THE WORLD AROUND US
B2
Mountain Views-News Saturday, November 15, 2014
TOUCHDOWN! ROSETTA’S PHILAE PROBE LANDS ON COMET
On Nov. 12, ESA’s Rosetta mission made history by
soft-landing its Philae probe on a comet, the first
time such an extraordinary feat has been achieved.
After a tense wait during the seven-hour
descent to the surface of Comet 67P/Churyumov-
Gerasimenko, the signal confirming the successful
touchdown arrived on Earth at 16:03 GMT (8:03
a.m. PST).
“Our ambitious Rosetta mission has secured a
place in the history books: not only is it the first
to rendezvous with and orbit a comet, but it is
now also the first to deliver a lander to a comet’s
surface,” noted Jean-Jacques Dordain, ESA’s
Director General.
Rosetta was launched on 2 March 2004 and
travelled 6.4 billion kilometers through the solar
system before arriving at the comet on 6 August
2014.
The landing site, named Agilkia and located on
the head of the bizarre double-lobed object, was
chosen just six weeks after arrival based on images
and data collected at distances of 30-100 km from
the comet. Those first images soon revealed the
comet as a world littered with boulders, towering
cliffs and daunting precipices and pits, with jets of
gas and dust streaming from the surface.
During its seven-hour descent, which was
made without propulsion or guidance, Philae
took images and recorded information about the
comet’s environment.
Touchdown was planned to take place at a speed
of around 1 m/s, with the three-legged landing gear
absorbing the impact to prevent rebound, and an
ice screw in each foot driving into the surface.
But during the final health checks of the lander
before separation, a problem was detected with
the small thruster on top that was designed to
counteract the recoil of the harpoons to push the
lander down onto the surface. The conditions of
landing—including whether or not the thruster
performed—along with the exact location of Philae
on the comet, are being analyzed.
Over the first 2.5 days after its landing, Philae
will conduct its primary science mission, assuming
that its main battery remains in good health. An
extended science phase using the rechargeable
secondary battery may be possible, assuming Sun
illumination conditions allow and dust settling on
the solar panels does not prevent it. This extended
phase could last until March 2015, after which
conditions inside the lander are expected to be too
hot for (due to the comet’s approach to the Sun) it to
continue operating.
Science highlights from the primary phase will
include a full panoramic view of the landing site,
including a section in 3D, high-resolution images
of the surface immediately underneath the lander,
on-the-spot analysis of the composition of the
comet’s surface materials, and a drill that will take
samples from a depth of 23 cm and feed them to an
onboard laboratory for analysis.
The lander will also measure the electrical
and mechanical characteristics of the surface.
In addition, low-frequency radio signals will be
beamed between Philae and the orbiter through the
nucleus to probe the internal structure.
Next year, as the comet grows more active,
Rosetta will need to step further back and fly
unbound ‘orbits’, but dipping in briefly with daring
flybys, some of which will bring it within just 8 km
of the comet center.
The comet will reach its closest distance to the
Sun on 13 August 2015 at about 185 million km,
roughly between the orbits of Earth and Mars.
Rosetta will follow it throughout the remainder of
2015, as they head away from the Sun and activity
begins to subside.
You can contact Bob Eklund at: b.eklund@
MtnViewsNews.com.
LIFE WITH BEARS, COYOTES, MOUNTAIN LIONS
AND OTHER WILDLIFE
THE DISAPPOINTMENT OF “MAN VS. WILD”
By Christopher Nyerges
Remember to act responsibly when in bear
territory and in the San Gabriel Valley, with
this year’s drought especially, we are in Bear
Country. Our wildlife is suffering from the
lack of rain and are searching relentlessly for
food and water.
Because bears are attracted to anything
edible or smelly, their search often leads them
more frequently into our neighborhoods,
where trash and food is readily available.
Local police departments and the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife are
receiving more and more calls when bears
come down into the community and
rummage through trash bins. These bears
are often labeled “nuisance” bears, but
in reality they are just doing what comes
naturally to them, foraging for food.
Tips for Bear-Proofing Your Home:
Bears have keen noses and can smell an easy
meal from miles away. To avoid unwanted
visitors searching for food;
• Purchase and properly use a bear-proof garbage container. Athens Services has them available.
• Wait to put trash out until the morning of collection day.
• Don’t leave trash, groceries, or animal feed in your car.
• Keep garbage cans clean and deodorize them with bleach or ammonia.
• Keep barbecue grills clean and stored in a garage or shed when not in use.
• Make bird feeders inaccessible to bears.
• Don’t leave any scented products outside, even non-food items such as suntan lotion, insect repellent,
soap or candles.
• Keep doors and windows closed and
locked.
• Harvest fruit off trees as soon as it is ripe,
and promptly collect fruit that falls.
