OPINION
B5
Mountain Views News Saturday, June 15, 2013
STUART Tolchin..........On LIFE
OUT TO PASTOR
A Weekly Religion Column by Rev. James Snyder
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
SENIOR COMMUNITY
EDITOR
Pat Birdsall
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Stuart Tolchin
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Chris Bertrand
Ron Carter
Rev. James Snyder
Bobby Eldridge
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Wellborn
Dr. John Talevich
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Jasmine Kelsey Williams
THE TIMES THEY ARE
ACHANGING EVEN ME
CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW UNCLE SAM?
You can imagine my
feelings when I recently
found out that
good old Uncle Sam
was checking up on
my phone calls, email messages and the rest
of the social networking. Finally, somebody is
really watching out for me.
It is more than that. Somebody is so interested
in my affairs they are getting involved in my
telephone conversations. I must admit that at
first I was a little suspicious about all of this.
For example. What does Uncle Sam know
about me and my phone calls that I do not
know?
I get an awful lot of telephone calls during the
course of a week. Some are friends, some are
family, some are trying to sell me the Brooklyn
Bridge. Even if I lived in New York City, I
would not want to own the Brooklyn Bridge.
Can you imagine how much it cost to keep
that thing up and running?
As I said, at first I was a little suspicious about
somebody listening into my phone calls. Then
I remembered that back in "the day," everybody
did that. We had what was called the
"party line" telephone system. That meant that
everybody was connected to everybody else.
My grandmother for example, lived in a valley
up in the mountains. She was on the party line,
of course, and everybody had a special ring.
Grandma's ring was two long and one short
rings. Whenever the telephone rang, dear old
grandmother knew who was being called and,
being a nosy person, she usually listened into
the conversations. I am not picking on my
grandmother, for everybody did it. Everybody
knew everybody was doing it.
It was gossiper's heaven.
I think there is something to be said for everybody
knowing everybody's business. That way
everybody is up and up on the things they are
talking about.
Of course, there is a dark side to it. I am semi-
ashamed to reveal that I was part of that dark
side.
Whenever anybody wanted to send out a rumor
there was always the party line telephone
system. My cousin and I got together and
cooked up some juicy rumor about old Henry
up the valley. Henry had never been married
and was probably in his 70s at the time.
We started the rumor that Henry had a
girlfriend.
It did not take long for everybody in the valley
to know that Henry, who had been a bachelor
for over seventy years, now had a special love
interest. The big question coming through the
party line was, who is this lucky woman?
Before long, this got a little out of control.
Everybody believed that Henry had a special
love interest and it got to the point that Henry
himself believed he had a love interest.
I remember going with my grandmother to
the grocery store and we happened to run into
good old Henry. My grandmother, who was
the queen of the gossipers, took this opportunity
to speak to Henry.
"Oh Henry," she said as we approached him. "I
heard the news that you have a girlfriend. I'm
so happy for you. You'll have to bring her over
to my house for coffee and cake some time."
"Thank you, Mary," Henry said with the biggest
smile I have ever seen him wear. "I've
never been happier."
At this point, I did not know what to do. Everybody
was so happy with this rumor, especially
old Henry, that the truth would have
destroyed the entire valley. I did think of starting
a rumor that Henry and his new girlfriend
had a fight and broke up. However, on second
thought, Henry was so happy these days, I just
hated to spoil his life.
I never knew how that turned out. The last
time I saw Henry he was smiling and thanking
people for congratulating him on having
a girlfriend. Some people need to feel happy,
I suppose.
I guess it is my time to be fooled by my uncle,
and I deserve it.
I really do not mind if good old Uncle Sam
is going to listen in on my social networking
"party line," but I do have a few rules that I
would like to establish.
Rule number one. Uncle Sam do not repeat
anything you hear said on my "party line."
Let's keep some of that stuff between us.
Okay? Some of what you're going to hear may
not be altogether, what should I say, truthful.
Especially, if you only hear a portion of the
conversation.
Rule number two. If while listening in on the
conversation of mine and the other party happens
to be some salesman trying to sell me
something, please feel free to butt into the
conversation. After all, the salesman is trying
to take a dollar out of my pocket and you
know how much you want that dollar!
Rule number three. If the conversation you
overhear is concerning you, keep in mind
we're talking about the "other" Uncle Sam.
It is hard to keep anything secret these days. In
fact, there is not much to keep secret anymore.
