10
OPINION
Mountain Views News Saturday, October 16,, 2010
Mountain Views
News
Publisher/ Editor
Susan Henderson
City Editor
Dean Lee
Sales
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
Art Director
Allison Kirkham
Production Assistant
Richard Garcia
Photography
Jacqueline Truong
Lina Johnson
Contributors
Teresa Baxter
Pat Birdsall
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Stuart Tolchin
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Chris Bertrand
Mary Carney
La Quetta Shamblee
Glenn Lambdin
Greg Wellborn
Ralph McKnight
Trish Collins
Pat Ostrye
Editorial Cartoonist
Ann Cleaves
Webmaster
John Aveny
In this election just a few weeks away, we have much
at stake. We are to choose the next Governor and
one of the two U.S. Senators. All of our statewide
elected officials will be chosen along with numerous
State Assembly and U. S. Congressional seats. Those
are important positions. These are the people who
ultimately will decide our future. They are supposed
to represent the best that we have to offer, capable of
leading California, one of the 10 largest economies in
the world (we used to be the 5th). They need to actually
be qualified to do the job.
Qualified? Yes. Each and every candidate running
has the superficial qualifications – they are citizens
of the US, residents of California, well educated and
felony free. However, the most important credential
that they need is to have a demonstrated commitment
to the people of this state. It is in that last qualification
however, that we find that we find too many of the
candidates, who are willing to spend the most money,
seriously lacking.
When making decisions on who to vote for, the first
thing a responsible voter should do is turn off the TV
and Radio. The commercial marketing of candidates is
no way to choose a leader. It is okay to let a commercial
lead you to the purchase of a new brand of cookies,
because if you don’t like them, you can throw them
away. But when the salacious sound bites blindly lead
you to their candidate, when you find out you don’t like
your choice, you can’t take it back. So, voters, do your
homework. Know who and what you are voting for.
Having said that, and with the contributions of a dozen
members of the Mountain Views Editorial Board who
reach across both sides of the aisle, here are this papers
recommendations for the November 2, 2010 Election.
Susan Henderson, Publisher/Editor
Governor: Jerry Brown
Lt. Governor: Gavin Newsom
Sec. State: Debra Bowen
Controller: John Chang
Treasurer: Bill Lockyer
Atty General: Dual Endorsement:
Kamala Harris
Steve Cooley
59th Assembly District Darcel Woods
44th Assembly District Anthony Portantino
U.S. Senate Barbara Boxer
U.S. Rep Dist 26 David Dreier
U.S. Rep Dist 29 Adam Schiff
Proposition 19. Should California legalize the
possession and cultivation of marijuana for personal
use of adults 21 years and older, and allow state and local
governments to regulate and tax related commercial
activities? NO
Proposition 20. Should the state Constitution be
amended to have the Citizens Redistricting Commission
redistrict for the U.S. House of Representatives, to
change existing redistricting criteria, and to reduce the
redistricting timeline? NO
Proposition 21. Should the state levy an additional
annual $18 vehicle license surcharge to provide funds
to operate and maintain California’s state parks and
wildlife protection programs? YES
Proposition 22. Should the California Constitution
be amended to prohibit the state, even during a severe
fiscal hardship, from redirecting certain tax revenues
dedicated to transportation or local governments?
