PACK STATION (from pg. 1)
I had so many questions about
the pack station’s current status
and future outlook and her
answers were very encouraging;
Q: “So Deb, being a corporate
business consultant, how and
when did you get involved in such
an unusual project as owning and
operating Adams‘ Pack Station?”
A: “My mother, Sue Burgess and I
owned a cabin in Big Santa Anita
Canyon, and we depended on the
pack station to haul our supplies.
When it became clear that the
previous owner was struggling to
maintain the facility, we decided
to do whatever we could to
keep it going. My mother, Rich
Conforti and I went in together
and purchased the pack station on
April fools‘ day of 2006, and went
right to work on it.”
Q: “You have done a remarkable
job of fixing the place up and I see
you’ve added lots of animals. How
many animals do you currently
have for hauling, and what kind
are they?”
A: “We have 1 mule and 9 donkeys.
The mule and 8 of the donkeys are
pack able and the other donkey is
only a year old, so she is too young
to pack, but she goes along with
the string to learn.”
Q: “Where do get your mules and
donkeys?”
A: “Most of them are adopted from
the Bureau of Land Management.
They capture them from the wild.”
Q: How often do you pack supplies,
and who are your most frequent
clients?
A: “We pack every Friday, through
the main canyon and up to Spruce
Grove where there are cabins, and
continue on, ending at Sturtevant
Camp. Sturtevant Camp used to
be our most frequent destination
when it was more active. Saturdays
are reserved for packing to Winter
Creek and First Water, but we have
few requests for packing to those
areas.”
Q: “You also have goats and
chickens at the pack station. Do
they serve a practical purpose or
are they just for pleasure?”
A: “The goats were donated and
we thought we could use them for
packing to remote areas for fire
clearance, but as it turns out, they
are the wrong kind of goat. They
are too small with large rumens, so
they are just for us and our guests
to enjoy. The chickens were also
donated. They lay a few eggs, and
bring plenty of pleasure to our
visitors. The children love the goats
and chickens, so it makes visiting
us a lot more fun for them.”
Q: “What type of materials do you
typically pack?”
A: “The most common item we
pack is propane, but we have
hauled all kinds of other goods
as well such as food, beverages,
lumber, chairs, beds, refrigerators,
mattresses, cement and lots of
trash coming out.”
Q: “When is your store open, and
what type of supplies and goodies
do you sell?”
A: “We are open Friday through
Sunday 8:00 to 5:00 and we sell a
wide variety of cold beverages, beer,
candy and chips. On Saturdays and
Sundays we also serve hamburgers,
veggie burgers, hot dogs, hot links,
fries and coffee and on the third
weekend of the month, we serve
dutch-oven cooked pulled pork
sandwiches and veggie sausage
sandwiches. We also sell National
Forest Adventure Passes, walking
sticks, books, maps and t-shirts.
Q: ”And I understand you also
have live music at the pack station
periodically. Tell me a little about
that.”
A: ”Yes, on the 3rd Sunday of each
month we have a concert followed
by open mic. We have had some
excellent talent here. There is no
admission fee, and we draw quite
a crowd hikers, cabin dwellers
picnickers and campers. All are
welcome, young and old!
Q: “You mentioned that this is not
a money making venture. It must
take a lot of work & money to keep
this place in such great condition.
The animals are healthy, the barn,
house and outbuildings are clean
and well maintained. How do you
do it?
A: “It is a team effort. Rich and my
son Jason and I spend a lot of time
here and we have volunteers who
help with the animals, packing and
maintaining the property. We have
had the support of many friends
along the way, but we always need
more help.”
Q: “What can interested
individuals do to help ensure the
livelihood of the pack station?”
A: “We could use more help with
corral and barn maintenance. We
also need to do fire clearance.
Donations are always welcome
to our non-profit, Friends of
the San Gabriels. We use thesefunds to help with trail work, and
support bringing disadvantaged
kids into the canyon.
As I was leaving the pack station,
the sun was going down and the
hawks were soaring above when I
heard another beautiful brassy bray
fill the air, and I thought how lucky
we are to have this hidden treasure
of Sierra Madre right here on our
back door step, and I hope we can
keep it there forever.
PEOPLE (cont. from pg. 3)
It does not take much to figure out
who that arsonist is and to see why it
is that they have not been stopped....
as the old wisdom goes, “follow the
money”. If you do, you will easily see
that it is the corporations of this world
that are responsible for the majority
of the problem, from selling us all our
consumptive lifestyle and keeping us
distracted in our pursuit of it, to their
total disregard for anything but the
bottom line, to their grossly reckless
abuse of the environment, to their total
control over our representatives we
have entrusted protect our best interests
and have empowered to do what is
best for the people of this country.
Our power as citizens has dwindled
to the point where we have little input
into our government, a government
that was designed at its inception as a
government “of the people, by the people,
and for the people”.
What is it that has taken our power
away? The fact that over the last
century and a half, our government has
redefined what constitutes a person. It
has given corporations the same rights
as people.
They then redefined speech, so that
now money equals speech. So who now
has the loudest voice?...those with the
most money....and who has the most
money and the power to keep it that
way?... the corporations of this country.
