14
OPINION
Mountain Views News Saturday, April 2, 2016
Mountain
Views
News
PUBLISHER/ EDITOR
Susan Henderson
CITY EDITOR
Dean Lee
EAST VALLEY EDITOR
Joan Schmidt
BUSINESS EDITOR
LaQuetta Shamblee
PRODUCTION
Richard Garcia
SALES
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
WEBMASTER
John Aveny
CONTRIBUTORS
Chris Leclerc
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Dr. Tina Paul
Rich Johnson
Merri Jill Finstrom
Lori Koop
Rev. James Snyder
Tina Paul
Mary Carney
Katie Hopkins
Deanne Davis
Despina Arouzman
Greg Welborn
Renee Quenell
Ben Show
Sean Kayden
Marc Garlett
Pat Birdsall (retired)
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
UUT, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POVERTY
AND MODEST MUNICIPAL RESPECTABILITY
Dear Editor:
re: UUT, the difference between poverty and modest municipal respectability.
We have lived here over 25 years. I can remember when we were so poor that
when we needed to replace a police car we were reduced to considering a used
car from another jurisdiction. I can remember when we couldn’t afford to pay
the bill of the mechanic who repaired the fire trucks. It is only about 3 years ago
that our street got paved, work that should have been at least a decade earlier.
I remember when we first got paramedics, I believe the last city in the county
to do so. You know that normally over 3/4 of calls to the fire department are
medically related. Previously we were served by volunteer EMTs. I remember
that at the time a long time volunteer fire fighter/EMT was asked if he felt badly
about the new paid paramedics; he replied that if he were to have a heart attack
he would far rather have a trained paramedic come than an EMT like himself.
Voting “no” on the UUT is like trying to “save” money by firing the gardener
and letting the front yard go. You will lose far more in the loss in value of your
property. Similarly if we “save” money by cutting out the services that make us
safe and the type of community that other people admire we will pay the price
many times over in the loss of property values.
Eric Olson
Sierra Madre
From An Informed Citizen:
There was an egregious math error made by Michele Davenport in her editorial
a couple of weeks ago.
She stated that the unfunded pension liability was $9.7 Million or $6,754 per
household.
According to cited documentation, the unfunded actuarial liability is
$9,665,477. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are 5,113 households
in Sierra Madre. The per household calculation is simple, divide the liability by
the number of housing units.
The answer is $1,890.37 not her $6,754. Her number is 257% too high!!!
Thank you for considering Ms. Davenports egregious error and setting it
right.
MVNews
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the County
of Los Angeles in Court
Case number GS004724:
for the City of Sierra
Madre; in Court Case
GS005940 and for the
City of Monrovia in Court
Case No. GS006989 and
is published every Saturday
at 80 W. Sierra Madre
Blvd., No. 327, Sierra
Madre, California, 91024.
All contents are copyrighted
and may not be
reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the Mountain
Views News and may
be published in part or
whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do
not necessarily express
the views and opinions
of the publisher or staff
of the Mountain Views
News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should
be sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl.
#327
Sierra Madre, Ca.
91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
LEFT TURN/RIGHT TURN
HOWARD Hays As I See It
MAKING SENSE Michael Reagan
DON’T DUMP ON THE
PRIMARY PROCESS
“It’s the old African
saying . . . If you want
to go fast, go alone.
But if you want to go
far, go together.”
- Sen. Cory Booker
(D-NJ) on HBO’s
“Real Time with Bill
Maher”
This came from Bill
Maher’s interview with Sen. Booker at the
opening of his show last week. I always tune
in – I enjoy the left-right diversity of the
guests and find myself agreeing with Maher
on most everything. But in this interview he
sounded more like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX);
frustrated that Sen. Booker refused to attach
the modifier “Islamic” to the “terrorism”
they were discussing. There’s a big difference
between mere ambivalence and outright
hostility towards religion. Maher saw the
discussion as an opportunity to knock
Islam, while Booker insisted that in fighting
terrorists, if we want to “go far” we need to
“go together”.