YES
Proposition 23. Should the AB 32 air pollution
control law be suspended until unemployment drops to
5.5 percent or less for a full year? NO
Proposition 24. Should recent tax law changes that
allow some businesses to pay lower state income tax be
repealed? YES
Proposition 25. Should the state Constitution be
amended to allow passage of budget bills by a simple
majority in each house of the state Legislature and
should legislators be required to forfeit their pay if a
budget is not passed on time? NO
Proposition 26. Should the California Constitution
be amended to require two-thirds vote approval for
the imposition of certain state and local fees that now
require majority vote approval? NO
Proposition 27. Should the state Constitution
and state laws be amended to eliminate the Citizens
Redistricting Commission established by the voters in
2008, return all redistricting to the state Legislature,
and change the redistricting criteria? NO
GENERAL ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS
Dates to Remember
October 18, 2010
Last day to register to vote
October 26, 2010
Last day to apply for a vote-by-mail
ballot by mail
November 2, 2010
Election Day
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the
County of Los Angeles
in Court Case number
GS004724: for the City
of Sierra Madre; in Court
Case GS005940 and for
the City of Monrovia in
Court Case No. GS006989
and is published every
Saturday at 55 W. Sierra
Madre Blvd., No. 302,
Sierra Madre, California,
91024. All contents are
copyrighted and may not
be reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the
Mountain Views News and
may be published in part
or whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do not
necessarily express the views
and opinions of the publisher
or staff of the Mountain
Views News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should be
sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327
Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
STUART Tolchin..........On LIFE
HAIL Hamilton
My Turn
The Aggrieved Element In Everyone
My Country Is
Guilty As Charged
Today is
my first day
back from an
East Coast
Vacation
and while
leafing
through
magazines that arrived while
I was absent I came upon
this language describing the
subject of a new movie. “…
as insensitive as he is, (he)
reaches the aggrieved element
in everyone, the human desire
for response.” All at once the
rockets go off, finally I have
reached some understanding
of myself. Do those words,
“the human desire for
response” mean anything to
you? Perhaps not; I will try
and explain.
Returning from
my trip and looking at the
pictures taken mainly be
my wife I realized that, for
me, the most memorable
and enjoyable parts of trip
were the conversations that
I had with strangers. Often
these were momentary
exchanges or sometimes
even prolonged discussions.
My major realization is how
much I enjoyed being alive,
really being alive and being
me, during these moments of
unexpected contact. It is true
that I have a habit of making
comments to strangers. I do
this when I am alone and I do
it when accompanied by wife,
children, or friends. Generally
people—not the strangers—
but my friends and relatives
find this practice annoying. I
have been accused of flirting
or showing off or just wanting
to make a pest of myself but
really I don’t think that’s what’s
going on.
By way of explanation
I will recount an instance
that occurred about three or
four years ago. It was a very
hot day and my wife and
I, accompanied by her two
nephews aged four and five,
took a moderately long hike
to the waterfalls in Eaton
Canyon. There were not many
hikers that day and the hikers
we saw were coming back from
the falls. I, like most Sierra
Madreans, nodded hello or
said something to each of the
hikers as we crossed paths.
I noticed that, at first, the
boys were surprised by this
behavior but very soon they
started greeting people on
their own. As we saw other
hikers approaching the boys
became visibly excited; they
could hardly wait to say hello
and would add other words
like “Great Day for a hike!”
When people responded,
as they invariably did, they
boys were elated—actually
jumping for joy. Eventually,
some hikers approached
and the boys said something
and received no response.
The people were Asian and
perhaps did not speak any
English. In any case, the boys
were very hurt. They were
hurt and angry and deflated.
In the words of the article I
mentioned above they were
aggrieved because their desire
for response had not been
realized. They were no longer
happy about being themselves;
now they had doubts. Had
they done something wrong
or was there something wrong
with those other people. I
think I recall one of the boys
saying he hated those people
and I probably tried in vain to
talk him out of his feelings. I
was younger then.
Enough said about the
incident I guess; but I think it
makes my point more easily
understood. I would not
write any of these articles if
they were not being published
but I know that I am not
writing in an attempt to
please any particular reader.
I know I am writing to meet
some personal need of my
own and yet I am absolutely
thrilled when someone reacts
to my . I am elated when, as
a result of reading my article,
people are motivated to e-mail
me. I am happiest when
people share their feelings
and recollections with me. I
value these responses more
than appraisals of the worth
of my articles or a discussion
of political opinions. I
really believe that a few of
my almost 150 articles have
allowed people to gain a
greater understanding of their
own lives and I treasure that
feeling.