The only secret I'm really interested in is what
God has. His promise to me is, "Call unto me,
and I will answer thee, and shew thee great
and mighty things, which thou knowest not"
(Jeremiah 33:3 KJV).
God hears me all the time and knows everything
about me.
As I’ve been
writing now for
quite a while I’m
quite depressed
about the state
of the world and
its seemingly insoluble problems. I
haven’t had much of an idea of what
I can do to be of help and I’ve felt like
I’m sinking along with everyone and
everything else. This negative attitude
came out on Saturday when I was at
a family get-together honoring my
cousin’s seventy-eighth birthday. It’s
rare that I see my cousin and this was
a chance to see her and her son and
his family. Included in that family are
two kids, 17 and 11 and I like to talk to
the kids as a way of taking the future’s
temperature.
So I got into this conversation with
this seventeen-year old and his father
and frankly, I was horrified at what I
heard. First a little background. The
seventeen year old, who is without
question a really bright kid, told me
that he was graduating with mainly
D’s. He explained that most of what
went on in School was just a waste
of time and he seemed quite proud
that he had not bought into that
nonsense. He said that he had used
his time in other productive ways
and had acquired skills in art, music,
and technological understanding. As
to his future plans, his parents had
agreed to allow him to remain at home
for only thirty days after graduation
unless he agreed to search for a job or
enroll in Community College.
Okay; ready now to hear his plans.
He was not going to go to College
or Trade School. He was not going
to look for work nor did he plan to
travel and stay with friends. What he
plans to do is move on to some land
that somebody’s father owns and live
there with a bunch of his anonymous
friends known only over the internet.
Once on the land, he and his as yet
unknown cohorts plan to establish
a self-sufficient culture living off the
grid, planting and growing and, I
guess, eating their own food. He has
no Driver’s License and does not plan
to own a car or very much else, but
tells me that there is this vast network
of people that are doing the same
thing and that they will change the
world.
So how do you think I responded?
I got crazy and told him he was
arrogant and stupid. I told him that
he was not the first person to have
such ideas and that his plans or lack
of plans was just crazy. In the middle
of my rant he stopped me and asked
why I was so angry; why it seemed like
I wanted him to fail. I told him that
my parents and grandparents were
also his relatives. I explained to him
that they had lived through pogroms
and swam across frozen rivers and
walked across Poland and worked in
sweatshops (most of this was true) so
that their descendants, Him, could
live better lives. He was willing, even
eager, to throw away all the privileges
that their struggles had earned for
him and to go somewhere to dig in
the dirt. He asked me if I didn’t think
that these unknown ancestors of his
would not be proud that perhaps, as
the results of their efforts, he was now
free of the restrictions that faced them
and could now go out and try and live
a better life and create a better world.
I just laughed.
On Sunday, still angry, I went to
the post Office and picked up a copy
of the Mountain Views News. First I
looked to see if my column was in the
paper as it has been for the past 289
consecutive weeks. There it was, and I
felt that satisfaction that I had actually
accomplished something. What it is
that I think my column accomplishes
I really don’t know; but I imagine
that by managing to write the weekly
article, and being as honest as I can
be, I am doing something to make
the world a better place and that feels
good.
After looking at my column I
thumbed through the rest of the paper.
On page 5 I noticed Christopher
Nygeres; column about homesteading
in the City. His column led me to
google sustainable living communities
and Permaculture. I am now much
better informed about what my young
cousin was talking about. He is not
alone and perhaps, with the help
of the Internet, people will come
together and create something new
and wonderful. Check this stuff out.
Who knows; the internet has already
helped to foment revolutions.
We humans, like my Russian
relatives, my young cousin, and Chris,
and you and me are really special.
Our most precious skill is the ability
to adapt to changing conditions. Let’s
see if it works this time.
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 55 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 302, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
HOWARD Hays As I See It
“Anyone who says they
remember what happened
at Woodstock wasn’t really
there.”
- anonymous
I look forward to
Greg Welborn’s column,
because he always gives me
something to look into. Last week, he quoted
Bill Clinton as having said, “Obama doesn’t
know how to be president. He doesn’t know
how the world works. He’s incompetent. He’s
an amateur!”
The quote, it turns out, originated in a
book on President Obama by Edward Klein
that came out a year ago, “The Amateur”.