• Securely block access to potential
hibernation sites such as crawl spaces under
decks and buildings.
For the first time, I
watched an episode of
“Man vs. Wild” with Bear
Grylls. Yes, I have heard
about it for years, and
yes, I have seen young
teenagers drooling over
their Bear Grylls’ knives,
and yes, I even saw Mr. Grylls doing some
silly act on the Jay Leno Show. But I had never
watched the “Man vs. Wild” show.
I expected some great lessons on survival,
and relevant topics on how to protect myself and
my family from the many threats within and
without. I expected entertainment also; I mean,
it’s television after all. But I naturally assumed
that with all the popularity of this show, it would
have something useful, interesting, relevant,
and imminently valuable to share. Boy was I
wrong!
During the one episode I watched, I don’t
think I saw any useful survival skill that I would
ever be in a position to employ. In fact, most
of it would be categorized as what NOT to do!
Furthermore, there was no sense of purpose or
reason to what the man was doing. OK, he was
dressed a bit too neat and clean and he was on
this quest for water in the desert.
He jumps into a deep rocky hole looking
for water. Really? A “survival expert” would
never have jumped into such a chasm in this
dangerous manner since a real expert could
have seen there was no water in there merely by
looking. But you do get to see him scramble out
of the hole. OK, so he has athletic abilities, but
not the wisdom to demonstrate what not to do.
He then dug a little hole in a dry stream,
which is indeed a spot where you’d find water.
I have done just that many times and dug deep
enough to where water would seep in, clarify
on its own, and then I could drink it. But Mr.
Grylls, instead, proceeded to pack wet sand into
the sock he just took off his foot and squeeze
the sock to get out a few drips of water. Really?
Again, a real expert would not do that, and
the bad thing about the show is that someone
will leave thinking that is a bonafide survival
skill. He’s appealing to the lowest common
denominator of thrills and grossness but he
didn’t show real useful skills, and he could have,
and he should have.
Folks, it only got worse.
Next, he is purportedly wandering along
and found some debris in the desert. Looks
like some hang-glider crashed here, he tells us.
Really? All the gear was relatively new – not
worn out and weather worn like you’d expect to
find in the desert. And lo and behold, he found
just the right amount of debris to rig together a
little three wheel cart and then the old parachute
was used so the wind could pull him along. Very
ingenious yes, but the debris was most certainly
planted there, and the likelihood of anyone ever
actually fashioning such a vehicle from found
objects is so remote as to be laughable. In fact, I
began to ask my friend if the show was intended
to be comedy.
There were numerous dangerous maneuvers
when one could have taken a safe route. He
chooses to whirl around edges of a mountain
on his supposedly-found parachute cord, rather
than just hike the safe and sure way around. He
squeezes through holes in rock when he could
have safely gone around. And he quickly makes
a bundle bow to shoot a rock tied to a string to a
distant hill so he could hang on the rope to get
to the distant mountain. Really? He would have
done far better simply by tossing the rock. But
most of the purported skills seem faked. I could
not help but wonder how many naive teenage
boys will die when they try to duplicate what the
“survival expert” on TV did.
And part of my point is, there was no
point! Grylls chooses danger when there are
obviously many safe ways. You survive not by
taking ridiculous and unnecessary risks, but
by thinking your way through a situation and
choosing the wisest route. This was bad TV, bad
advice, there was no real drama and no point
to Mr. Grylls’ wanderings. Is the show really
popular? If Mr.Grylls is really the expert he is
made out to be, why does he allow himself to be
paid to demonstrate the antithesis of “survival”?
Before we turned off the pointless show,
my viewing companion and I watched as Mr.
Grylls took two aluminum tubes and purported
to make a fire piston. He stuck a little bit of
some sort of tinder in one end, and hit one
tube of aluminum into another and magically
produced a glowing ember. Folks, that was as
phony as they come. If any of you have tried to
get an ember with a fire piston, you know that
everything has to be “just-so,” and even then
it will be very difficult. This was just one more
staged aspect of a phony show that is not even
good entertainment.
We turned off the TV and found it far more
enlightening and enriching to discuss Paul
Campbell’s latest book on the Universal Tool
Kit.
And what of the hour or so I spent watching
Bear Grylls? Well, as Alan Halcon likes to say,
that’s an hour of my life I’ll never get back.
[Nyerges is the author of “How to Survive
Anywhere” and 9 other books. He has
taught practical survival skills and wild food
identification to ordinary folks since 1974. He can
be reached at www.ChristopherNyerges.com.]
Keeping Coyotes Away, Too!
Take the same precautions as for bears.
Coyotes eat practically everything and
are attracted to places where they can
find easy pickings of fruit, or trash.
They also eat small animals so please be
careful.
Don’t keep pet food outdoors
|