12
OPINION
MountainViews-News Saturday, September 11, 2010
9/11 and the Myth of the “Outside Enemy”
HAIL Hamilton
My Turn
Mountain Views
News
Publisher/ Editor
Susan Henderson
City Editor
Dean Lee
Sales
Patricia Colonello
626-355-2737
626-818-2698
Art Director
Allison Kirkham
Production Assistant
Richard Garcia
Photography
Jacqueline Truong
Lina Johnson
Contributors
Teresa Baxter
Pat Birdsall
Bob Eklund
Howard Hays
Paul Carpenter
Stuart Tolchin
Kim Clymer-Kelley
Christopher Nyerges
Peter Dills
Hail Hamilton
Rich Johnson
Chris Bertrand
Mary Carney
La Quetta Shamblee
Glenn Lambdin
Greg Wellborn
Ralph McKnight
Trish Collins
Pat Ostrye
Editorial Cartoonist
Ann Cleaves
Webmaster
John Aveny
At eleven o’clock,
on the morning of
September 11, the Bush
administration had
already announced that
Al Qaeda was responsible
for the attacks on the
World Trade Center
and the Pentagon. This
assertion was made prior to the conduct of any in-
depth police investigation.
That same evening at 9.30 pm, a “War Cabinet”
was formed integrated by a select number of top
intelligence and military advisors. And at 11.00
pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White
House, the “War on Terrorism” was officially
launched.
The decision was announced to wage war against
the Taliban and Al Qaeda in retribution for the
9/11 attacks. The following morning on September
12th, the news headlines indelibly pointed to “state
sponsorship” of the 9/11 attacks. In chorus, the
US media was calling for a military intervention
against Afghanistan.
Barely four weeks later, on the 7th of October,
Afghanistan was bombed and invaded by US
troops. Americans were led to believe that the
decision to go to war had been taken on the spur
of the moment, on the evening of September 11, in
response to the attacks and their tragic
consequences.
Little did the public realize that the decision to
launch a war and send troops to Afghanistan had
been taken well in advance of 9/11. The “terrorist,
massive, casualty-producing event” as it was later
described by CentCom Commander General
Tommy Franks, served to galvanize public opinion
in support of a war agenda which was already in its
final planning stage.
The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required
justification to wage a war on “humanitarian
grounds”, with the full support of World public
opinion and the endorsement of the “international
community”.
Several prominent “progressive” intellectuals made
a case for “retaliation against terrorism”, on moral
and ethical grounds. The “just cause” military
doctrine was accepted and upheld at face value as a
legitimate response to 9/11, without examining the
fact that Washington had not only supported the
“Islamic terror network”, it was also instrumental
in the installation of the Taliban government in
1996.
In the wake of 9/11, any opposition to the war
was completely isolated. The trade unions and
civil society organizations had swallowed the
media lies and government propaganda. They had
accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan,
an impoverished country of 30 million people.
The official story described nineteen Al Qaeda
sponsored hijackers involved in a highly
sophisticated and organized operation. This
myth of the “outside enemy” and the threat of
“Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the
Bush administrations’ military doctrine, used
as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq,
not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and
constitutional government in America.
Without an “outside enemy”, there could be no
“war on terrorism”. The entire national security
agenda would collapse “like a deck of cards”. The
war criminals in high office would have no leg to
stand on.
Amply documented but rarely mentioned by the
mainstream media, Al Qaeda was a creation of the
CIA going back to the Soviet-Afghan war. This was
a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources
including official documents of the US Congress.
The intelligence community had time and again
acknowledged that they had indeed supported
Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the
Cold War: “he turned against us”. After 9/11, the
campaign of media disinformation served not
only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the
historical evidence on how this illusive “outside
enemy” had been fabricated and transformed into
“Enemy Number One”.
Hope everyone had a nice Labor Day weekend.
For me it brought back memories of clam-
digging, weenie-roasts, and a history they don’t
teach at schools anymore. At least by high school,
we’d have learned about Samuel Gompers, the
AFL-CIO, John L. Lewis and the United Mine
Workers, the Flint, Michigan auto workers
strike, Harry Bridges and the longshoremen in San Francisco.
If you remember such things being taught in school, you’re
old enough to remember growing up when blue-collar meant
middle-class, when one income was sufficient to raise a family in
a decent home, when more than one-in-five American workers
belonged to a union (around 7% today) and the daily newspaper
contained not just a “Business Section” of Wall Street numbers
but a prominent section of “Labor News”.
The August 1963 “March on Washington” featured Rev. Martin
Luther King, Jr., but was initiated by long-time labor organizer
A. Philip Randolph, AFL-CIO vice-president and head of the
Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. Many of those “sleeping
cars” were manufactured by the Pullman Company, which itself
has a relevant history.