A PBS “Frontline” documentary on Saudi
Arabia showed youngsters studying their
Sunni Wahhabi textbooks which call for
death to Christians and Jews – but also to
Shia Muslims, who themselves have suffered
most from terrorism in the name of Islam.
It showed official “vice” patrols physically
attacking women wearing make-up and men
playing music. Victims punished for such
heresies no doubt have their own personal
commitment to their Muslim faith. But as
the documentary made clear, the underlying
purpose of such brutal state-sanctioned
zealotry was not to protect any religion but
rather to protect the power of the ruling elite.
On the internet there are pictures from
the makeshift camps in Greece of Syrian
refugees expressing solidarity with victims
of the Brussels terrorist bombings. We hear
local law enforcement, national security
and international intelligence officials warn
how anti-Muslim rhetoric feeds the terrorist
propaganda - aiding their recruitment and
alienating the very people whose cooperation
is needed most in helping combat the threat.
Now we have Bill Maher and Sen. Cruz
feeding the ISIS propaganda machine;
with Maher condemning an entire religion
and Cruz calling on authorities to “patrol
and secure” Muslim communities in our
own country – along with barring refugees
from places like Iraq and Syria. (None of
the identified attackers in both Paris and
Brussels had been refugees; all were European
nationals born and raised there.)
Going alone with those sharing a particular
“faith” might help one go fast in mobilizing
a base but, as Republicans are finding out,
it won’t get you far in getting things done.
The GOP used to rely on big business going
together with “social conservatives”. But in
its post-mortem following the 2012 election,
it realized it had to de-emphasize the latter
in order to expand the party’s base. Now,
however, as both here and in the Middle
East “religion” is being used to divide people,
that plan’s gone out the window – while big
business (and big sports) try to salvage what
they can of their party.
Two years ago, Arizona’s Gov. Jan Brewer
(R) vetoed a “religious liberty” bill which
sought to give legal cover for discrimination
against gay folks, under pressure from her
business community – and also to assure her
state could host the then-upcoming Super
Bowl. Last year, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R)
had to re-jigger a similar ordinance after the
NCAA made clear there wouldn’t be a Final
Four in Indianapolis under a cloud of state-
sponsored bigotry.
In North Carolina, Gov. Pat McCrory
(R) and his Republican legislature remain
determined to go alone; separated not only
from those who don’t share their bigotry
but from their own local governments.
The state now prohibits localities, perhaps
acting on their own religious convictions,
from banning discrimination against gays.
Rev. Franklin Graham calls it a matter
of “the protection of our citizens” and
“morality”. The state’s Attorney General
Roy Cooper (a Democrat set to challenge
McCrory for the governorship) calls it
a “national embarrassment”. The NBA
calls it a reason to maybe pull next year’s
All-Star game from Charlotte (which
had passed its own now-nullified non-
discrimination law).
Georgia’s Gov. Nathan Deal (R) recently
vetoed his state’s “religious freedom to
discriminate” law. But that doesn’t mean
religious zealots in his state aren’t going
fast in getting stuff done by going alone. In
Cobb County (largest city Marietta), they’ve
succeeded in halting their schools’ efforts to
combat stress and encourage “mindfulness”
by offering yoga in the classroom, This
included students’ holding palms together in
front of their hearts and saying “Namaste”.
That word refers to “peace, honor, and
respect for human being”, as does the “heart-
centered” placement of hands.
But no matter – to the Evangelicals it
represents some heathen Eastern religion which
cannot be tolerated. In their crusade to ban yoga
they are not going alone, but in fact are going
far throughout the world by going together with
another group intent on banning such Hindu-
based practices. The “Christians” of Georgia are
going together with those who seek to ban yoga
in Malaysia, Indonesia and other areas under
their influence as incompatible with Sharia law.
In this those Evangelical Georgians aren’t going
alone, but are going together with ISIS, the
Islamic State.
I might amend that African saying
quoted by Sen. Cory Booker; that while you
might go far by going together, it might also
be a good idea to consider who it is you’re
travelling with.
The Republican Party establishment
wants to dump Trump.