How do we change that? We must
stand up on a grassroots level and take
personhood and our government away
from corporations and put it back in the
hands of “we the people”. Throughout
our nation there are hundreds of
communities that have revised their
local charters or passed ordinances
that state that within their boundaries,
corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE. Many
of these communities have gone a step
further and recognized the rights of the
natural environment, guaranteeing it
the right to exist and to be unharmed.
A group of over 100 townships in
Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and
Maine have joined together to form an
alliance of townships that have taken
personhood away from corporations
and have granted nature the right to
exist unharmed and have taken back
the power to govern themselves. So
too have entire countries changed their
constitutions to redirect their priorities.
Both Bolivia and Ecuador have
rewritten their constitutions to give
nature the right to exist and flourish. A
true democracy such as our founding
fathers intended and prescribed in
our constitution, was to be run by us
and it is time for us to take our power
back before we are stripped of our
personhood .
Sierra Madre has always been a free
thinking and independent minded
town. Our community has always had
a voice and our people have been a
strong and guiding force. It is time for
us to step forward and help to lead the
rest of the nation’s cities to being as
empowered as we have had the fortune
to be in this town. Let us amend our
charter or pass an ordinance to take
personhood away from corporations
within our boundaries and to preserve
and support our natural environment
and our citizen’s personhood that we so
dearly value in Sierra Madre. If anyone
is interested in pursuing this with me,
please feel free to get in touch.
To see what others have done, check
out the following websites.
http://www.sustainlv.org/index.
cfm?organization_id=11§ion_
id=2147&page_id=9030 (PA)
http://yestolocalrights.org/?page_
id=101 (Shasta, CA)
4
AROUND SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
Mountain Views News Saturday, June 25, 2011
By Lori Abbott
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Please, leave
the trees: that's what conservation
groups who've filed a lawsuit against the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are saying
about a policy that requires all trees
and shrubs be removed from California
levees. The federal policy aims to improve
flood safety by removing vegetation
that the Corps maintains weakens
the levees.
However, Kelly Cattlett, California representative
for Defenders of Wildlife,
says there's clear evidence that the levee
trees, which represent the last 5 percent
of riparian habitat in California, are vital
to endangered wildlife.
"It provides habitat for species; it stops
erosion, so it actually strengthens the
levees with the roots of the vegetation;
and the overhang provides shade,
which cools the water, which is good for
aquatic species."
The policy was put in place after Hurricane
Katrina devastated the Gulf of
Mexico coast.
Cattlett says California's needs are different,
and contends a "one-size-fits-all"
policy doesn't work.
"It's clear that this is a very ill-thought-
out policy change. And when they did
it, it seemed to be a knee-jerk reaction
to what occurred in Louisiana during
Hurricane Katrina."
There are other critics of the federal
policy. The California Department of
Water Resources has said removing the
levee trees will cost billions of dollars
that would be better spent on projects
to make levees stronger. Cattlett agrees.
"In order to comply with the policy, levee
owners are going to have to divert
limited funds that they have already allocated
to do things like strengthen their
levees and prevent under-seepage."
The Corps maintains that trees can blow
down during storms and take parts of
the levee with them, and that the roots
may provide a path for water to seep
through the levees.
The lawsuit filed on Monday alleges
the federal policy is illegal because the
Corps hasn't prepared an environmental
impact study or consulted with federal
wildlife agencies.
More information is at www.defenders.
org
LAWSUIT CHALLENGES FEDERAL POLICY TO
REMOVE TREES FROM CALIFORNIA LEVEES
NUCLEAR
NEIGHBORS:
POPULATION
SOARS NEAR
US REACTORS
Map of census data shows a
17 percent increase in residents
within 10 miles in a
decade
http://www.msnbc.msn.
com/id/42555888/ns/
us_news-life/
Who's afraid of nuclear
power? Not the American
people, judging by where
they choose to live.
A new map of data from
the 2010 U.S. Census shows
that the number of people
living within the 10-mile
emergency planning zones
around nuclear power plants
rose by 17 percent in the
past decade, compared with
an overall increase of less
than 10 percent in the U.S.
population.
If the circles on the map are
widened to a 50-mile radius
(the same evacuation area
that U.S. nuclear officials
recommended for Americans
living near Japan's
troubled Fukushima Dai-
ichi reactors), they would
cover one in three people in
the U.S. That's 116 million
nuclear neighbors, up from
109 million a decade earlier,
according to the analysis
conducted for msnbc.com
by Longcreative, a data analysis
and design company.
The population within 10
miles of Pennsylvania's
Three Mile Island reactor
grew 11 percent. At Pilgrim,
outside of Boston, the increase
was 41 percent. Near
San Onofre on the California
fault lines, 50 percent.
Among the 100 most populous
cities on the new census
map, 26 have a nuclear plant
within 50 miles: New York,
Chicago, Philadelphia (3 different
plants nearby), Phoenix,
San Diego, Fort Worth,
Charlotte (2 plants), Detroit,
Baltimore, Boston (2 plants),
Washington, Virginia Beach
and Norfolk, Omaha, Raleigh
and Durham, Miami,
Cleveland, Minneapolis and
St. Paul (2 plants), New Orleans,
Pittsburgh, Toledo
(2 plants), Newark, Baton
Rouge, and Rochester, N.Y.
|