By the 1890s, George Pullman had created a “company town”
for employees of the Pullman Palace Car Company in what is now
part of Chicago. The homes workers lived in and the stores they
shopped at were all owned by the company. During the “Panic of
1893”, wages were dropped but living expenses and store prices
stayed the same - and Pullman refused to meet with workers to
discuss the low wages and 12-hour work days. Employees went
on strike, and soon railroad workers throughout the country were
refusing to handle trains pulling Pullman cars.
In response, Pullman arranged to have Pullman cars attached
to trains carrying the U.S. Mail - forcing the federal government
to act. President Grover Cleveland dispatched 12,000 U.S. Army
troops, and after several days the strike ended with 13 strikers
killed and 57 wounded. Partially in atonement, partially in
recognition of the political need to maintain good relations with
the growing labor movement, six days after the strike ended
President Cleveland pushed through a measure to recognize as
a national holiday an annual observance of the Central Labor
Union of New York (the first major integrated union) called
“Labor Day”.
The holiday is also seen as the unofficial kick-off of the final
stretch in the campaign season, so I managed to break away
to attend the opening of the Democratic Volunteer Center in
Claremont and engage in one of my favorite pastimes - talking
politics.
I chatted with our mayor, Joe Mosca. He’s into the nuts-and-
bolts of the process, and spoke of dealing with those convoluted
legislative district boundaries. As he explained, the boundaries
were drawn initially with the intent of ensuring those who had
power would keep it. Representatives of the relatively well-to-
do communities of the foothills didn’t want to be threatened by
voters from the lower-income, working-class communities to
the south, while office-holders from those communities didn’t
want to worry about the upper-income electorate to the north.
Increasingly, distinctions became blurred as shared concerns
regarding families, communities and country became more
apparent - and those boundaries became more an impediment to
effective representation.
I spoke with Karen Suarez of Foothill Community Democrats,
who found she’s in agreement with Carly Fiorina. She recalled
that in Fiorina’s recent debate with incumbent Sen. Barbara
Boxer, the challenger made the observation that if we did away
with environmental and worker protections, if an American
worker were entitled to expect no better quality of life than that of
a typical factory worker in China, India or Mexico, we probably
wouldn’t be off-shoring so many jobs. I could agree with that,
too.
I had the opportunity to speak again with Russ Warner, seeking
to unseat thirty-year incumbent David Dreier in our 26th District.
Russ describes himself as a “common man with common-sense
ideas”. He’s gone through experiences shared by many of us;
himself having been a victim of “corporate downsizing”, starting
his own successful small business, raising a family and seeing a
son off to serve our country in Iraq - as opposed to our current
congressman having spent his entire professional life making
millions serving the interests of corporate lobbyists inside the
D.C. beltway.
Speaking with Russ, it’s clear it’s not just a matter of personal
wealth, but of one’s sense of community with others. Wealthy
media stars come to the aid of victims of AIDS in Africa and
earthquakes in Haiti, and Warren Buffet decries the absurdity
of his paying a lower tax rate than his secretary. Then there are
politicians like Dreier, who (just in the past few weeks) would
sacrifice the jobs of teachers and the health of firefighters to
protect the ability of billionaires to shelter income in the Cayman
Islands and maximize the profits of sending jobs overseas.
From 1980 through 2005, 80% of the nation’s growth in incomes
went to the wealthiest 1% of the population. When Congress
approved the $700 billion TARP bailout at the end of President
Bush’s term in 2008, we were told the funds would be used to
open credit again for consumers and small businesses. Instead,
credit’s remained closed and Wall Street execs raked in larger
bonuses than they received in 2007, before the crisis.
Our country was founded by those who sought escape from
the European model of wealth controlled by a small aristocracy.
Ironically, those European countries now enjoy a more equitable
distribution than here, while we see an increasing concentration
of wealth into the hands of an elite few, with the rest of us asked to
rely upon their largesse.
Countless men and women gave their lives, falling victim to
the gas, guns and clubs of hired thugs, local police and federal
troops, fighting for the right to organize into unions and striving
for the ideal of middle-class security for their families and future
generations. They worked to make sure we could enjoy a leisurely
last weekend of summer. Let’s work to honor their memory.
HOWARD Hays
As I See It
Dreier Statement on September 11th Anniversary
"Nine years later, the memories of September 11, 2001 remain as vivid as ever. We remember
and honor the victims, their families, and those who worked so selflessly to ensure the toll
was not greater than it ended up being. Our country entered a new era of vigilance that day,
and the men and women of our military remain on the frontlines of that effort. Although
tremendous progress has been made across the globe, the fight against terrorism continues.
Today, we pay tribute to those who perished on September 11, 2001 and those who have
maintained our security, here at home and abroad, ever since."