Jeb, Marco and Carly wanted to dump
Trump. Ted and John still hope to dump
Trump. So does Mitt.
Everyone in the GOP is on the same
anti-Trump page. They all want to dump
him – and they’ll use every trick play in
the primary book to do it.
So why is everyone in the party so
angry about the way the primary process
is going? This is the process.
It’s really pretty simple.
If you want to be the Republican
Party’s presidential candidate for 2016,
you have to reach 1,237 delegates to win
the nomination.
It’s not who gets close to 1,237
delegates. It’s who gets that number or
more. That’s the way the system works.
In the Super Bowl, we don’t say to a
team that if you get to the five-yard line
you get six points. Or if your field goal
goes just a little bit wide, you get three
points.
You have to cross the goal line and get
into the end zone. You’ve got to split the
uprights. Those are the rules.
Whether you’re Donald Trump, Ted
Cruz, John Kasich or a candidate-to-be-
named-later at a contested convention, if
you want to win the game you have to get
the necessary number of delegates.
What’s going on now in the GOP
primary is perfectly normal. Cruz and
Kasich are both trying to do whatever
they can to stop Trump.
The people calling for Kasich to drop
out so Cruz can go head-to-head against
Trump are wrong. What makes them
believe all of Kasich’s voters will move
over to Cruz?
What Kasich said the other day is
absolutely true. If he had dropped out
before Ohio, Trump would have won
that state’s 66 delegates and be even
closer to reaching 1,237.
So what if Kasich can’t possibly win
on the first ballot? It’s good that he is still
running.
He’s the last sitting governor left in the
race. We also have a first-term senator
and a billionaire celebrity businessman
who’s never been elected to anything.
What’s wrong with that trio? If there’s
a contested convention, Republicans get
to choose one of them or maybe someone
else.
Trust me, the struggle to deny Trump
the nomination on the first ballot is not
anything to be upset about. It’s part of
the process.
In 1976 what do you think we Reagans
were trying to do
at the Republican
convention?
We were
trying to prevent
President Ford from winning the
nomination on the first ballot by busting
up the New York delegation.
We were also trying to bust up the
Pennsylvania delegation. That’s why
my father named liberal Sen. Richard
Schweicker of Pennsylvania his VP
choice before the convention started.
Our plans didn’t work. We lost. I was
there, so I know how that felt. But by
losing we Reagan Republicans actually
won in the long run.
If my father had become president in
1976, he would not have been able to do
what he did in the 1980s to defeat the
Soviet Union without firing a shot.
Winning the presidential primary is
always a rough and tough process. Some
Republicans want you to win and some
don’t want you to win.
The most important thing is, at the
end of the day you’re supposed to gather
around the party’s choice -- whoever it is
-- and move forward.
Democrats do that well. Republicans
don’t. They keep looking for reasons not
to support their nominee.
If evangelicals and conservatives had
supported and voted for Mitt Romney in
2012, instead of staying home out of spite
because their favorite guy didn’t win
the nomination, the Republican Party
wouldn’t have a Trump problem today.
The GOP establishment, the Tea
Party crowd, the evangelicals and the
libertarians will need to unite and work
hard this fall if they hope to prevent
another President Clinton.
Even if they fail to dump Trump.
——-
Copyright ©2016 Michael Reagan.
Michael Reagan is the son of President
Ronald Reagan, a political consultant,
and the author of “The New Reagan
Revolution” (St. Martin’s Press). He is
the founder of the email service reagan.
com and president of The Reagan Legacy
Foundation. Visit his websites at www.
reagan.com and www.michaelereagan.
com. Send comments to Reagan@
caglecartoons.com. Follow @reaganworld
on Twitter.
Mike’s column is distributed exclusively
by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.
For info on using columns contact Sales at
sales@cagle.com.
Mountain Views News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
community news-
papers and the
concerns of our readers
are this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence of
our natural resources.
Integrity will be our
guide.
Mountain Views News 80 W Sierra Madre Blvd. No. 327 Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024 Office: 626.355.2737 Fax: 626.609.3285 Email: editor@mtnviewsnews.com Website: www.mtnviewsnews.com
|