Mountain Views News     Logo: MVNews     Saturday, February 15, 2014

MVNews this week:  Page 23

23PUBLIC NOTICES Mountain Views News Saturday, February 15, 2014 23PUBLIC NOTICES Mountain Views News Saturday, February 15, 2014 
City of Sierra Madre 

ORDINANCE NO. 1350 


AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 611 E. SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD 
FROM R-1-15 TO CIV, AND REVISE THE ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY, AND AMEND CHAPTER 17.18 OF TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. 

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: 

WHEREAS, the current zoning for the City-owned property at 611 E. Sierra Madre Boulevard (Assessor Parcel Number 5766-005-903) thus R-1-15, is inconsistent with 

the current civic uses on the property; 

WHEREAS, the current R-1-15 zoning allows development of single-family dwellings, and the CIV zone allows civic uses which are consistent with the current uses on 

the property; 

WHEREAS, the General Plan designates the land for the property as “Municipal Government”, which allows for public institutional, civic and governmental agency and 
service uses; the rezoning of the property to CIV would make the zoning and land use designation consistent with each other and implement the General Plan; WHEREAS, 
the rezoning of this property includes a code text amendment (MCTA 13-04) to amend Chapter 17.18 of Title 17 of the Municipal Code, to add park, public sports and 
wireless communication facilities as permitted uses in the CIV zone, so as to make the existing park space, ball fields and wireless communication facilities as permissible 

uses, pursuant to the Ordinance attached as Exhibit A. 

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning and the Municipal Code Text Amendment at the meeting of November 21, 2013; 

WHEREAS, it was determined that the rezoning and the code text amendment qualify for a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption pursuant to 
Section 15061(b)(3) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA, as the there is no possibility that the rezoning and the code text amendment will have a significant impact on the 

environment; 

WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the public hearing on the matter, which public hearing was held before the City Council on January 14, 2014, with all testimony 
being received being made part of the public record; 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre as follows: 

SECTION 1: The City zoning map is hereby revised to change the zoning for the property located at 611 E. Sierra Madre Boulevard (Assessor Parcel Number 5766-005903), 
from R-1-15 (One-Family Residential) to CIV (Civic) zone, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 

SECTION 2: Chapter 17.18 of Title 17 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding the following to Section 17.18.010 Permitted Uses: “G. Parks; H. 
Public sports facilities; I. Wireless communication facilities for which a permit has been issued consistent with Chapter 17.93.” 

SECTION 3: Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise 
invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance 
and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or 
phrases be declared unconstitutional. 

SECTION 4: CEQA: it was determined that the Municipal Code Text Amendment and revision to the zoning map qualify for a California Environmental Quality Act 
(CEQA) Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Review for Exemption) of CEQA, as the there is no possibility that the proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment 

and revision to the zoning map would have a significant impact on the environment. 

SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner prescribed by law. 

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 2014. 

AYES: COUNCILPERSON: 
NOES: COUNCILPERSON: 

Exhibit A 


NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF CONNEITTA FRANCES 
Case No. BP148650 

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of CONNEITTA FRANCES 


A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Culley Vance Eaby in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Culley Vance Eaby be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file 
kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal rep


resentative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to 

give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless 

an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on Feb. 25, 2014 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 11 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the 

hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative 
appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) 
of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form 
DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice 
form is available from the court clerk. 

Attorney for petitioner:

DARRELL G BROOKE ESQ, SBN 118071

TAYLOR SUMMERS RHODES RASMUSSEN BROOKE & TOROSSIAN 

301 E COLORADO BLVD STE 407 

PASADENA CA 91101-1911 

Published Mountain Views News 

January 25, 2014 and February 1, 8, and 15, 2014 

City of Sierra Madre 
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 
From: 
Subject:
Applicant:
Project Location: 
The City of Sierra MadreMUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 13-05 (MCTA 13-05) 
City of Sierra MadreProperties in the City of Sierra Madre, County of Los Angeles, State of California 

The City of Sierra Madre gives notice, pursuant to State of California law, that the Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing to consider recommending 

adoption of a text amendment to revise the definition of “bedroom” in the R-1 Zone (One Family Residential), R-2 Zone (Two-Family Residential), R-3 Zone 

(Multiple-Family Residential), Hillside Management Zone (HMZ) and Residential Canyon (R-C). 

DATE AND TIME OF HEARING PLACE OF HEARING 

City of Sierra Madre City of Sierra MadrePlanning Commission meeting City Council ChambersThursday, February 20, 2014 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. 
(Hearing begins at 7:00 p.m.) Sierra Madre, CA 

All interested persons may attend this meeting and the Planning Commission will hear them with respect thereto. 

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project qualifies for an Exemption, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act 
(CEQA) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. 

APPEAL: A decision by the Planning Commission is subject to a 10-day appeal period to the City Council. If in the future anyone wishes to challenge the decision

of the Planning Commission in court, one may be limited to raising the issues that were raised or presented in written correspondence delivered to the Planning

Commission at, or before, the scheduled public hearing. For further information on this subject, please contact the Development Services Department at (626) 355


7138. 

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: 
ROBERT B. BRODNAX 
CASE NO. BP148942 

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons 

who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of 
ROBERT B. BRODNAX: 

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by BARBARA B. 

WALTERS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS 
ANGELES. 

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that BARBARA B.
WALTERS be appointed as personal representative to administer the 
estate of the decedent. 

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the 
Independent Administration of Estates Act . (This authority will allow

the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining 
court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, 

the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested 
persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed 
action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless 

an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good 

cause why the court should not grant the authority. 

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 
03/10/14 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS 
ANGELES, CA 90012 

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at 

the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the 

court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your 
attorney. 

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, 

you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal 

representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four 

months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal 
representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate 

Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you 
of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. 

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as 

a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in 

California law. 

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person 
interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special 
Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of 

estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code 
section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the 

court clerk. 

Attorney for PetitionerCHRISTOPHER J. ZUCCONI 
2496 E ST #2C 
SAN DIEGO CA 92102 
2/15, 2/22, 3/1/14CNS-2586094# 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME 

MIRIAM LOPEZ 
CASE NO. VS025416 

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner MIRIAM LOPEZ 
HAS FILED A PETITION WITH THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR 
COURT - SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR A 
DECREE CHANGING NAMES AS FOLLOWS: 

Present Name: Miriam Lopez 
Proposed Name: Elsie Michelle Lopez 

A HEARING on the petition will be held on 03/12/2014 at 1:30 
PM in Dept. C Rm. 312 located at 12720 Norwalk Blvd., Norwalk, 
Ca. 90650. 

THE COURT ORDERS that all interested in this matter appear 
before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if 
any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. 

 Any person objecting to the name changes described above 
must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection 
at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to 
be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the 
petition should not be granted. 

 If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the 
petition without a hearing. 

Petitioner Appearing Pro PerAdrian J. Lopez10911 Rosecrans Avenue 
Norwalk, Ca. 90650 
JDC - MVNews 
January 25, 2014 and 
February 1, 8, and 15, 2014