Klein alleges Clinton offered this assessment
during a heated discussion with his wife,
the Secretary of State, urging her to quit the
administration and challenge Obama in the
2012 Democratic primaries – strange advice
coming from one regarded as a political
genius. Klein’s source remains unnamed,
with no corroboration. Seven years earlier,
Klein came out with “The Truth About
Hillary”, in which he asserted Chelsea
Clinton was conceived through marital rape,
and wrote at great length about the younger
Hillary Rodham’s deficient personal hygiene.
The above Woodstock quote came to mind
when news broke of the NSA’s acquiring the
totality of Verizon’s phone logs. As I listened
to those claiming the program has helped foil
terrorist plots, and others claiming with equal
certitude it hasn’t, it seemed those you’d find
publicly expounding on the inner-workings
of our most secretive intelligence-gathering
operations would be those who were never
really there.
Some on the left bemoan that President
Obama is continuing the abuses suffered
under President Bush. Shortly after 9/11,
Bush secretly authorized the NSA to
eavesdrop on Americans in the United
States – without warrant. Previously, such
activities had been conducted by the FBI –
with a warrant. According to the NY Times,
under this program 500 conversations were
being listened-in on at any given time. The
FBI’s activities expanded to digging into
library lending records and internet use, and
monitoring the activities of peaceful antiwar
groups.
In 1994, the Supreme Court rejected the
administration’s argument it could imprison
indefinitely anyone it labeled “enemy
combatant”, without access to the courts. The
Times quotes an internal memo from John
Yoo, the Justice Dept. lawyer who argued for
torture, “the government may be justified
in taking measures which in less troubled
conditions could be seen as infringements of
individual liberties.”
The ACLU took the administration to court,
and Judge Anna Taylor ruled, “It was never
the intent of the Framers to give the President
such unfettered control, particularly where
his actions blatantly disregard the parameters
clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights.”
The ruling was overturned on appeal, on
the grounds that since none of the plaintiffs
could show they’d been wiretapped by the
NSA themselves, none had standing to sue.
Bush later claimed that although he abided
by Congress’ mandate that no domestic
eavesdropping occur without approval from
the FISA court, as a “wartime president”
he retained authority to order on his own
whatever domestic spying he pleased. Bush
insisted ultimate authority rested with the
president; President Obama upholds that
ultimate authority rests with Congress, the
Courts, and the Constitution.
Eric Snowden, the NSA/Verizon leaker,
claimed, “I had full access to the full rosters
of everyone working at the NSA, the entire
intelligence community, and undercover
assets all around the world. . . I, sitting at my
desk, certainly have the authorities to wiretap
anyone — from you or your accountant, to a
federal judge, to even the President.”
I envisioned some Master-of-The-Universe
figure; someone with a career advancing
unseen through the ranks of our intelligence
community to achieve such awesome power.
He turns out to be a 29-year-old high school
drop-out, who’d been on the job three
months, enjoying the good life in Hawaii with
a live-in girlfriend described as an “acrobatic
pole dancer”. (To assure the thoroughness
of my research, I checked out her video on
YouTube.)
Mr. Snowden’s position was not with
our government, but with a private
contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton. The Bush
Administration turned an unprecedented
amount of our nation’s defense over to profit-
making corporations; from supplying our
troops to guarding our embassies to torturing
our prisoners. Our intelligence operations
were relegated to those committed not to our
national interest, but the interests of their
shareholders.
Though it seems extraordinary someone
like Eric Snowden held such access, a report
from the Director of National Intelligence
states that, as of 2012, 483,263 employees
of private contractors held the same “Top
Secret” clearance as Mr. Snowden’s. Once
given, such clearance is hard to take away
– reviewed only once every five years. The
NY Times reports that, according to the
company’s own securities filing, half of Booz
Allen’s 25,000 employees hold top secret
clearances, with “access to information that
would cause ‘exceptionally grave damage’ to
national security if disclosed to the public”.
One of more than a thousand private
contractors employed by our intelligence
community, Booz Allen was paid $1.3
billion for its work over the past fiscal year.
Such work doesn’t come cheap. According
to a 2007 report by the Senate Intelligence
Committee, the work of a $126,500-a-year
government intelligence analyst costs us
$250,000 with a private contractor. The
Project on Government Oversight testified
before the Senate Homeland Security
Committee that intelligence work costs 83%
more when contracted out. Early in the Bush
Administration, a consortium was formed
including Booz Allen, SAIC and Northrup
Grumman to enact project Trailblazer,
privatizing the analysis of signals intelligence
coming over the internet. The project was
scrubbed in 2005 after blowing through $5
billion in taxpayer money and producing no
actionable intelligence.
