Californians who
already have a $21 billion state budget deficit.
How many NUMMI jobs could have been saved with $230
million? Why would a “fish freeway” be more important than
people? This is yet another example of how environmental
wackos drive the Obama administration and this state over the
financial cliff.
While the Republican governor of California toadies to a
Democratic president for “freebies” from a bankrupt federal
government, China is wooing the best and brightest technologies
of the highly-desirable “green” industries and stealing thousands
of jobs from the state. Did Governor Schwarzenegger even
notice?
Let’s hope Governor Brown will notice and stop the burgeoning
loss of jobs by creating a business-friendly environment that will
encourage new jobs and new technologies to stay in California.
The time for words is past; the time for action is now!
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the
County of Los Angeles
in Court Case number
GS004724: for the City
of Sierra Madre; in Court
Case GS005940 and for
the City of Monrovia in
Court Case No. GS006989
and is published every
Saturday at 55 W. Sierra
Madre Blvd., No. 302,
Sierra Madre, California,
91024. All contents are
copyrighted and may not
be reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the
Mountain Views News and
may be published in part
or whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do not
necessarily express the views
and opinions of the publisher
or staff of the Mountain
Views News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should be
sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327
Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
RICH Johnson
Ahh, Stuart, Stuart, Stuart!
I got an advance copy of
Stuart’s article entitled, “Is
It All For the Best?”
That Stuart. His column
in this week’s paper
includes such phrasing as
“Dreaded Republicans”.
Also “Unbelievable
incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance
which characterized the Bush Administration.”
“California…not so progressive that it does not
frequently elect Republican Governors.” He
compares Sarah Palin to Kato Kaelin (who you
may remember was the do-nothing guy who
lived in O.J. Simpson’s guest house during the
murder of Nicole.)
How can someone, especially one with a
superior intelligence, compare Sarah Palin to
Kato Kaelin? Silly me, I would have thought
getting elected governor of a state and being
selected from amongst 300 million people to be
a vice presidential running mate would show
that Ms. Palin had to have had something on the
ball. But according to Stuart, “…she has almost
nothing to say.”
Actually Stuart’s wife Irene displayed keen
insight when she pointed out that Republicans,
now wielding greater power, will have to try and
make Congress work. Republicans in power may
actually help President Obama in his bid for re-
election. If the next two years don’t bode well
there will be another gang on the block to share
the blame.
There is pretty liberal use of the word
“obstructionist” leveled against Republicans over
the last few years as they threw up roadblocks to
certain pieces of legislation. Does “obstructionist”
only apply to Republicans? I wonder…will
anyone call Congressional Democrats or
President Obama an “obstructionist” if they
stifle or veto legislation pushed through by a
Republican dominated congress?
Were there Democrat obstructionists during
the Bush years? Did Democrats (as well as
Republicans) block meaningful immigration
reform? Did Senator Tom Daschle hold up
judicial confirmations? Remember when,
in 2005, Senator John McCain tried to alert
the country to serious problems with Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. He and 3 other Senate
Republicans sponsored the Federal Housing
Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005.
Designed to reign in and exercise more control
over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this bill
would have gone a long way to spare us from
the mortgage meltdown. Were Democrat Senate
Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd and
Democrat House Financial Services Committee
Chairman Barney Frank obstructionists as they
killed any chance of this bill from becoming law?
Many know my big pet peeve is what I consider
a double standard. We are told the Bush years
were filled with rife arrogance. Yet the first two
years of the Obama presidency were ubiquitous
with secretive back room dealings that excluded
elected representatives who just happened to
be elephants and not donkeys. Sounds awfully
doggone arrogant to me.
I don’t know. What do you think?
What DO You Think?
We’d like to hear from you!
Contact us at:
editor@mtnviewsnews.com
or
www.facebook.com/mountainviewsnews
Mountain Views
News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
the community
newspaper and
the concerns of
our readers are
this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence
of our natural
resources. Integrity
will be our guide.
|