—Congressman David Dreier
Mountain Views News
has been adjudicated as
a newspaper of General
Circulation for the
County of Los Angeles
in Court Case number
GS004724: for the City
of Sierra Madre; in Court
Case GS005940 and for
the City of Monrovia in
Court Case No. GS006989
and is published every
Saturday at 55 W. Sierra
Madre Blvd., No. 302,
Sierra Madre, California,
91024. All contents are
copyrighted and may not
be reproduced without the
express written consent of
the publisher. All rights
reserved. All submissions
to this newspaper become
the property of the
Mountain Views News and
may be published in part
or whole.
Opinions and views
expressed by the writers
printed in this paper do not
necessarily express the views
and opinions of the publisher
or staff of the Mountain
Views News.
Mountain Views News is
wholly owned by Grace
Lorraine Publications,
Inc. and reserves the right
to refuse publication of
advertisements and other
materials submitted for
publication.
Letters to the editor and
correspondence should be
sent to:
Mountain Views News
80 W. Sierra Madre Bl. #327
Sierra Madre, Ca. 91024
Phone: 626-355-2737
Fax: 626-609-3285
email:
mtnviewsnews@aol.com
STUART Tolchin ..........On LIFE
A Weekday Visit To The Doctor
This morning I took my
mother to see the doctor.
She’s ninety-five years old
and lives at this old-age
home, an hour and a half-
away, that provides a kind
of minimal supervision.
One of the administrators had called me
and said that my mom had recently seemed
more bewildered than usual and seemed
very confused as to where she was and why
she was there. I asked that an appointment
with a doctor be made and I arrived this
morning, a Tuesday to take her to the
doctor. . Off we went, all the way hearing my
mother tell me that she had no reason to see
the doctor and even if she did who was I to
make an appointment for her
And why hadn’t I told her about it? I
tried explaining to her that I had to make
the appointment because she wouldn’t go to
the doctor voluntarily and if I told her over
the phone that an appointment had been
made for her she would just get mad and say
she wouldn’t go and would worry why an
appointment was being made. She agreed
that she would never voluntarily go to a
doctor unless something was really wrong
and condescendingly explained to me that
the doctors really have nothing to do and
that they just want to see you so they can
charge money and act like big-shots.
Finally we get to the doctor’s office and
find the right suite and are greeted by this
lovely fresh-faced young girl who treats her
like an old friend. I am very pleased by the
cheeriness of the place and say something
like, “Isn’t this nice?” What a mistake! My
mom let’s me have it. “Do you think I’m an
imbecile. Why does she pretend she knows
me?. I’ve never seen her before in my life.
Why are all these flowers here? What are
they trying to hide? Everybody lies to me all
the time. No wonder I’m lonely all the time
and can’t talk to anybody. Take me home I
don’t want to be here.”
Eventually we are taken in to see the
doctor who seems to be very good at his job.
He takes my mom’s blood pressure and I
notice that her pressure is a great deal better
than my own. My mother asks him why I
brought her there and he explains that the
place where she lives is concerned about her
and thinks she might be a little confused. He
asks her what day is today. My mother says
it has to be a weekend or a holiday because
her son (me) works and needs to make
money and would not take a whole day off
to see her unless there was something really
wrong with her, and then she starts to get
sad and says, “Is something really wrong
with me?” She admits to feeling lonely and
confused and not understanding who pays
her bills and worrying that she is going to
be thrown in the street. I explain, as I have
a thousand times, that she gets money form
the government which goes to the place
where she lives and that I pay the rest of her
bills.
This makes her even madder. She says,
“Aha, that explains why I never have a penny
in my purse.” She then expectedly laughs
and says, “Of course I never have to pay for
anything but that makes me crazy.” I give
my mother twenty dollars which she puts
into her purse and worries that someone will
take her money. The doctor interjects that
mother hasn’t had a flu shot. She says why
do I need a flu shot; I don’t have the flu. The
doctor says she should have the shot anyway.
My mother nods at me in that way that let’s
me know that this is proof that the doctor
has nothing to do and wants to give her a
shot just to make money. I look sad and my
mom says, “All right, if it you will make me
happy I’ll let them give me a shot.”
After the shot the doctor and I talk to
my mother about using a walker which she
refuses. “What am I, an invalid?” I take
her back to the Residence Home and walk
her back to her room. She cries and doesn’t
want me to leave and tells me how happy she
is to see me. We hug and I leave and wipe
away a few tears. I realize how fortunate I
am to have a mother who at ninety-five does
not wear glasses or use a hearing aid and still
makes me feel privileged to be connected
to such a vital and real person. Much as
we all find our lives being dominated by
electronic technology that changes most of
social connections to a cyber-world, there is
still nothing that can replace our very real
connections with our loved- ones. How
lucky we all are!
Mountain Views
News
Mission Statement
The traditions of
the community
newspaper and
the concerns of
our readers are
this newspaper’s
top priorities. We
support a prosperous
community of well-
informed citizens.
We hold in high
regard the values
of the exceptional
quality of life in our
community, including
the magnificence
of our natural
resources. Integrity
will be our guide.
|