There’s also the government/corporate
“revolving door”. Director of National
Intelligence James Clapper is a former Booz
Allen executive. The DNI under President
Bush, John McConnell, works for the
company now.
In response to the leaks, President Obama
stated, “I welcome this debate, and I think
it’s healthy for our democracy.” This should
be about whether our interests in protecting
our security and values as a nation should be
relegated to those whose primary interest is
in making a buck.
PROVIDING PLAN B IS
A BAD PLAN
Messages count in our culture, especially when it comes to
children. What we communicate to them in both words and deeds
impacts how they see the world and how they participate in it. This
week, the Obama administration chose to send a very destructive
message to young girls by siding with a district court which ruled
that the “Plan B” morning after pill must be made available to all
females irrespective of their age.
We’ll skip the lengthy criticism about this president’s hypocrisy and lack of integrity
on the issue, but suffice it to say that candidate Obama was clear in his opposition to
allowing “a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old going into a drugstore to buy medication
that potentially, if not used properly, could end up having an adverse effect”. Instead,
let’s focus on the broader issue here: the messaging that’s being directed at our youth.
Anyone who’s been a parent knows that from their earliest ages children are
sponges. Whether it’s the toddler who follows our every move or the argumentative
teenager who is quick to pounce on any perceived hypocrisy in his parents, they’re
always watching and learning – picking up the cues as to what really is expected of
them.
When we tell a teenager who is still under age that he or she can get a condom at
school, we’re not promoting “safe sex”; we’re encouraging them to have sex. When
we tell a young girl that she can now walk into any pharmacy and purchase a pill
powerful enough to prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterine wall (the
morning after pill), we’re telling them there need be no consequences to the very
adult act in which they’ve just engaged. When we forbid that same child from buying
cough syrup without their parent’s permission, we’re telling them we don’t trust them
to make a simple decision. When we give grown men and women the right to remain
on their parent’s medical insurance until well into their maturity, we’re discouraging
them from growing up or taking responsibility for their own way in the world.
The messaging in each of these is the same. There is no reason to grow up, take
responsibility for your own life or make decisions wisely. We’re one step (maybe even
several steps) closer to eliminating the need for parenting by the parents at all. We’re
telling them the all-powerful state will take care of them, remove the consequences
of irresponsibility and force their neighbors to take care of them well beyond any
reasonable measure of true poverty.
What’s so surprising is that we’re actually surprised that the generations seem
more narcissistic than previous generations, that they seem to be drifting more in
life, trying to “find themselves”, that they are postponing until much later in life the
normal markers of maturity, responsibility and community participation. We’re
treating them like immature idiots and surprised that they then act that way.
I personally know too many young college graduates who bemoan the fact that
they don’t know what they want to do with their life. This is a fantasy of wealth and
privilege. I’m not referring to the wealthiest among us. I’m referring to a whole
generation which, en masse, has grown up with more wealth and privilege than any
other nation’s youth or any other generation in history. 50 years ago, 100 years ago,
200 years ago young adults didn’t have to care about what they wanted to do with
their life. They had to care about feeding, clothing and housing themselves. They
had to get on with the job of becoming productive members of their community.
This was a good thing, and it built many fine communities. In fact, it built a nation.
The most critical function in any society is to raise up future members who will
be productive members and enable that society to continue for another generation.
There was true self esteem in meeting that responsibility head on and doing a job
well – whether it was milking cows or working in a factory. You didn’t have to find
yourself, because you had never lost yourself in the first place.
Today, we’re coddling our youth and morally eviscerating them. We’re messaging
that they don’t have to grow up, and then we’re surprised to find they’re unhappy,
unfulfilled and unproductive. We really shouldn’t be. After all, they’re doing exactly
what we told them to do.
About the author: Gregory J. Welborn is a freelance writer and has spoken to several
civic and religious organizations on cultural and moral issues. He lives in the Los
Angeles area with his wife and 3 children and is active in the community. He can be
reached gregwelborn2@gmail.com
GREG Welborn
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions
of community
newspapers and
the concerns of
our readers are
this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
|