Really, during my
trip to the East Coast, I must
have had at least twenty
significant conversations with
strangers. These strangers
were waiters or waitresses,
people I met while waiting in
line or people sitting next to
me on a train or bus or plane.
There were tears in several
of these conversations which
touched upon frustrations
and dreams and loneliness.
When a stranger listens to
us attentively we are not
distracted by individual
characteristics but instead
feel their individual humanity
and our own. During that
brief conversation we feel
connected and cared about
and alive—at least I do.
Sure, eventually,
our desire for connection
and response will be
thwarted and, yes, we will be
aggrieved. Really, though
it is my experience that this
disappointment usually
happens with friends and
loved ones of whom we
unrealistically maintain
expectations of connection
and understanding. With
strangers we have no
expectations and therefore
cannot be disappointed. I
hope the time you took to
read this article is a time you
felt was well spent but I can
say without reservation that I
have enjoyed my conversation
with you. So far so good.
I don’t believe in blaming
the US for all of Mexico’s
problems. But I do think we
deserve much of the blame
for the narco-terrorism that is
increasingly engulfing much of
Mexico. occuring and growing
in Guatemala and rightly so.
I am a teacher in East LA and
am married to a naturalized
U.S. citizen from Mexico. Until
2006, for 14 years I owned
a beach house in Puerto
Escondido, Oaxaca. I have
always had my misgivings
about the war on drugs.
However, seeing it up close
and personal for the past
decade has only increased my
misgivings into on the drug
issue. It is the devastating
effect of the drug war that
finally made me decide to sell
my house in Oaxaca.
How are the cartels and the
mafias and the narco-traffickers
able to maintain their reign of
terror. It’s the money. Billions
of dollars of easy money every
year. The vast majority of this
money comes from the drug
consumers of the US. And
that is what finally hit me.
US citiizens are financing all
of cartels and mafias and the
narco-traffickers and that
makes the US government
responsible for all of killing
and corruption and terror in
Mexico, and elsewhere in Latin
America.
Because the drugs are illegal,
there is risk in bringing the
product to the customer and
that results in the high prices
that the consumer has to pay.
The US war on drugs has
effectively placed a very high
tax on the drugs that, of course
gets passed on to the consumer.
But, the ironic thing is its not
the US government that gets to
collect the tax, its the cartels,
the mafias, and the narco-
traffickers that collect the tax.
They have more money than
the national governments.
They are better armed than
most police. They hold entire
cities hostage. They fight each
other for control of territory ,
killing not only each other but
anyone else that happens to be
in the way.
Crime in the streets, Tijuana,
Juarez, Nuevo Laredo, it doesn’t
matter where, is like fighting
a gorilla war. You can never
win a gorilla war. It just keeps
going on and on. For normal
crime we have police and they
do what they can to protect
us. But the drug business is no
normal criminal activity. There
just so much money involved.
It makes the narco-traffickers
absolutly ruthless. With so
much money, they can easily
corrupt officiaals and those
they can’t corrupt they kill.
Unlike all other gorilla wars,
this gorilla war can be won,
sort of speaking. If drugs
were legalized, there would
no longer be the profit motive
that there is now. This idea is
usually rejected for fear that
drug use woud increase. I’m
not convinced. From what I’ve
read, Holland and Portugal,
which have very liberal drug
laws, have seen an increase in
drug use. There will always be
a segment of society that are
going to use drugs and they
are going to use them whether
the drugs are legal or not.
Legalizing drugs would free up
billions of dollars that could
be better spent on programs
to help people free themselves
from their addictions.
I don’t know if the US will
ever change their stance on
the drug issue. I certainly
hope so. I feel bad that my
country is responsible for so
much suffering in the world.
Good luck to you and to all the
people of Mexico.
Mountain Views
News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
the community
newspaper and
the concerns of
our readers are
this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence
of our natural
resources. Integrity
will be our guide.
|